Comments by "George Albany" (@Spartan322) on "Louis Rossmann"
channel.
-
1
-
Just gonna state, people have natural affinities as part of physical, emotional, mental, and even spiritual traits, (as a result of both nurture and nature, so in a sense you are incorrect there people do have natural things they can or are good at) these determine talents for which you can become significantly more proficient at then if you start at something for which those traits of the affinities don't apply.
Let me pull an example from myself: I wasn't born with a natural capability to understand programming and software, nor to develop games. However I was born with an inherent love of math and problem solving and have a high knack for it, (and as well other inherent capabilities that associate with software development) making my logical thinking capabilities considerably effective for those type of things. Mix in the fact that I developed a personal (uneducated) interest in philosophic concepts, writing/narratives, video games, and social design, it became part of my character for me to build up to wanting to work on software and games. It becomes a natural extension of my original developed traits for me to become a developer/designer. In part it helped to build to that point by desiring devotion into that subject, but I was already way more efficient and effective at learning the environment then many (won't say all, but I can say most) of my peers pushing me ahead of the curve for such. Doesn't mean I'm the best or that great, nor that I end up superior to those who took longer, but it did mean that my specific traits gives me a better advantage in certain specific cases. (especially compared to other fields I could try)
This generally applies to every human to some degree, we all have specific fields we are most effective in as a natural result, regardless of the passion we take for them. Some people don't want to go into those fields for any number of reasons, but that's the truth, they don't need to go into it and perhaps they're better for it, but in most cases its usually the most effective and efficient path. Others often refuse to acknowledge this, but as expertise and specialization in the economy expands, this detail and competition is going to become more pronounced and necessary and it will become harder to oppose participation in your fields according to your natural talents. And in some cases folks will stunt their natural talents lacking proper recognition or practice in what may actually be their best field. This is generally why apprenticeships were considered superior to a centralized education before the late 19th century.
1
-
This is why putting government in the problem is stupid, right to repair doesn't need to be solved by government because the issue it tries to solve was created by government, patents and IP law are infringements upon individual rights because you can not own an idea, manifested object, something with practical and functional existence can be owned, but a concept or idea can not be for it is not manifested. It requires active systems that can encroach upon personal liberties since someone could devise a unique object that infringes that infringes someone's conceptions, but how can you validate ownership without government? You can't. By having the government forbid replication of good ideas implemented badly you are encouraging monopolies that ARE GOVERNMENT ENFORCED. And the only people that can take advantage of the monopoly system are those with the money, thus monopolies follow money. Monopolies die when government is left out. This applies for all IP law, film, software, books, music, none of them have to truly compete against superior skill and talent, once someone has been registered with the government, they can coast on it and rip everyone off. Bandaid solutions don't fix the problem, IP law and patents need to die. (and we know for a fact that neither patent, copyright, or trademark are enforced by someone without money, also trademark and copyright can be socially enforced, as that generally happens naturally especially with the internet, Streamlabs is the perfect example of that)
1
-
This is why putting government in the problem is stupid, right to repair doesn't need to be solved by government because the issue it tries to solve was created by government, patents and IP law are infringements upon individual rights because you can not own an idea, manifested object, something with practical and functional existence can be owned, but a concept or idea can not be for it is not manifested. It requires active systems that can encroach upon personal liberties since someone could devise a unique object that infringes that infringes someone's conceptions, but how can you validate ownership without government? You can't. By having the government forbid replication of good ideas implemented badly you are encouraging monopolies that ARE GOVERNMENT ENFORCED. And the only people that can take advantage of the monopoly system are those with the money, thus monopolies follow money. Monopolies die when government is left out. This applies for all IP law, film, software, books, music, none of them have to truly compete against superior skill and talent, once someone has been registered with the government, they can coast on it and rip everyone off. Bandaid solutions don't fix the problem, IP law and patents need to die. (and we know for a fact that neither patent, copyright, or trademark are enforced by someone without money, also trademark and copyright can be socially enforced, as that generally happens naturally especially with the internet, Streamlabs is the perfect example of that)
1
-
1
-
First off, the government contract these trains, they never once audited these trains, neither did they perform any test for DRM behaviors, (which yes can be easily tested for) and neither did the government make any contracts that made DRM a violation of said contracts. What the goddamn hell do you think is gonna happen when you do literally nothing, if you're so stupid that you don't perform anything to actively counteract this behavior, no amount of law will fix this, Louis Rossman you are a completely fool, the laws will not fix this issue, the problem is that people like you don't put any time into solving the problem through free market processes because you are children and need government handholding, keep your stupid New York sensibilities out of this, free market forces can and has absolutely fix this if you idiots stop being lazy ass morons who also supports IP law. Your position is complete bullcrap, it violates individual rights, you don't have a right to be provided for, you don't have a right to be given a product, you only have a right to elect the product you wish to have, if none fit, the free market will solve it, you just don't understand crap about basic economics, socialist policies do not work.
1
-
I don't agree that there is a right to repair, (the only right in regards to business is to freely operate a business and own property that doesn't infringe inherent divine rights) but I do agree with the principle to repair, where a company should be praised and uplifted for implementing repairable features for their products. (market rewards, not legislative control) Though it be better to standardize interchangeable hardware and software for specific purposes and sell the results of said standards, non-standard parts and systems should only exist for one-off or experimental tech. This is a valid case for suckless/Unix principles, you do one simple thing well, effectively, and efficiently, and nothing more, don't add to existing things, build off its basis separately. If you can't build off it separately, add a simplified manner to build off it separately. (yes I know its not fully suckless, that's mostly Unix, but you should aim to be suckless but at minimum be Unix)
1
-
Its not New York, its rulers, politicians, and bureaucrats of this age, they are not your friends, they don't care about you, you can't vote in good people, they hate you and want to own you as slaves, if you want to fix the problem, the government must be replaced, a corrupt Republic can not be fixed, it can only be burned down and replaced with a moral one. It reflect your morals, the morals of the people. You want this fixed? Don't give the government power, stop giving them things they have no right to have, don't give them property, don't give them control over the economy, don't let them regulate healthcare, welfare, business, property, ownership, or anything else, they are not there for you to live better, they are there to restrain those who violate your rights. If you are stranded on an island, you have been given all the rights you could have, anything you don't have there is not a right, if some violates what you have then they have violated your rights, a right can not be violated if no one is there to violate it. This is why things like "right to repair" is a damn joke, its a socialist enslavement.
1
-
1