General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

George Albany
Asmongold Clips
comments

Comments by "George Albany" (@Spartan322) on "Asmongold Clips" channel.

@nonamedpleb He tweeted for them to not be violent and to not go in and was silenced by twitter before he could, who was also collaborating with the FBI and CIA at the time. Sort of sounds like entrapment to me.
119
Three times, one time in English, one time in French, and again in English because she was speaking French.
64
@AviRox1154 The Mass Effect Trilogy (especially ME2) had some of the best RPG lines, the writers absolutely nailed being a badass in so many cases.
63
ALL HAIL THE MAGIC CONCH!
38
Also Wonder Woman is one of the three biggest members of the Justice League that will take people's lives without remorse as she deems fit and has done so repeatedly
25
@thorpilgrim1866 You give consent by posting the image, if you don't like people using and modifying an image of you, don't post images of yourself, its pretty damn simple.
23
Trump is probably one of the best candidates we could have in 40 years, he's definitely better then Reagan.
18
@ajzaradich6096 "Well Jesus would indeed be considered an activist." "Jesus answered, “My kingdom is not of this world. If my kingdom were of this world, my servants would have been fighting, that I might not be delivered over to the Jews. But my kingdom is not from the world.”" - John 18:36 In a sense perhaps, He did advocate for political supremacy of the Faith over works and the law, but not in the way you're implying.
17
@mysteriouspresent5186 What is moral when you make up your own moral standard? That's what you're doing.
16
Just have them take off their helmet every five minutes to act nothing like military ops but like petulant children who dye their hair because their parents never did and never will love them and they can never get over that fact.
12
Its things like this that make me see Asmon as an idiot, Trump and Vance were reacting exactly as they should have.
11
@Pyle04 No He was not.
11
@kratos.8151 Nice strawman and ignoratio elenchi fallacy. You need to go back to school. (though given your comprehension skills maybe back isn't the operative word)
11
She still gives off serious Kamala Harris energy. Difference is she can actually talk.
9
Unless you're intentionally building a buff and gruff masculine character, there's no reason for fantasy characters to have scars for procedures that wouldn't even happen in a fantasy world. That being aside from the fact isn't trans about trying to be the other sex, why then would you not just choose the other sex?
9
They keep trying to change language to conform to their warped view of reality, they can live as they want, but then they start insisting others tolerate dealing with it, no, I really don't and I'm not gonna apologize for that.
9
Bruh what? This just demonstrates the 19th was a complete mistake, can't even make basic decision holy hell.
8
@weiserwolf580 Do you really think the Baptists who were constantly martyred into the 1800s were following the pack? Or how about the Christian persecutions before Constantine's legalization of Christians? Are we just gonna forget Nero's Roman Candles? Or the Japanese Kirishitan revolts? Or how about the French wars of Religion? Or the Hussite Wars?
5
@daigoro7216 Source?
4
Not to mention if you're trans, why wouldn't you just choose the sex you want? The whole point of them is supposed to be escaping their body, if the logic follows, being reminded of it would make them more inclined to commit suicide, not that they have a good chance of not doing so regardless.
4
@1Fuss Action RPGs are still RPGs.
3
@one_bone_4_life647 And as Paul said "Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. And such were some of you. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God." - 1 Corinthians 6:9-11
3
It'll be hilarious to see it worse then the Shyamalan film.
3
Its not hard to independently confirm this, and yes they do say things this stupid.
3
Casey Hudson was the last guy there before Anthem, all the others were already gone.
3
@nicklasveva Funny part about the suicide thing is that persecuted groups that are the subject of inherent mental illness actually have lower suicide rates under persecution, every minority that was persecuted, while they were under persecution their suicide rates were down.
3
@nicklasveva Its likely because if you're healthy, persecution and hardship builds character and makes you resistant to suffering, which actually makes you better then those lacking persecution, and the demonstration of such not happening is evidence of a problem unrelated to the persecution or hardship. Blacks were (unfortunately) in much better social and economic conditions in the US while they were oppressed and persecuted in the 1900s then when they were free, same to the Christians in the first 3 centuries, (when they weren't rooted by Roman authorities that is) if persecution doesn't make you strong the problem isn't primarily the persecution lets be honest.
3
Oh by the way funny thing, out of the top 3 members of the Justice League being Superman, Batman, and Wonder Woman, Wonder Woman is the only one that willingly and deliberately unalives people as she deems fit under normal circumstances and does so repeatedly in her comics. No joke, Superman and Batman under normal circumstances will never take anyone's life deliberately, Wonder Woman is the only primary founder of the Justice League that not only will do so, but has a repeated record of doing so, and does so without remorse if she deems it fit.
3
This is what we in the business call an embezzling scheme.
3
As a faithful servant of God, its bit weird but its not all that wrong.
3
@emawildchaos9861 That's fallacious argumentation, comparison of incomparables, that's a stupid response.
2
@bznng-he3rm Superman and Batman don't do it at all.
2
Correction: One can not simply call the Gaben.
2
"But I say to you, Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you," - Matthew 5:44
2
@mortarion9813 I take issue with justifying an option on the simple basis of promoting fetishism, mass appeal should not be exposed to someone's sick fetish, that's just disgusting.
2
eh, the former monarchies of Europe and in much of Asia took a millennia or more to collapse, there's not a single democratic institution that currently exists that's older then 300 years old.
2
A lot of women actually love abusers, that's why all their porn, and even much of their non-porn, is about abuse, they get off on being sexually abused, there's a similar thing with the rape crap, they get off on masochistic sex, in comparison men's tastes are pretty tame since most men don't enjoy masochism or sadism. It being a story doesn't change crap, women say the most disgusting things when men aren't around, they often fake their thoughts in front of men, but if you've ever heard a rabble of women when they believe there are no men, its disgusting and horrifying.
2
Its called disparate outcome law, they do it because the Civil Right Act requires it else they'll get sued. All western countries outside of Korea and Japan follow the US on this and its why all countries but Korea and Japan have legally mandated minority quotas. There is no discrimination laws in Korea and Japan, it simply is less profitable in a free market to discriminate, the incentive is against doing so, for economic and social reasons, all US discrimination has always been based on state intervention, Jim Crow was law, you couldn't not do it, they just turned the law in the opposite direction instead of getting rid of it.
2
I'm convinced he was merely a patsy.
1
@UltimaKeyMaster Not really fair since Valve has to actively spend money for no gain and 95% chance it will borke something in CS2 like every update always does.
1
@UdumbaraMusic You got a 0% chance with a bear, no bear will ever care about you and most of them will try to kill you, most men are naturally inclined towards helping women, society was deliberately built by men to in part protect women, most specifically keep them from the nature that would absolutely kill them that they would be less capable to do on their own. Women are more precious then men, it is disadvantageous from a biological perspective to treat men this way, the same as its disadvantageous for men to treat women that way, they don't have subsequent generations. The only reason a woman could even complain about rape culture is because men built a comfortable world where they can complain about such nonsense, without men protecting women, you simply can't live worrying about even that.
1
This what Asmon gets for calling DEI things fake, this is what they do.
1
@user-mv4zi6ey4y See Halo
1
Its because of the Civil Rights Act, look up disparate outcome law, its just legally mandated minority quotas, you get sued otherwise. Japan and Korea are the only western countries that don't have it, hence why they don't have a problem with it, discrimination is not economically profitable, in the US there has never been discrimination without the law enforcing it, Jim Crow was law, not a product of the free market, free markets naturally prefer not to discriminate for better profit, its self-regulating.
1
@IronskullGM They have a western constitution, western style laws, they operate under a western form of government, they have a western economy and are reliant upon trade and cultural interfacing with the west, they also teach English as a secondary language like every European country does, they're part of NATO, they're under numerous western trade deals with both Europe and North America that is not reserved for non-western nations, and they also are extremely open to actual western foreigners. Their culture is reliant upon western principals and ideas, modern Shinto and Buddhist rituals in Japan do not operate like their pre-1800s counter-parts. Also anime itself is based entirely on early 1900s American animation, the US inspired anime. (as says every early anime and manga writer and animation studio) As well they literally were civilized by adopting British, German, French, and American laws and industry going back to the Meji Restoration.
1
@IronskullGM There isn't really a consolidated concept of eastern government because unlike the west which has a shared identity, there is no shared eastern identity as they didn't share a general Christian outlook and they rarely had any diplomatic interest in global powers until they got conquered or colonized usually, they didn't accomplish much of anything except usually seeking independence from western nations, maybe you could consider Cambodia, Laos, and Thailand as "eastern" but that's just Indo-China basically and there isn't much of a shared identity between them, whereas in the west, even a Russian shares a lot with an American as far as values because of the shared socio-cultural Christian outlook, which South Korea and Japan adopted (and in fact to this day has turned Korea into a 35% Christian country, and its only increasing) through westernization efforts by adopting British, German, French, and American outlooks and behaviors, and South Korea itself being an extension off Japan at the time and later being released by the European powers resulted in them having a quite similar society to Japan who is a western nation.
1
@IronskullGM China, Malaysia, Vietnam, Iran, Iraq, Egypt, India, Indonesia, Bhutan are only a few of many examples of nations that aren't western.
1
@IronskullGM I don't know a single case of someone who describes a western nation by its longitude, (and I'm part of numerous groups of map, economic, and history enjoyers, we play Victoria 2 and Crusader Kings 2 for fun) when I refer to "western civilization" not once were we referring to Egypt, Morocco, China, or Iran, westernism, westernization, western civilization, and being western have very little to do with location outside of the origin of the society being in Europe.
1
@IronskullGM Cartographers have very little to do with any historical knowledge beyond mapping history, cultural history is outside your claimed area of knowledge. (which I neither believe because you screwed up even on that knowledge) And you definitely don't know crap about religious history. And no, that's not how any society has described the concept of being western, you're just an idiot. (also nobody calls Islam a western religion, it has nothing to do with being "Abrahamic" not that Islam even spawns from Abraham historically anyway, they're just liars)
1
@emawildchaos9861 Only material things can be owned because they're the only things that can have attested proof of ownership. If it requires government intervention to have, its inherently not a right, its a privilege, a right is built into reality and cannot be taken away without permission or violence, that which is given at leisure can be taken away without permission or violence and thus is a privilege.
1
@emawildchaos9861 Still waiting for somebody to sue me.
1
Well that's inherent to her being a women, she can't be a bishop nor a pastor.
1
They can be teachers, they just can't be spiritual teachers of men, that's what God had said by the Pauline Epistles.
1
@timmytuckerson3450 Nah its only gotten worse.
1
Blame disparate impact law.
1
Its called disparate impact law, its legal to discriminate and actually required by law so long as its in preference to minorities.
1
Populist Republicans would pretty much always win, if only such a world existed.
1
Why the heck wouldn't you just buy two pairs of "barefoot" shoes if you're gonna be this dumb?
1
You know the dumb thing? Identity politics, if it were rationally consistent, would conclude individualism, but they not even smart enough to get there, let alone actually follow through.
1
Its the fault of disparate impact law.
1
Ginger being an anagram is some high level noticing.
1
She's not a pastor because she's a woman, women can't be pastors. (even aside from the fact she's also not Christian) Also Christians aren't supposed to segregated themselves from politics even in the Church, they must act only in accordance to the Bible, she does not and thus is a heretic.
1
Man is asmon out of the loop of police reform and NYC. They've been freely releasing murderers and rapists for years.
1
@xIcarus227 Depends on your behavior, I don't expect you to actually answer my questions when you act like a dumbass entitled child who can't wipe his own ass. I would react the same way, I have no obligation to hear you when you behave like a moron. I don't ask questions to get an answer of your stupid head, I'm asking you to make you realize your in a position to submit or get the hell out of my way. I don't ask questions always intending to get an answer, even if they aren't rhetorical or sarcastic, sometimes I intend to demean you for your disrespect, don't disrespect me and maybe I'll give you some respect, respect is earned, not a given.
1
@xIcarus227 Depends on your behavior, I don't expect you to actually answer my questions when you act like a dumbass entitled child who can't wipe his own ass.
1
@xIcarus227 I would react the same way, I have no obligation to hear you when you behave like a moron.
1
@xIcarus227 I don't ask questions to get an answer of your stupid head, I'm asking you to make you realize your in a position to submit or get the hell out of my way.
1
@xIcarus227 I don't ask questions always intending to get an answer, even if they aren't rhetorical or sarcastic, sometimes I intend to demean you for your disrespect, don't disrespect me and maybe I'll give you some respect, respect is earned, not a given.
1
@xIcarus227 When you make a demand without authority, that's textbook disrespect, go ahead and try that on the street or against a soldier, see how long it takes before they beat your ass for it. One of us has actually gotten hit in the face, so one of us knows what disrespect is, you only really get it if you been beat, sheltered boys like you couldn't take a moth in a fight.
1
@xIcarus227 When you make a demand without authority, that's textbook disrespect, go ahead and try that on the street or against a soldier, see how long it takes before they beat your ass for it.
1
@xIcarus227 One of us has actually gotten hit in the face, so one of us knows what disrespect is, you only really get it if you been beat, sheltered boys like you couldn't take a moth in a fight.
1
@xIcarus227 Why would being punched in the face imply you're a badass, it just means you know how much it hurts to be laid out, you only truly understand what disrespect is when you get a beating.
1
@xIcarus227 Why would being punched in the face imply you're a badass, it just means you know how much it hurts to be laid out.
1
@xIcarus227 You only truly understand what disrespect is when you get a beating.
1
@xIcarus227 "given that you think I somehow disrespected you by asking a question" What? Where the hell did you get that idea from? Do you not know how to read?
1
@xIcarus227 No I didn't, you asked me about asking questions, I answered you on that, what I said had nothing to do with what you said outside of being a direct answer, it doesn't make any sense for what I said to apply to yourself. (unless you're a narcissist or true solipsist)
1
A woman can't be a pastor, she's not a Christian, the Bible is explicitly clear about that, this was an utter sham.
1
@naftulzvi3353 If you think prettier graphics means its decent, its not even worth dealing with you, the narrative, characterization, and intrigue is absolutely worse, E;R said it best, this is gonna be a travesty.
1
@naftulzvi3353 The whole point of Sokka being sexist was him learning to be a better man and stop making false assumptions about women, he had to learn that, lessons are not learned if there is no journey to learn the lesson, you can't make a point that something is bad if there is no struggle for the lesson, else its not going to teach anyone anything and nobody will be capable to sympathize with the character, especially if they suffer from the problem. A situation without contrast isn't a fair assessment of reality. And at least the movie doesn't butcher the entire narrative in a way anyone can take seriously, the film has entertainment value, the show does not.
1
@naftulzvi3353 "Freaking out about rumors of some level of "downplaying" before the show is even out to judge is literally mental illness." Except its not a rumor, its coming from an official source, are you blind? "The film butchering every aspect of the source material even down to the names isn't entertaining." Dude, you watch travesties because they're hilarious to see them go wrong, watching woke propaganda isn't fun because the message is overbearing and obvious and its trying to shove its messaging down your throat. You don't watch B-movies because its well written, you watch it because you don't have to take it seriously. I can laugh at Shyamalan's crap because its hilarious and its not overbearing nor is it shoving a message down your throat, he simply and honestly doesn't understand anything about the show, Netflix is deliberately disregarding everything about the show. "There is media that is bad good and that movie is not one of them." The show is still worse, I'd rather something be written poorly and not understand the medium then for it to be woke and deliberately remove all the intrigue, all characterization, all the narrative, and treat you like a complete and total r*t*rd. I can watch B-movie screwups, there is nothing fun about wokeness. That's entertainment value. If you go into a B-movie thinking its good, you're the one with mental issues and have no idea how to enjoy anything, how could you even watch comedies? "It takes itself seriously and had a budget to match despite failing horrendously." You don't watch The Room because its intended as a comedy, you watch because it takes itself so seriously and yet its so bad its hilarious, you don't watch Tommy Wiseau because he can write, direct, or act but because he can't do any of those things and it makes it a brilliant piece of comedy as a result. Do you watch Sharknado and expect it to be "good"? Or watch Rubber because its the the best film? No, you watch them because they're utter nonsense and its hilarious. Many of Shyamalan's screwed up films are also hilarious, like you don't watch Signs because its a really good film, even though its higher quality then some, the whole premise is comedic gold, that's what a lot of Shyamalan's films are really good for, and they take themselves super seriously without any overbearing messaging crap injected to try and force white propganda down your throat. "The irony that you're bitching so much about this Sokka rumor but are fine with the movie literally doing nothing right is palpable." Again, not a rumor, its an actual source, directly coming from the cast directly which was discussed with the writers, director, and producer. The showrunner confirms the same thing, the co-creators of the original show left because of its complete disregard for the original show. Have you even actually read the article? It has sources, the showrunner openly admits they're not following the show. I'd still rather watch something that does nothing right then something that butchers the source material just to push a woke message and screws up every character, narrative, and element of the setting just to fit "modern audiences", its no different from Jamie Marchi changing the anime to have more gen-z slang, woke politics, and to remove the cultural context that you watch the show for.
1
@naftulzvi3353 "Freaking out about rumors of some level of "downplaying" before the show is even out to judge is literally mental illness." Except its not a rumor, its coming from an official source, are you blind? "The film butchering every aspect of the source material even down to the names isn't entertaining." Dude, you watch travesties because they're hilarious to see them go wrong, watching woke propaganda isn't fun because the message is overbearing and obvious and its trying to shove its messaging down your throat. You don't watch B-movies because its well written, you watch it because you don't have to take it seriously. I can laugh at Shyamalan's crap because its hilarious and its not overbearing nor is it shoving a message down your throat, he simply and honestly doesn't understand anything about the show, Netflix is deliberately disregarding everything about the show. "There is media that is bad good and that movie is not one of them." The show is still worse, I'd rather something be written poorly and not understand the medium then for it to be woke and deliberately remove all the intrigue, all characterization, all the narrative, and treat you like you're completely and totally mental. I can watch B-movie screwups, there is nothing fun about wokeness. That's entertainment value. If you go into a B-movie thinking its good, you're the one with mental issues and have no idea how to enjoy anything, how could you even watch comedies? "It takes itself seriously and had a budget to match despite failing horrendously." You don't watch The Room because its intended as a comedy, you watch because it takes itself so seriously and yet its so bad its hilarious, you don't watch Tommy Wiseau because he can write, direct, or act but because he can't do any of those things and it makes it a brilliant piece of comedy as a result. Do you watch Sharknado and expect it to be "good"? Or watch Rubber because its the the best film? No, you watch them because they're utter nonsense and its hilarious. Many of Shyamalan's screwed up films are also hilarious, like you don't watch Signs because its a really good film, even though its higher quality then some, the whole premise is comedic gold, that's what a lot of Shyamalan's films are really good for, and they take themselves super seriously without any overbearing messaging crap injected to try and force white propganda down your throat. "The irony that you're bitching so much about this Sokka rumor but are fine with the movie literally doing nothing right is palpable." Again, not a rumor, its an actual source, directly coming from the cast directly which was discussed with the writers, director, and producer. The showrunner confirms the same thing, the co-creators of the original show left because of its complete disregard for the original show. Have you even actually read the article? It has sources, the showrunner openly admits they're not following the show. I'd still rather watch something that does nothing right then something that butchers the source material just to push a woke message and screws up every character, narrative, and element of the setting just to fit "modern audiences", its no different from Jamie Marchi changing the anime to have more gen-z slang, woke politics, and to remove the cultural context that you watch the show for.
1
@naftulzvi3353 "Freaking out about rumors of some level of "downplaying" before the show is even out to judge is literally mental illness." Except its not a rumor, its coming from an official source, are you blind? "The film butchering every aspect of the source material even down to the names isn't entertaining." Dude, you watch travesties because they're hilarious to see them go wrong, watching woke propaganda isn't fun because the message is overbearing and obvious and its trying to shove its messaging down your throat. You don't watch B-movies because its well written, you watch it because you don't have to take it seriously. I can laugh at Shyamalan's crap because its hilarious and its not overbearing nor is it shoving a message down your throat, he simply and honestly doesn't understand anything about the show, Netflix is deliberately disregarding everything about the show. "There is media that is bad good and that movie is not one of them." The show is still worse, I'd rather something be written poorly and not understand the medium then for it to be woke and deliberately remove all the intrigue, all characterization, all the narrative, and treat you like you're completely and totally mental. I can watch B-movie screwups, there is nothing fun about going the propaganda route. That's entertainment value. If you go into a B-movie thinking its good, you're the one with mental issues and have no idea how to enjoy anything, how could you even watch comedies? "It takes itself seriously and had a budget to match despite failing horrendously." You don't watch The Room because its intended as a comedy, you watch because it takes itself so seriously and yet its so bad its hilarious, you don't watch Tommy Wiseau because he can write, direct, or act but because he can't do any of those things and it makes it a brilliant piece of comedy as a result. Do you watch Sharknado and expect it to be "good"? Or watch Rubber because its the the best film? No, you watch them because they're utter nonsense and its hilarious. Many of Shyamalan's screwed up films are also hilarious, like you don't watch Signs because its a really good film, even though its higher quality then some, the whole premise is comedic gold, that's what a lot of Shyamalan's films are really good for, and they take themselves super seriously without any overbearing messaging injected to try and force white propaganda down your throat. "The irony that you're bitching so much about this Sokka rumor but are fine with the movie literally doing nothing right is palpable." Again, not a rumor, its an actual source, directly coming from the cast directly which was discussed with the writers, director, and producer. The showrunner confirms the same thing, the co-creators of the original show left because of its complete disregard for the original show. Have you even actually read the article? It has sources, the showrunner openly admits they're not following the show. I'd still rather watch something that does nothing right then something that butchers the source material just to push a wicked message and screws up every character, narrative, and element of the setting just to fit "modern audiences", its no different from Jamie Marchi changing the anime to have more gen-z slang, political propaganda, and to remove the cultural context that you watch the show for.
1
@naftulzvi3353 "Freaking out about rumors of some level of "downplaying" before the show is even out to judge is literally mental illness." Except its not a rumor, its coming from an official source, are you blind? "The film butchering every aspect of the source material even down to the names isn't entertaining." Dude, you watch travesties because they're hilarious to see them go wrong, watching woke propaganda isn't fun because the message is overbearing and obvious and its trying to shove its messaging down your throat. You don't watch B-movies because its well written, you watch it because you don't have to take it seriously. I can laugh at Shyamalan's crap because its hilarious and its not overbearing nor is it shoving a message down your throat, he simply and honestly doesn't understand anything about the show, Netflix is deliberately disregarding everything about the show. "There is media that is bad good and that movie is not one of them." The show is still worse, I'd rather something be written poorly and not understand the medium then for it to be woke and deliberately remove all the intrigue, all characterization, all the narrative, and treat you like you're completely and totally mental. I can watch B-movie screwups, there is nothing fun about going the propaganda route. That's entertainment value. If you go into a B-movie thinking its good, you're the one with mental issues and have no idea how to enjoy anything, how could you even watch comedies? "It takes itself seriously and had a budget to match despite failing horrendously." You don't watch The Room because its intended as a comedy, you watch because it takes itself so seriously and yet its so bad its hilarious, you don't watch Tommy Wiseau because he can write, direct, or act but because he can't do any of those things and it makes it a brilliant piece of comedy as a result. Do you watch Sharknado and expect it to be "good"? Or watch Rubber because its the the best film? No, you watch them because they're utter nonsense and its hilarious. Many of Shyamalan's screwed up films are also hilarious, like you don't watch Signs because its a really good film, even though its higher quality then some, the whole premise is comedic gold, that's what a lot of Shyamalan's films are really good for, and they take themselves super seriously without any overbearing messaging injected to try and force white propaganda down your throat. "The irony that you're bitching so much about this Sokka rumor but are fine with the movie literally doing nothing right is palpable." Again, not a rumor, its an actual source, directly coming from the cast directly which was discussed with the writers, director, and producer. The showrunner confirms the same thing, the co-creators of the original show left because of its complete disregard for the original show. Have you even actually read the article? It has sources, the showrunner openly admits they're not following the show. I'd still rather watch something that does nothing right then something that butchers the source material just to push a wicked message and screws up every character, narrative, and element of the setting just to fit "modern audiences", its no different from Jamie Marchi changing the anime to have more gen-z slang, political propaganda, and to remove the cultural context that you watch the show for.
1
@naftulzvi3353 "Freaking out about rumors of some level of "downplaying" before the show is even out to judge is literally mental illness." Except its not a rumor, its coming from an official source, are you a brainlet? "The film butchering every aspect of the source material even down to the names isn't entertaining." Dude, you watch travesties because they're hilarious to see them go wrong, watching propaganda isn't fun because the message is overbearing and obvious and its trying to shove its messaging down your throat. You don't watch B-movies because its well written, you watch it because you don't have to take it seriously. I can laugh at Shyamalan's crap because its hilarious and its not overbearing nor is it shoving a message down your throat, he simply and honestly doesn't understand anything about the show, Netflix is deliberately disregarding everything about the show. "There is media that is bad good and that movie is not one of them." The show is still worse, I'd rather something be written poorly and not understand the medium then for it to be woke and deliberately remove all the intrigue, all characterization, all the narrative, and treat you like you're completely and totally mental. I can watch B-movie screwups, there is nothing fun about going the propaganda route. That's entertainment value. If you go into a B-movie thinking its good, you're the one with mental issues and have no idea how to enjoy anything, how could you even watch comedies? "It takes itself seriously and had a budget to match despite failing horrendously." You don't watch The Room because its intended as a comedy, you watch because it takes itself so seriously and yet its so bad its hilarious, you don't watch Tommy Wiseau because he can write, direct, or act but because he can't do any of those things and it makes it a brilliant piece of comedy as a result. Do you watch Sharknado and expect it to be "good"? Or watch Rubber because its the the best film? No, you watch them because they're utter nonsense and its hilarious. Many of Shyamalan's screwed up films are also hilarious, like you don't watch Signs because its a really good film, even though its higher quality then some, the whole premise is comedic gold, that's what a lot of Shyamalan's films are really good for, and they take themselves super seriously without any overbearing messaging injected to try and force white propaganda down your throat. "The irony that you're bitching so much about this Sokka rumor but are fine with the movie literally doing nothing right is palpable." Again, not a rumor, its an actual source, directly coming from the cast directly which was discussed with the writers, director, and producer. The showrunner confirms the same thing, the co-creators of the original show left because of its complete disregard for the original show. Have you even actually read the article? It has sources, the showrunner openly admits they're not following the show. I'd still rather watch something that does nothing right then something that butchers the source material just to push a wicked message and screws up every character, narrative, and element of the setting just to fit "modern audiences", its no different from Jamie Marchi changing the anime to have more gen-z slang, political propaganda, and to remove the cultural context that you watch the show for.
1
Blame the Civil Rights Act, we have disparate impact law in the west which mandates discrimination in preference to minorities else you'll be sued to nothing.
1
@adianblabla Just gotta love disparate impact law.
1
@reaperplays47 You can't publish a paper unless you tow the ideological line, and every major academic institution is super woke, Harvard just had to layoff another of their medical professors for false publishing of academic papers with plagiarism. And peer review is not a standard of quality, but they tout it like it is, STEM is full of this bullcrap.
1
She's not even a Christian, she's a heretic, women can't be pastors, she's clearly never read the Bible. (or she rejects everything she disagrees with, which in reality is the entire book)
1
@ajzaradich6096 "Also the bible condones actual slavery" There are two forms of active participation of "slavery" found in the Bible, indentured servitude, as in when you are indebted to someone where you can't pay the debt you become their servant until the the payment is cleared, and war bondage. The other was war bondage is in when you conquer a people you "enslave" the survivors so that they may live and not risk rising up against you, this was a very merciful and common practice in the ancient world so as to prevent the need of wiping people out when they lost a war. If you didn't they would soon try to attack you again killing more people, it preserved human life. The only other case is when they bought slaves from the pagans who had already enslaved someone, however if they found question in how they were enslaved they would've been required to release them by the Law. Now all this said there is the year of Jubilee which about every so many years they are required to free all servants and slaves. Also all slaves and servants must be treated rightly and justly, you cannot beat them that they should be harmed or they shall be immediately set free, and if you kill or grape them you would be immediately executed. You are also required to take care of them should they come to harm.
1
@tzaphkielconficturus7136 Correct
1
@daigoro7216 "Giuliani case" Had nothing to do with Trump, he did that himself. Which I might add its not a crime to lose a lawsuit, even against the state. (nor is it a crime to sue someone even if you were to believe yourself likely to lose the case) "Georgia calls" A case of complete fabrication? Like the details of those claims do not refer to a crime. "Jeffrey Clark as AG to overturn the election." Even though he's not being charged with that and nobody is even pointing to that as evidence of a crime. Go examine the court cases they did make, none of them are related to that.
1
This was in 2012, that movement claims to have succeeded in reforming section 5, but the same issue have remained.
1
Blame the Civil Rights Act, its a product of disparate outcome law, otherwise known as legally mandated minority quotas, they can sue you for not implementing them. Go ahead and look it up. Reason it doesn't happen in Japan or Korea is because they don't have any civil rights laws for private business, whereas most western countries, like Sweden, Poland, Britain, France, and Germany do. You don't need laws to prevent discrimination because the private market solves it through basic incentives, it is simply less profitable to discriminate, all discrimination in the US has always been based on state intervention. (Jim Crow was law, you were not allowed to violate it)
1
She's not a Christian, women can't be bishops or pastors.
1
You know when I think of an 8 out of 10 woman, I'd expect her to live past 35.
1
Kinda feels like this be a lawsuit in the EU.
1
Given she rejects the Bible, as she's a "bishop" (which makes her a heretic), she's probably never even read that.
1
Look up disparate impact law and only then will you understand why it is legally required for companies like SBI to be used by western companies.
1
She's not a pastor, she's just a heretic fool on a lectern.
1
@holy8782 The majority here already are voting for him, also majority doesn't win elections, the US is deliberately not a democracy. "Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide." - John Adams "Democracies have been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property; and in general been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their death." - James Madison "It has been observed that a pure democracy if it were practicable would be the most perfect government. Experience has proved that no position is more false than this. The ancient democracies in which the people themselves deliberated never possessed one good feature of government. Their very character was tyranny; their figure deformity." - Alexander Hamilton "Between a balanced republic and a democracy, the difference is like that between order and chaos." - John Marshall "The experience of all former ages had shown that of all human governments, democracy was the most unstable, fluctuating and short-lived." - John Quincy Adams
1
@g.6991 How do you teach a lesson if there is no struggle for the lesson to be taught? Why would anyone sympathize with Sokka then? Are you a brainlet?
1
Another day another twitter nutjob self-reporting their projections and demonstrating once again leftism is incredibly racist.
1
Cause its militia violence supported tacitly by the DNC.
1
As a Christian, I love non-Christians calling it out that when you do explicitly anti-Christian things, you aren't a Christian.
1
She's not a pastor, as she's a woman, she's just a heretic who can't read the Bible.
1
Wasn't Hooters also trying to do some strange DEI stuff? I swear I recall hearing something about that going on.
1
Borders, crime, and economy matter more and even the young and healthy democrats are fools, all of them just hate America.
1
She's not a pastor because foremost she's a women, the Bible explicitly tells us she can't be one. She's also not a Christian as she's a heretic.
1
Alec Baldwin shot a woman after harassing gun owners for years about it being evil to own guns and no civilian is capable to own a gun, said "every production needs a cop on set to deal with the guns" when his armorer for his production that he is the executive producer of said she was scared of loading the guns and had no idea what she was doing as a 24 year old. And there was no cop on the set of the shooting. He then threatened the director and cinematographer for seeking another take and then shot the gun hitting both of them and killing the cinematographer.
1
Asmon probably should also pay attention to our own language as well, because these nutjobs are doing the same thing and trying to force everyone to comply, that's what the whole they/them bullcrap is about, it is actually legitimately bad English, it ruins the capacity to understand the subject of the pronoun, and it most certainly is not valid for a qualifying a specific individual, that's not its purpose.
1
She's not a Christian anyway, women can't be pastors, someone who refuses to the follow the rulebook doesn't get to claim allegiance to the principal of the rulebook.
1
@Wolf-fighter Its a bias effect, the more you bias the scales, the more prominent the incompetence of that specific bias has to become since you are simply looking for any compatible body to fill the slot, as a result it fuels the blaming of women which isn't even technically incorrect, the consequence of tipping the scales has a tendency to produce an opposite effect, the cobra effect in action. By the way a lot of the reason this happens is directly because of the Civil Rights Act.
1
That might work for some versions of the Joker (though he looks terrible) but this is supposed to be the Arkham Joker...not that the idea makes sense for Brainiac.
1
Funny thing to point out, the evidence for anthropogenic (this means human-sourced or primarily human caused) climate change is really spotty, but if you simply question antropogenic climate change, you're still be called a climate denier regardless, no matter if you say "I think the climate does change, I just don't think humans are all that relevant". For example, look into the Earth magnetosphere's degradation over the past decade, there is not a single prominent climate change model by mainstream sources that accounts for the impact of the magnetosphere and very few of them consider the sun to have a massive impact on the Earth. And even if anthropogenic climate change were provable, which I might add it relies on a non-falsifiable prognosis in the current models, how are they then sure that its apocalyptic, they've made claims going back to the 80s of running out of food, running out of space, and majority of the population drowning. Does no one remember the crap Al Gore said? Its functionally just another form Malthusianism ignoring evidences that counter the claim and having little evidence that supports it. These people are brainlets.
1
Its called disparate impact law, its legal so long as you're a minority.
1
This is basically the entire Republican party in Louisiana.
1
Gender neutral is itself a mentally ill position, if you have to force other people to speak only a certain way by force, you're most certainly mentally ill.
1
They can't because disparate impact law is mandatory discrimination in preference for minorities, (if you don't do this, you'll be sued for it) this is what the Civil Rights Act did, and its why DEI took over the corporate world.
1
He ain't leaving because he's got free rent in the lefties' heads.
1
Blame the Civil Rights Act, its called disparate outcome law, look it up, it requires by definition discrimination to function, if you don't you can be sued millions of dollars, that's where DEI comes from.
1