Comments by "†Omni†" (@Human_01) on "I Took an IQ Test to Find Out What it Actually Measures" video.

  1. Intelligence and IQ are not the same thing. Like Joules, IQ is a "unit of measurement" that is supposed to quantify a person's 'intelligence-potential'. As a concept, I think IQ is supposed to quantify the brain's [potential] 'capacity' and 'efficiency' to: 1) Detect quantum-energy (via receptors in the body and brain, e.g. pineal gland [Nx cognitive function]), and then convert it into sensory-data. 2) Covert sensory-data into a [mental] 'concept' that actually represents a component to a [Metaphysical] system that pertains to our understanding and familiarity with perceived reality. related memory of a quantum experience. 3) Ability to integrate a "concept" into a comprehensive [mentally-stimulated] system. So, could IQ be summarised as a unit of measurement that is used to quantify the extent that a conscious-CPU (bio/mechanical brain) can convert quantum-data/stimulus, e.g. light or sound (received via receptors in body and brain)... into [mentally] simulated concepts/simulated-representations _(this factually occurs consciously and subconsciously, e.g. there are subconscious blueprints and neuronal-representation that aligns parts of the nervous system corresponding parts of the limb. A Metaphysical representation and concepts of the limb [like a blue-print] that guides nervous signals through a neural-system to with the corresponding part of the body. [Hint: Phantom limb syndrome and its 'mind/mental-concept to body' mechanics; hence mirror-treatment is effective])..._ ___________ So, yeah, can IQ be summarised as a quantified unit that measures the success rate of a conscious-CPU unit (be it biological-brain, or computational-Ai) performing the following: 1) Detect quantum data/quantum-stimulus (e.g. light through the eye or sound through the ears; you need to detect quantum energy to even experience maths via sight and auditory means). 2) Convert quantum-data/quantum-stimulus into a '[sub]conscious simulation of a concept'; that pertains to a 'memorized' (there is no IQ without memory, period) quantum-experience. Case in point, you need to [sub]consciously form some like of mentally, simulated representation of a memorized quantum-experience/sequence of quantum-stimulus ("memorized" can be both short and long term). *[Fyi, I think the visual cortex, and especially 'LGN' is both active, and necessary (at varying degrees) to most, —if not all forms of physical senses. The info they process is utilized at the conscious and subconscious level, e.g. in phantom limb syndrome, a Metaphysical blueprint/layout data for the limb exists both consciously, and subconsciously. If a [Metaphysical] layout/blueprint of the missing limb did not exist subconsciously, then phantom limb syndrome would not exist... And since *IQ has everything to do with 'quantified [unit] rate of successfully, mentally generating concepts (derived through/experienced through sensory receptors; that were detected as the quantum level), and then efficiently converting them as components [while consciously/subconsciously considering the components properties -into account-] into a [sub/or]conscious 'system'; that is designed to optimise understanding/comprehension of the [memorized] quantum experience/quantum-data (in every context, e.g. sounds or light that carries data, by which meaning can be derived, and then mentally represented [as thou formatted] as a stored/'memorized' as a [Metaphysically; pertaining to mind and reality] simulated, visual component ('LGN'). That visual, component is added to a system designed to facilitate understand, as well as association. That "system" could be and is often in the form of a mental simulation of a quantum experience, e.g. a red-apple.* 3) Successfully integrate the aforementioned '[sub]conscious simulation of a concept' (like a singular component) into a useful (like a tool), mental, 'system' [aid], that is intended to facilitate comprehension of a quantum experience, e.g. the light and sound that was used to convey and express maths. Random note: I think a concept can be defined as a [mentally/virtually] simulated, representation of a [quantum] experience. A [mental/virtual] system could be defined as a series of concepts that are represented as components; that form parts of a 'connected medium', that is designed to facilitate the efficient, 'physical' (the less physical, the less easy it will be to interact with it) flow/transfer of energy/effort (variable form of energy depending on context) through it. ... Meh. IQ is a quantified unit of measurement that pertains to biological CPU/brain capacity to process information into intelligible concepts. IQ is quantified success rate of a biological CPU/brain's capacity to detect, and process information into an intelligible concept.
    1
  2. Is IQ a measure of successful rate of implemented intuition (and maths)?
    1
  3. I think IQ [quantified unit] is a measure of 'success rate of applied intuition, and pattern recognition/rationale' (e.g. in math). Edit: Doesn't all form of intelligence require the aforementioned intuition and pattern recognition? I think the purpose of IQ was to measure the extent of varied forms of processing information that was taught to be crucial to overall, sustainable-intelligence (sufficient enough to allow one to adapt and resolve a problem, perhaps).
    1
  4. Intuition is an important part of IQ. What the IQ equivalent that pertains to Ai? Would it be a quantified success rate of the Ai's intuition?
    1
  5. Can IQ be described as the following (?): 1) IQ is a quantified unit of measurement that pertains to the biological CPU/brain's capacity to process [quantum] information into intelligible concepts (mentally simulated/formulated to facilitate comprehension of a quantum experience). 2) IQ is quantified success rate of a biological CPU/brain's capacity to detect, and process information into an intelligible concept. NOTE: You can't understand maths if you can't detect or make sense of light, or sound. You can have a high IQ, but if you lose the ability to make sense of [quantum] stimuli; carrying information that relates to a quantum experience, like light to see and make sense of maths... You will become "dumb" in the absolute sense of the word (no pun intended). To reiterate, you can have all the computation "genius" of a supercomputer, but if you can't detect, —let alone make sense of stimuli (e.g. light or sound) in the first place (from your receptors)... Then you literally become "dumb", as your 'mind' goes sort of numb, due to lack of data to process in the first place.
    1