Comments by "Magnús Örn" (@magnusorn7313) on "When We Took Over the World" video.

  1. we would be the andals and the first men would be the neanderthals
    2
  2. depends, because currently we are a very huge species and that means changes will take a LONG time to be apparent, but one small change wont be much i think that if we decide to reclassify it will happen through the process of gene editing and cyber enhancements, at first it will just be speculations on reclassifying, then more people will be talking about it, and then some people will say its time and politics get involved and then eventually we will decide that the change is enough to justify changing from "homo sapien"
    2
  3. we are working on it, we might accidentally harm the whole player base through the process however
    2
  4. so you are just going to ignore the 99,5% similar dna and everything else that backs the out of africa theory?
    2
  5. i think you commented on the wrong video, no?
    1
  6. we are all africans
    1
  7. if you expand via east and west you encounter the same climate and can use the same crops and expect the same weather, thats why russia is so big and why other empires got so big most big empires are horizontal, alexander the great, rome
    1
  8. how does the neanderthal dna blow this out of the water? that reaffirms the out of africa theory
    1
  9. north or south from where?
    1
  10.  @osonhouston  there was water south, we have archaeological finds in the south but its not as old as the central finds
    1
  11. we know for sure homo sapiens have been around for 200k years but other dates are still not that solid so we stick with the 200k
    1
  12. well its not a land bridge but more of a lot of ice they could walk on
    1
  13.  @KateeAngel  because we can look at ice at the poles to see how the weather might have been and we can examine fossils at either side
    1
  14. bacteria and sugars
    1
  15. maybe they did, we just dont have the fossil evidence if they did
    1
  16. the fossils we dig up were there
    1
  17. we have evidence of humans further back in north america but its recent so its not included
    1
  18. where?
    1
  19. earliest evidence we have
    1
  20. how would it complicate things? it actually makes it easier to prove the out of africa theory because sub saharan population do no have the 1-5% neanderthal dna found in populations outside of africa
    1
  21. what do you mean?
    1
  22.  @deepashtray5605  oh okay, i misunderstood what you meant
    1
  23. thats why all migration by boat is still speculation
    1
  24. not to mention that the first civilization that we KNOW of is from the middle east, we have reason to believe some civilizations were made in africa before but are gone now
    1
  25. so the wipe out just ignored africa?
    1
  26.  @JoseSilveira-newhandleforYT  well if everything was wiped out something had to have been left or we would be gone
    1
  27. well we dont know that, we know they had parts with and parts without feathers, we dont know the ratio or where on the body it covered
    1
  28. the fossils are not speculations, how they got there is speculations based on evidence
    1
  29. thats in terms of feeding everyone but humans use a lot more resources that just food and they are not all as plentiful
    1
  30. the whole point is there is not a lot of evidence its archaeology although its most certainly likely that they spread out across northern america first
    1
  31. boom
    1
  32. there is but its very recent that we started looking into it
    1
  33. "happen" as if it was an event, no, diversity happens through isolation over time, as long as people are divided from each other then a division is happening since all humans share 99,5% identical dna with each other there hasnt been that much deviation
    1
  34.  @KateeAngel  no, because if you examine whites and asians the genetic diference is less than what you might find between two isolated tribes in africa, over two thirds of all genetic diversity is found inside africa thats because these divisions started long before sapiens made it to europe
    1
  35. did they? they did show the possible migration path people may have taken to get to india how old is the oldest human fossil in india?
    1
  36.  @vamsimohan5369  what should he have discussed?
    1
  37. because it takes isolation over time to diversify as in if you have a population of 100 in a town there wont be any diversity happening but if you split the population into 50 people in two towns that cant interact with each other then they will diversify its the same with things like culture which diversify based on isolation over time
    1
  38. humans have been there longer but its well known that humans have been there at least since 16k
    1
  39. it might not be, we just dont have the fossils that say so
    1
  40. "intelligent"
    1
  41. it would just be speculations, best to cover stuff like that in stuff like podcasts
    1
  42. we have fossils for sure but the oldest european fossils are not in france or spain
    1
  43. politics?
    1
  44. first meme was sharpening rocks by banging them against other rocks
    1
  45. sugar
    1
  46.  @TheEVEInspiration  they werent the ones to "colonize" (wreck) their own land
    1
  47.  @TheEVEInspiration  yes, colonizing does not = wrecking, thats why i put colonize in quotation marks
    1
  48. "older" archaic and he did mention it, just not neanderthals by name
    1