Comments by "Magnús Örn" (@magnusorn7313) on "PBS Eons" channel.

  1. lol no desperate for anything that can be taken out of context to mean what you want
    6
  2. you are really having a hard time with the concept of time humans and chimps cant mate, theres your macro evolution for you
    5
  3.  @kingpen  fossils say that we were and so does dna we are very genetically similar to chimps we are much less similar to horses
    5
  4. to be fair we lost out hair way before we went out of africa and we havent been out of africa for all that long
    4
  5.  @klaede9666  but we are the ones already going agaisnt the climate by changing it, we should allow the natural climate change which happens over millions of years and not centuries like the change we have inflicted
    3
  6. there is no claim here that humanity is descended from just 2 people im sorry you are too dumb to understand that
    3
  7. what is neo darwinism? is it a new racist group in the USA?
    2
  8. so in this scenario you are assuming all other people that arent dwarfs just jump into the ocean instead of being buried?
    2
  9.  @UncleMichaelable  this is bait, either you are a troll or just stupid, the only "lower version" here is you
    2
  10. we would be the andals and the first men would be the neanderthals
    2
  11. what designed the designer?
    2
  12. humans are creatures
    2
  13. never heard that, i heard though that civilization in the area didnt adapt well enough due to poor agricultural practices
    2
  14. every fossil is a transitional fossil because change never stops
    2
  15. what about it?
    2
  16.  @THESEADOG82  then the answer is a long list including sapiens, heidelbergensis, erectus, habilis, australopithercus which i dont know if i spelled right, rimidus and schalanthorpus tcadensis or whatever
    2
  17.  @darude2893  consider that life had a long time to adapt
    2
  18. depends, because currently we are a very huge species and that means changes will take a LONG time to be apparent, but one small change wont be much i think that if we decide to reclassify it will happen through the process of gene editing and cyber enhancements, at first it will just be speculations on reclassifying, then more people will be talking about it, and then some people will say its time and politics get involved and then eventually we will decide that the change is enough to justify changing from "homo sapien"
    2
  19. because that has nothing to do with the history of how we know about evolution its a part of evolutionary history
    2
  20. sorry but you might have to go on ice for a while to see anything like that to happen
    2
  21.  @Mike-zj5ww  chimps and humans, boom,
    2
  22. yes but that didnt encompass the why humans have know that a compass points north for a long time but how long was it until we understood why or how
    2
  23. we are working on it, we might accidentally harm the whole player base through the process however
    2
  24. no, but we could speed up the process like with dogs, they evolved differently than modern wolves because they were isolated from them over time but it was speed up a lot through artificial selection, we would consciously chose to let the strong, healthy and cooperative ones to breed and yes it did still take some time to domesticate them but then we get to the modern useless unhealthy dogs we have a lot of dog breeds that are not very useful, Chihuahuas, bulldogs, bloodhounds and so on we bred them over a shorter time span which involved a lot of inbreeding which severely affected them but it was a lot of change over not so long of a time
    2
  25. so you are just going to ignore the 99,5% similar dna and everything else that backs the out of africa theory?
    2
  26. climate change is not essential for evolution, the only thing essential for evolution is that the world does not end along with all forms of life, as long as some form of life exists then evolution will be at play
    2
  27. who says humans are the only thing that can cause climate change? no one says that
    2
  28. yea but a specie is a man made term so its very weak at actually defining stuff
    2
  29. i think you commented on the wrong video, no?
    1
  30. no because they also have mixtures from other unidentified hominids that Eurasians dont have
    1
  31. we are all africans
    1
  32. if you expand via east and west you encounter the same climate and can use the same crops and expect the same weather, thats why russia is so big and why other empires got so big most big empires are horizontal, alexander the great, rome
    1
  33. yes, well, its more like, if you have a black and asian parent you are a mix, but they are both human identifying neandethals as being a different species was before we knew we bred with them the definition of a species is pretty weak becasue its a man made concept but they were technically just an ethnic group but like, multitudes more different from us that the differences that exist between modern ethnic groups
    1
  34. how does the neanderthal dna blow this out of the water? that reaffirms the out of africa theory
    1
  35. no climate scientist disputes that, your point?
    1
  36. north or south from where?
    1
  37.  @osonhouston  there was water south, we have archaeological finds in the south but its not as old as the central finds
    1
  38. farthing?
    1
  39. we know for sure homo sapiens have been around for 200k years but other dates are still not that solid so we stick with the 200k
    1
  40. i see you also comment without understanding what you are talking about
    1
  41. are you saying its bad hat they found the killer?
    1
  42.  @amosmoses5630  why was the way they went about it bad?
    1
  43. the real questions
    1
  44. well its not a land bridge but more of a lot of ice they could walk on
    1
  45.  @KateeAngel  because we can look at ice at the poles to see how the weather might have been and we can examine fossils at either side
    1
  46. bacteria and sugars
    1
  47. maybe they did, we just dont have the fossil evidence if they did
    1
  48. the fossils we dig up were there
    1
  49. looooots and looots of data, hypothesis building and then rigorously trying to prove those hypotheses wrong until you end up with a couple dozen that you cant disprove, and then you try to form an overarching theory that explains all of the hypotheses and then you test that as well and if eventually when you you find a mistake you fix it this goes on forever, sometimes theories only need small fixing, every once in a while, like Einsteins theories which are more or less correct just not 100% perfect, and sometimes theories can go out the window but this is muuuuuch less common
    1
  50. sweet, cave in Antarctica are survivable then
    1
  51. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aNcuIqpq11c
    1
  52. their are
    1
  53.  @franknash7878  believe what?
    1
  54.  @franknash7878  define numerous and races
    1
  55.  @franknash7878  there is only one living human species
    1
  56. listen man, we have been over this, they are both reptiles
    1
  57.  @dvdextras-byvincentcorani9136  well ill be
    1
  58. we have evidence of humans further back in north america but its recent so its not included
    1
  59. where?
    1
  60. why wouldn't there Well there is
    1
  61. language evolves slang is a part of that, how do you think we even have the word 'slang' it was slang for 'shortened language' but slang stuck around and its a valid word
    1
  62. earliest evidence we have
    1
  63. yes but that makes it hard to talk about actual halves of it
    1
  64. no ones is saying tht the earth wont recover, its humans that people are worried about
    1
  65. not similar since homo sapiens are very homogeneous
    1
  66. do we have his skeleton? if we dont that might be a part of the issue, but yes, preservation is a big part
    1
  67. a brother, an uncle ect
    1
  68. counting upwards its a straight line of men if you count downwards its like a river delta
    1
  69. how would it complicate things? it actually makes it easier to prove the out of africa theory because sub saharan population do no have the 1-5% neanderthal dna found in populations outside of africa
    1
  70. do you mean human as in homo sapien or human as in hominid?
    1
  71.  @THESEADOG82  you didnt answer my question
    1
  72. hasnt been debunked though
    1
  73.  @charlieindigo  evolution is observed
    1
  74. what do you mean?
    1
  75.  @deepashtray5605  oh okay, i misunderstood what you meant
    1
  76. no
    1
  77. thats why all migration by boat is still speculation
    1
  78. depending on the definition but yea
    1
  79. 'cavemen' they were tribal we have uncontacted tribes that still use stone age tools who know how to build boats
    1
  80. not to mention the distance was shorter due to lower sea levels
    1
  81. no, other males married into the line, and she could also have had children with more than just one man
    1
  82. so do native americans
    1
  83. who says the earth is that simple? there are many variables that impact the climate, co2 concentrations is just one of them, this is why you should stop being a clown and let actual educated people talk about the sciences
    1
  84. not to mention that the first civilization that we KNOW of is from the middle east, we have reason to believe some civilizations were made in africa before but are gone now
    1
  85. if there is a whole generation of just men then they cant reproduce and humanity would just die out
    1
  86. no, just like how they are not remnants of neanderthal lineage
    1
  87. so the wipe out just ignored africa?
    1
  88.  @JoseSilveira-newhandleforYT  well if everything was wiped out something had to have been left or we would be gone
    1
  89. what does this have to do with anything?
    1
  90. well we dont know that, we know they had parts with and parts without feathers, we dont know the ratio or where on the body it covered
    1
  91. the fossils are not speculations, how they got there is speculations based on evidence
    1
  92. thats in terms of feeding everyone but humans use a lot more resources that just food and they are not all as plentiful
    1
  93. we cant find a teapot floating around in space therefore there is no teapot flying around in space
    1
  94. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aNcuIqpq11c
    1
  95. they compare it to related species and other bones they have of the sames species what do you mean with only 1 bone?
    1
  96. the whole point is there is not a lot of evidence its archaeology although its most certainly likely that they spread out across northern america first
    1
  97. you just didnt get the video im sorry it has to do with statistics and unbroken lines
    1
  98. we arent trying to stop climate change, we are trying to not cause it its like the difference between stopping a baby from being kicked, and not kicking a baby
    1
  99.  C Maybe  considering the deforestation rates... meeeeh, you know
    1
  100. all animals have mitochondria
    1
  101. even plants
    1
  102. life got it back around the time when we only had single cell organisms
    1
  103. 1:28
    1
  104. boom
    1
  105. there is but its very recent that we started looking into it
    1
  106. "happen" as if it was an event, no, diversity happens through isolation over time, as long as people are divided from each other then a division is happening since all humans share 99,5% identical dna with each other there hasnt been that much deviation
    1
  107.  @KateeAngel  no, because if you examine whites and asians the genetic diference is less than what you might find between two isolated tribes in africa, over two thirds of all genetic diversity is found inside africa thats because these divisions started long before sapiens made it to europe
    1
  108. well i dont have an answer why homo sapiens are the only ones left but i can explain the genetic diversity it comes down to how genetic diversity happens in the first place which is isolation over time, but since humans migrate a lot there is a constant gene flow between the whole species around 1/3 of the entire genetic diversity of humans is in africa, because the terrain gives way to isolated people groups, this added to the fact that humans are from africa then thats a lot of isolation and a lot of time but not enough isolation, and not enough time humanity has a large population, which means that if one person has a small beneficial mutation and they end up having 3 children, thats 3 out of 7 billion, maybe all of these children also have 3 children so now we have a total of 9 people in this generation with that trait (and thats not taking into account the probability of passing down any single trait) but at this point humanity has grown to 8 billion you can see that for humanity right now, for any genetic change to happen we would need a significantly smaller population
    1
  109. did they? they did show the possible migration path people may have taken to get to india how old is the oldest human fossil in india?
    1
  110.  @vamsimohan5369  what should he have discussed?
    1
  111. because it takes isolation over time to diversify as in if you have a population of 100 in a town there wont be any diversity happening but if you split the population into 50 people in two towns that cant interact with each other then they will diversify its the same with things like culture which diversify based on isolation over time
    1
  112. no because what we are tracing is a mutation that their parents did not have
    1
  113. you say that but we wouldnt know that
    1
  114.  @bordenfleetwood5773  "Such an individual may just as likely be capable of blending in completely in modern society" may not definitely would
    1
  115. humans have been there longer but its well known that humans have been there at least since 16k
    1
  116. it might not be, we just dont have the fossils that say so
    1
  117. no thats where you are wrong that IS what we see in the fossil records
    1
  118. well yea, now we just need to prove they exist
    1
  119. "intelligent"
    1
  120. did they gloss over it? i think they covered it in more nuance than you bring
    1
  121. it would just be speculations, best to cover stuff like that in stuff like podcasts
    1
  122. you would though, because of plastic but i get your point
    1
  123. the fictional hobbits have rather large feet
    1
  124. "How can you say that they did or did not think that others were or were not different" because they mated
    1
  125. we can observe similarities and not that they collide with 3 things dna, duration separation from other similar species, and fossil records
    1
  126. Ok ok inbreeding is the best. I got it thanks
    1
  127. we have fossils for sure but the oldest european fossils are not in france or spain
    1
  128. does not explain the archaic features
    1
  129. faulty copying
    1
  130. its gone up 1 degree in the last 100 years but up to at most half of that could be excused as the end of the mini ice age and thats only at most
    1
  131. primarchs?
    1
  132. why do you see it so black and white? no one claims humans are the only thing that can cause change
    1
  133. politics?
    1
  134. first meme was sharpening rocks by banging them against other rocks
    1
  135. no
    1
  136. well actually, maybe the hair part, but not the skin
    1
  137.  @somkit9102  well how light are we talking here, the middle east is very light compared to sub Saharan africans
    1
  138. sugar
    1
  139.  @TheEVEInspiration  they werent the ones to "colonize" (wreck) their own land
    1
  140.  @TheEVEInspiration  yes, colonizing does not = wrecking, thats why i put colonize in quotation marks
    1
  141. "older" archaic and he did mention it, just not neanderthals by name
    1
  142. thats evolutionary history, not evolution apple =/= apple pie evolutionary history is harder to observe because we cant observe it first hand
    1
  143. diversity has nothing to do with age, its about how long two groups have been isolated from each other
    1
  144. they have to use archaeology and biology stand together because we dont have dna from people back then unless they are very well perserved
    1
  145. preservation
    1