Comments by "George Albany" (@Spartan322) on "Real Engineering" channel.

@devins9894 Depends on how often the false positives happen, given the threshold for the indicator urgency protocol and the general disregard for the early warning, that rather suggests that the issue isn't with the pilots being lackadaisical so much as that the Osprey's chip indicator has a notably flawed implementation. Course there is also the question of whether the higher risk of military aircraft reduces the threshold in general by nature of the more risky objectives they partake in alongside a more hostile environment. But given that early so considered false positives may in fact not be false positives in what should be a very normal environment, I would suggest that indicates that normal environment false positives are too common or the procedure itself was too relaxed on the warning signs. So it depends.
35