Comments by "George Albany" (@Spartan322) on "William C. Fox"
channel.
-
Just gonna point out the EU is mostly responsible for economic turnover that tends to affect the UK that causes disparity issues because it is the top of the five powerhouse nations paying exclusively for its continuation, (most of the other nations are a drain on it because most of the other nations can't support themselves without the EU) until Brexit were to finish that is still the issue, if the people are desperate, the government is unable to provide through its taxation of the moneymaking aspects of the society. That is why the EU is an economic problem for the UK, its the first nation to experience its economic instability caused by federalizing of power both politically and economically, however this issue is inevitable economically to each nation state, its similar to using welfare to support people who don't work and provides a drain on the economy without enough benefits to warrant desiring it. (that wasn't the original design of the European project btw)
I'm also gonna point out that the migration to the UK had good reason to be a skeptical issue, diversity was not Europe's strong suit, diversity in thought perhaps, but racial diversity is a poison to the cohesion of a sovereign, the reason is biologic, we (and many organic beings in fact) are built to identify with a genetically and biologically similar group who has customs and culture similar to our own. Europe is a perfect example of this, its one reason why Islam never made it into any nation state of Europe en-mass until the 21st century. However another issue crops up under this problem. Europe is inherently individual liberalist, as in defers to the values of the individual liberalism ideology built upon Christian Protestantism, its inherently and diametrically opposed to Islamic values which defer to hyper authoritarian conservationism built upon Arab Islam manners, this in itself creates the first true point of contention that has nothing to do with religion. (anyone who claims that it is will be using an agenda to push a narrative that is unsupported by factual evidence) There's also a cultural issue with Arabs and Africans, for they perform such behaviors as incestual interbreeding, beating, whipping, and otherwise unjustified violent actions against both women and children, and they commit to pedophilia and other sexually perverse manners. These instinctual malpractices in culture overall further develop unintelligent, under-developed, poor tempered, violent miscreants that resolve to authority issues and sociopathy, they are unsympathetic generally and have an inability to foresee their own actions and understand the significance of them. Until they resolve those issues mass migration of migrants isn't gonna solve anything, it merely makes crime and violence worse and increases economical and sociopolitical issues in any region it happens to. That is why migration has skeptics. Those who claim intolerance and such are more so educated in the ideals of propaganda instituted likely from the state and don't understand biological, logical, nor economic reasons for disliking mass migration, especially illegal migration. If you need an example where that fails look at China towns in the US, in a free society where legal migration is the only right migration that would tend to happen a lot more, and only as a society becomes more genetically homogeneous does it tend to decrease slightly. That is to say homogeneous mixing happens enough for it to, it can take a long while and the more genetically diverse the worse the problem is, it took the German, Irish, and Dutch towns and villages in the US over 80 years before they homogenized enough to not be considered purely on ethnic and they're actually very genetically similar, Africans and Arabs are very genetically distinct from Europeans, not even to mention the Asian and Jews, who also promote and greatly prefer genetic purity. (in the sense of staying ethnically pure of anyone that isn't them, not deigning to believe they're superior) You also can't force this, when you do you actually create a huge amount psychological, economic, sociopolitical, and such issues that we have barely scratched the surface on. But the fact we know barely (and what we do know is its extremely terrible) how damaging forcing homogeneous genetic mixing is to the majority of a populous just means a term of genetic diversity is one of the worst forms of anti-biologic propaganda we've yet designed. At least diversity of thought doesn't have this issue however.
1
-
1
-
1