Comments by "bruno bond" (@mrunning10) on "Sabine Hossenfelder" channel.

  1. Only among the IDIOTS. Look in your ficken mirror for one.
    5
  2. Exonnomics and supply will NOT "sort itself out" you ignoramus as long as fossil fuel MONEY stops it from happening.
    5
  3. Science is saying it's right. Measurement and Data says it's correct. Layman with degrees in Hair Styling say otherwise and vote for more fossil fuel. All Clear?
    5
  4. YOU are clinically INSANE. Did you know that?
    4
  5. Nope, it doesn't that is corrected for by a mathematical statistical process called "normalizing" Ever fucking HEAR of it?
    4
  6. Wrong Wrong and Wrong. "California can limit gas lawn mowers but not private jets for example." California CAN limit private jets and has chosen NOT to do so. WHY? WHY? and WHY?
    4
  7. So, the 2,400 GIGATONS of c02 MAN has released in only 250 years has had NO effect? That's what you're saying?
    4
  8. They haven't been "misinformed." The conspiracy deniers either don't care, are simply too stupid, are simply too stupid to care, or are simply not conscious. (most US MAGA) There is NO "convincing" them.
    4
  9. Your comment is so stupid you must be an AI Bot. Who the fuck ever said we're getting rid of all of the co2?
    4
  10. The error margin is NOT "greater than the change." YOU lie.
    4
  11. The fossil fuel lobbiests, PACS, SPACS, Koch Brothers own THAT territory. Pointless.
    4
  12. Hummm...lets see here, climate change "business" 1.4 Billion last year. Fossil Fuels? 4.2 Trillion. I know you can't do math having flunked everything in school besides scratching your useless balls, but that's THREE TENTHS OF A PERCENT for renewables. YOU are a delusional LIAR. 3/10% you ignoramus liar
    4
  13. 280ppm. Now what?
    4
  14. You ask a question, a very good reasonable question, then you use your degree in Hair Styling to answer. Not very legitimate wouldn't you say? (of course you wouldn't say because that would take conscious rational thought right? Not you. Why don't you get off your lazy conspiracy areshole and google, from the fossil fuel industry's own production records that they must file from the SEC, HOW MUCH CO2 they have pumped out of the ground? 2,400 fucking gigatons, and you say "not us." I know you got your degree from Trump University, so this may take some time, but how much ENERGY does that 2,400 fucking GIGATONS absorb? Did your degree in Hair Styling go into that?
    4
  15. Wow! Ultimate Crazy! MAGA-ON you fucking crazy dude!
    4
  16. MAGA-ON Dude!!!
    4
  17. And of course you get your "hoax research" from you vast scientific insight in fucking lawn mower repair no doubt.
    4
  18. OK, explain why, with some MEASUREMET DATA PHYSICS and MATH...all the things you flunked in school with your lawn mower repair degree you ignoramus.
    3
  19. Because the fossil fuel industry spends BILLIONS each and every year making sure THEIR elected politicians do nothing. All Clear?
    3
  20. Look in your mirror for even more bullshit. Staring back at you all your life.
    3
  21. Just "do" something? The solutions have been here for over half a fucking century. And still no progress. Why? Because YOU vote for it. Wake the fuck UP.
    3
  22. Spot On. But you're missing the point, the U.S. elects a guy with an I.Q. of 70 and here we are talking about him "cutting science." Trump isn't "cutting science" he's cutting political opposition, "science" is just in the way.
    3
  23. Spot On. We collectively have done SHIT to start fixing this.
    3
  24. The co2 that keeps alive 8+ BILLION people on this planet is already released into our atmosphere. It is having an effect, warming. Reducing population does not change this. Besides, how you going to go about "reducing population?" Hitler? Stalin? Pol Pot? The ONLY way is a TRANSITION to non-co2-emitting power while feeding the 8 Billion who occupy this planet.
    3
  25. Did he breed his ignorance?
    3
  26. The "fraction" of human c02 emissions RATIO compared to "natural" does not fucking MATTER. It is the TOTAL amount of human c02 emissions that matter. Have YOU calculated the ENERGY ABSORBED by the EXTRA c02 emissions from humans (YOU)? Do it if you can. Can you add? Did you graduate the 5th grade? Every signle bit of huan c02 emissions have literally absorbed the Sun's ENERGY along certain IR frequencies and WARM the planet. Where the fuck you think that EXTRA ENERGY goes? Up your ass? The AMOUNT of c02 absorbing the Sun's ENERGY matters. The AMOUNT of human released c02 is NOT "natural." The 2,400 GIGATONS of c02 man has released is STILL in our atmosphere and STILL absorbing ENERGY from our Sun and will CONTINUE to do so AS LONG AS IT REMAINS IN THE ATMOSPHERE. It must be REMOVED or the planet will continue to WARM. Everything else is blah blah blah even from YOU and Dr. Hossenfelder who obviously is smart and cares but avoids the fundamental issue that must be FIXEAD. Remove the c02.
    3
  27. It doesn't. Where the fuck you get your DATA? Fox News no doubt.
    3
  28. MORON. Human beath from 8 BILLION humans is a tiny inconsequential amount compared to our industrial processes that keep humans alive on this planet. MORON. Back to school please and then make stupid comments.
    3
  29. Because humans pump 40 gigatons of co2 into the atmosphere every year that would have stayed UNDER the ground. I believe it's in the actually DNA of a climate change denier to be unable to even acknowledge this simple FACT.  @andrewdutton-nx3dh 
    3
  30. How can it "controlled" now that your Trump is in Office?
    3
  31. Your degree in Lawn Mower Repair tell you all this?
    3
  32.  @swiftlytiltingplanet8481  @samresto is just giving the same old feel good denial crap pseudo-science crap, "no evidence" of human causes increase in c02, "c12 is most of the carbon" blah blah blah, no science, no energy balance, no radio chemistry, just horseshit, heck he might even be a 4th gen AI bot.
    3
  33. Heller is just plain full of shit.
    3
  34. Horseshit. The planet is warming un-naturally very rapidly, humans are the cause, if we don't reverse it, most of us will starve.
    3
  35. Sorry Dr. Hossenfelder, "ill-informed" "delusional" or "lying" doesn't hit the nail on the head. The "people" making the "plans" are either elected by funding from fossil fuels (lobby, PACS, SPACs, or just plain graft), or are appointed by "people" elected by funding from fossil fuels. The number 1 reason this ficken mess continues is the MONEY flowing by the TRILLIONS into fossil fuels bank accounts that fund the elections of politicians that continue and maintain the legislation and policies that MAINTAIN the flow of those TRILLIONS. THAT is the way this fossil fuel world works currently. And on a practical engineering level, if we start tomorrow with the necessary trillions of dollars it will take well over 2 generations to get to net zero. (There is only ONE source of the funds necessary to solve this mess)
    3
  36. Politicians are the cause of BOTH. And it's the ONLY place to start for fixing this fucking fossil fuel mess.
    3
  37. We do know, now what? And the same CAUSE then as NOW c02
    3
  38. How the fuck does going "green" "transfer more wealth to rich?" Like do you even fucking HEAR yourself anymore? WHO are the RICH ELITE? What industry has generated more PROFITS and REVENUES in the history of man? Fossil Fuels. TRILLIONS. More power to politicians? Like the power of the politicians in place NOW election funded into office by FOSSIL FUELS. YOU are DERANGED. (or a liar, possibly both)
    3
  39. The collapse of the AMOC is a WEATHER event CAUSED by manmade global climate change WARMING.
    3
  40. Bullshit. The "modern temperature record" is the fucking WEATHER. This is what matters: https://climatefeedback.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/download3.jpg With all of YOUR vast scientific insight and wisdom, just tell us all what's going to happen with the little BLUE line? (put your conspiracy glasses on why don't you?) What's going to happen NOW, this TIME around NOW? When temperature and C02 tracking almost one-to-one for the past MILLION years? What's going to happen this time? Not for you, not for you kids or their kids (are they equally as stupid as you?) but soon enough. YOU are the "Charlatan disguised as a scientist" with YOUR bullshit no-science crap comment on the fucking internet. YOU are the CAUSE and the REASON we're in trouble. YOU
    3
  41. You constantly confuse WEATHER with CLIMATE. Stop. Wake Up. Try LEARNING something. The relation is VERY simple even for a simpleton. (are you one?) https://i0.wp.com/timesofsandiego.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Keeling-Curve.png?ssl=1 CONSTANTLY INCREASING C02. https://th.bing.com/th/id/R.37fdf42e75b54147472e955d6253b111?rik=qyzg3V5yiNOzVA&riu=http%3a%2f%2fberkeleyearth.org%2fwp-content%2fuploads%2f2020%2f08%2fglobal-mean-temperature-1850-2019-1.jpg&ehk=Ba70NQKzsZKabyaV%2bimvu0h3BRAN3OvFtnFUOCgJg4o%3d&risl=&pid=ImgRaw&r=0 MORE c02 = HIGHER temperatures. DATA from MEASUREMENT. No "agenda" No "control your life" No "IPCC collusion" No "scam" No shit sherlock. Increase the c02 and warm the fucking planet.
    3
  42. The "greenhouse effect" is NOT manmade global climate change.
    3
  43. HORSESHIT. This is about the fucking c02 numbnuts, NOT your political CRAP. SCHEIß. Hier geht es um die verdammten c02-Dummköpfe, NICHT um euren politischen Mist.
    3
  44. Of course there's a fucking "baseline." Wake the fuck up and watch this vid again and this time fucking LISTEN. Email Dr. Hossenfelder for the meaning of the BIG words that you obviously have not fucking clue because you most likely flunked out of grade school.
    3
  45.  @emese-tundetorok1135  Sure, and it doesn't MATTER. A "mini ice age" is the fucking WEATHER.
    3
  46. How the fuck would YOU know? You and your degree in lawn mower repair?
    3
  47. Spot On. OK, WHY do legislators "go so far as to disallow questioning of the science?" WHY? Say it.
    3
  48. So what?
    3
  49. Switched subjects have we Dr. Hossenfelder? Manmade climate change no longer get you the clicks??
    3
  50.  @Thomas-gk42  Dr. Hossenfelder certainly does bore with her manmade climate change denial. How 'bout you?
    3