Comments by "Magnús Örn" (@magnusorn7313) on "Перенаселение и Африка" video.

@johnroberts8233 industrialization is the largest factor to population growth rates
1
because oh how slow culture reacts to industrialization and development, the longer they stay developing the longer its going to be like that its not racist to bring this up because its not unique to any one place, the same is seen for any ethnicity when their society industrialized, only exception being when war enters the equation
1
claim 1: the concentration of co2 and other carbon based molecules in the atmosphere has increased due to human activity claim 2: its observed that co2 and other carbon based molecules absorbs thermal radiation and emits it as heat in the atmosphere if you deny either of these you are a dogmatic shill who denies basic verifiable science, if you dont deny them then you are accepting that co2 and other carbon based molecules have a direct impact on temperature
1
@stantorren4400 either you are in on destroying neolibs or you are not, the ongoing exploitation of developing nations is an unforgivable evil
1
@stantorren4400 social democracies still rely on the exploitation of developing nations i definitely think social democracy is an improvement to neoliberalism, but if i go shopping or a shirt the majority of the shits stores have likely come from some sweatshop, and the fabric is produced by exploited workers too every day i use items produced through brutal exploitation i dont want to, but under capitalism cheaper products outcompete their competitors
1
because most of them died before they reached the age where they could have their own children
1
actually no, governments can certainly boost the improvement of the economy for example, by forming a division in charge of making road systems efficient and they use tax money to construct this network, this network could boost trade and all sorts of logistics would benefit
1
@TheMNTK thats factually wrong though universal healthcare is much cheaper and more cost effective than private healthcare have you also heard of banana republics? if you have please describe how the road network typically looks in one
1
@TheMNTK im sorry if you dont like it but the truth simply is that public healthcare is cheaper the tax taken out of my income for healthcare is less than the money taken out of my disposable income in a place where i earn as much but have to use private healthcare and at least for the US its the same for the average citizen they too would save under a system like the one i have
1
@TheMNTK Germany is funded by statutory contributions, ensuring free healthcare for all so yes, technically its not public healthcare but they do have universal healthcare also a quick glance at the countries included in the Commonwealth Fund’s survey reveals that Canada’s failure is not intrinsic to universal health care
1
@TheMNTK im not from the country im in, chill mate and hold back your assumptions your viewpoint at least in my opinion stems from you not trusting government due to fear of corruption and abuse of the system yes thats an issue, but its not if you use a transparent and regulated system
1
@TheMNTK before i move on ta answer, can i get confirmation on the alternative you are suggesting, are you a minarchist or a full anarchist?
1
@TheMNTK can you point to a well functioning anarcho-capitalist society?
1
@TheMNTK so a country with a population of 2.... also when talking about education first we should cover price ranges and also where and the school thing is dumb ok lets take your argument as a win, and we do away with all public schools, do you think the country will become more or less educated? no not at all, many people wont go to school, they cant afford it, that or they go to schools that cost next to nothing and are literal garbage schools arent supposed to be for profit, they are meant to educate a population selling cars is for profit trains are for connecting up a country boats are for profit healthcare is for keeping a population healthy by maximizing profit on things that shouldnt be for profit, you make them less effective at doing what their purpose is making all education public would generate a caste system where the wealthy can give their children quality education separating them from the poor who cant learn how to handle their finances or how to do well paid skilled labor because their parents didnt know how to handle finances or how to do well paid skilled labor
1
 @TheMNTK who said i don like profit? what i dont like is children who remain poor and uneducated because their parents couldnt afford school
1
@TheMNTK yes, you get a higher level education ON AVERAGE but public healthcare can provide just as much of the same if not better quality education, but its statistically dragged down, why? because its universal, there is more people, overall the country is more educated learn to not be taken advantage of by those who know how to show statistics and have them mean something other than what they actually represent
1
@TheMNTK so you think people in finland or the UK are better educated?
1
@TheMNTK because the public schools on one country are not at all comparable to all other public schools you do realize that right? there is a huge difference in quality of public schools in america and europe
1
its almost like being politically and societaly torn apart, economically torn down to object poverty and then abandoned into arbitrarily divided up nations leads to things not going so well
1