General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Magnús Örn
PowerfulJRE
comments
Comments by "Magnús Örn" (@magnusorn7313) on "Joe Rogan Experience #1330 - Bernie Sanders" video.
and not paying to use youtube is a good thing
2
people would maybe start doing that if they didnt thing climate change was only political debate
2
care to show statistics on that
1
better than no truths
1
@andrewselbyphotography " part that's authoritarian." as you said that part was the lies
1
@andrewselbyphotography is it authoritarian to ban nukes? is it authoritarian for the government to use taxes to fund road construction and maintenance? is it authoritarian to allow children in poverty to attend school if they couldnt otherwise?
1
@andrewselbyphotography through taxes but is it bad? if the government had never build roads and left it to the people to do it then most of america today would still be farms darted about with a few resource extracting operations scattered about and the only paces with roads would be these resource extracting locations, and the roads would go straight towards where they could be exported are you saying tax funded roads are bad?
1
@andrewselbyphotography and how is the first one not authoritarian when banning assault fire arms is?
1
@andrewselbyphotography "if i choose not to pay my taxes I go to jail, hence authoritarian." so you are saying even if the people only paid enough tax to fund defense and road maintenance and that was all the government did they would still be authoritarian if you where arrested for not paying taxes? "civilians don't have access to nukes." BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT ALLOWED TO, NUKES ARE ALREADY BANNED It's illegal under 18 USC 831 to possess "nuclear material" without specific authorization. "Or do you mean that the government banning nukes for civilians is authoritarian? Well, here's how I look at it" ok, so you agree that banning nukes is authoritarian, now here is the next question, is it a good thing that nukes are banned? "just owning it can infringe on other's rights if there were to be a radiation leak." yeah fuck, if you had a shitty fucking nuke with its core exposed "something there with global peace agreements and classified technology." 1. what is the difference between a global peace agreement and the government banning something? 2. isnt classifying technology infringing on peoples rights?
1
@seandilallo8718 so can capitalists, unless you intent to strip that right away
1
"Until then, stop with the doomsday talk." essentially "yes, i know children are being murdered, but dont go around taxing ME so you can have a police force to stop it"
1
@trypl-syx because combating climate change will save lives lives are worth more than your money
1
@trypl-syx and nothing natural about a sudden spike in temperature rising by a whole degree within just 100 years
1
one is able to form sentences and does not lie 30% of the time even when there is no reason to lie
1
but did it work?
1
@sagnorm1863 exactly, and that was the point logan, what the fuck, you say it didnt work but it shows here that it did
1
show the statistics on that
1
"has lived a life being funded by the public funding him and his agenda" okay so what? al gore used planes and such to get around, they arent great for the environment, but his affect on people still helped the environment well beyond enough to make up for that so again, your point? "He has become rich off the back off people in this country" so has EVERY politician EVER "He wants to put more power under the wings of the government but he doesn’t have any answers for hard questions and admits it" how do these two specifically tie into eachother? yes he wants the goverment to be more regulated and regulating what specific hard questions are you speaking of? " We need and deserve smarter people running for office." if only you had a working republic, except its corrupt and evil "Forcing other people give up their money is a problem." would you rather if the government never build roads? how advanced do you think america would be if all roads had to be privately funded? yeah, pretty backwards "On the other hand people willfully give their money to projects and charities is a what a great society has at its heart." under what objective view? so greedy people have more money?
1
@just_incase6071 "companies that work honestly" those dont exist in america
1
@just_incase6071 no one is forcing you to buy anything, you can be the only person selling a pill that cures cancer with a production cost of two dollars but sell each bill for two million and no one is being forced to buy anything but thats not really working honest you could be a supermarket chain and buy out all the other ones and then hitch up the prices so all supermarkets are crazy expensive, is that honest? they arent forcing anyone
1
https://ourworldindata.org/exports/five-year-survival-rates-from-lung-cancer_v1_850x600.svg wow look, on par with south africa https://ourworldindata.org/exports/five-year-survival-rate-from-liver-cancer_v1_850x600.svg huh, theres canda, and whats that? argentina? https://ourworldindata.org/exports/five-year-survival-rates-from-breast-cancer_v1_850x600.svg wow wow, seems to be good odds here its especially surprising europe is doing so well since they have a lot more of it to deal with https://www.coffeeandhealth.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Graphic-1-cancer-in-europe.jpg?w=640 maybe america is doing so well when it comes to cancer is because they have such big pharma, hard to not aim for statistics when you are ballin in that much wealth
1
"killed them" being loud and unintelligible
1
@weekendatronnies6286 "he destroyed Clinton in debates" anyone could do that if you pit two drinks against each other and one wins that does not mean the one who won is a fucking champion warrior " he’s a better public speaker than any politician hands down" http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2017/11/trump-babbles-incoherently-while-attempting-to-read-speech.html https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/06/10/president-trump-has-made-false-or-misleading-claims-over-days/ " the Democrats are scared of debates with Trump" what backs that claim?
1
"socialism without liberty leads to brutality and slavery." so since tax funded roads are socialism, and the government does that, and not being allowed to kill people is removing liberties then you already have a socialist government that represses liberties thats how soft your argument is, define socialism and libreties
1