Comments by "George Albany" (@Spartan322) on "EXPLORE WITH US" channel.

  1. 7
  2. Your experience is anecdotal and local, people need to stop assuming their experience defines reality, especially for everyone else, or that their witness of social media accounts (which can also be faked without references or sources) are reality most especially when they adhere to confirmation bias. Does this happen? Obviously, its impossible to stop and to expect the opposite is exceedingly foolish, its a fallacy to say the least. The question is where and why does it happen? Well its mostly in cities and only specific local places at best, crappy and corrupt places mostly, it is not continuous everywhere and to say otherwise is exceedingly foolish. I'm anti-government and don't believe in any necessity for modern absolutist police as they are a tyrannical overreach of government power but even despite that we can't argue this stuff by claiming falsehoods and fallacies that our experiences define reality. No your experience defines a slim, very slim, aspect of reality that you otherwise inexperienced in knowing of because you will always live secluded from the full front of reality like everyone is. We only experience what we experience in the time we do, we do not know the experiences of others (not truly, we can only know what they claim outside our experience which they do not need to be or may even be incapable of being totally honest about) and we most certainly don't have first hand account of the objective reality of the nature beyond our experiences. Experience is not a metric to what is reality, it is a metric to a slight part of it, to deny this otherwise is not in the least bit foolish as an act and illogical.
    3
  3. 3
  4. Bad parents and crap mental illness services, that's the biggest contributor to this, worse still I have direct experience with the mental illness failures as my mom is schizophrenic bipolar, grateful that her delusions and hallucinations only get her to say hurtful things and nothing more but damn does it hurt to see family lose their minds, in my case I only can really well recall when it was already most the way gone despite that being well beyond the age of 11 when that was the case, (everything before that is scattered and only pertains to specific periods of time) don't know what that says about me but definitely been through a lot of dealing with mental illness, both with my mom and myself, even after getting out of her custody (which was insanely hard to do because court took way too much to convince she was unfit) I was still fairly out of control for a time, but instead of trying to address it with better parenting and counseling alone, they wanted to unnecessarily drug me and leave it at that despite showing no signs that a drug would've worked. (I was aggressive, opposed to authority, short-fused, and occasionally violent and especially immature, I stated of myself occasionally to be depressed, homicidal, and rarely suicidal but showed no signs of acting such behavior, a drug at best would've done nothing to help me and at worst would've harmed me or even instigated me to actually consider performing such things) Thank God my dad said no, been living a normal life without a mental illness diagnosis ever since, I know what schizophrenic bipolar is like first hand and I don't suffer from anything like it despite my mom, and all of my family as well validate that I'm healthy on that front. System always gotta drug ya even if you could recover without drugs easily and never puts time into solving it even if you need the drugs, pisses me off, especially when my mom is constantly homeless because who can stand being yelled at for things that didn't happen that you didn't do in conspiracy with people that don't exist constantly? She's unwell but because she has no violent charges she can't be detained against her will, nobody can help her and if you get her to take drugs she'll stop it in two weeks without acknowledging she ever does anything wrong.
    2
  5. 2
  6. 1
  7. 1
  8.  @carculturenation2166  Truth be told, this is the reason age of consent laws make no sense, I don't see how the age different in mid to upper teens makes a difference in anything especially when its a very natural for younger women to go with older men even at younger ages. It makes no sense as well to me because I don't see sex between say a 15 year old and an 18 year old as any different morally compared to sex outside of wedlock of any other age range. Sex outside of wedlock in all circumstances is evil, wrong, and destructive, its not consistent and can't be logically enforced by any sense by the law and can't represent justice. And to clarify so someone doesn't take the inevitable direction of guilt by association, it is not that I agree with the pedophile mindset that I hate age of consent, I hate it because there is no logical, biological, nor otherwise consistent manner for which such concepts can exist nor be enforced by, you end up describing rules with so much nuance eventually that there exists no more distinct rule for any circumstance and have to make it up practically on the fly. Age is not a consistent metric for any individual, two individuals living to the age of 15 can share completely different levels of psychology and biology like maturity in both, it is easier if we rely on more solid forms of protecting the innocent, problem is if a 15 year old perform such acts they're no more innocent and I don't see how they're a victim, unless we argue that such ages can't victimize others which is logical nonsense given we will convict them for crimes otherwise. The fact of the matter they committed an act, had crap parents that didn't oversee their acts and behavior who did not protect them and raise them properly, and engage with someone into an act that they both were entirely willing and able to an extent to understand, it doesn't matter if the gravitas of the situation is not fully understood, that argument doesn't stand when up to the age of 25 that same argument holds true for men at least, with some still never grasping it beyond that age. That then can't be argument for that rule. So what argument do you have? It is logical nonsense, fallacious even, that a 15 or 16 year old could have sex with someone only slightly older but because of a birthday or lack thereof the other person must be a piece of crap. Either both of them are pieces of crap for having sex or neither of them because we all are pieces of crap, you don't get to be selective about that.
    1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1