Comments by "bruno bond" (@mrunning10) on "Climate Plans Potentially Dangerous, New Study Says" video.

  1. Sorry Dr. Hossenfelder, "ill-informed" "delusional" or "lying" doesn't hit the nail on the head. The "people" making the "plans" are either elected by funding from fossil fuels (lobby, PACS, SPACs, or just plain graft), or are appointed by "people" elected by funding from fossil fuels. The number 1 reason this ficken mess continues is the MONEY flowing by the TRILLIONS into fossil fuels bank accounts that fund the elections of politicians that continue and maintain the legislation and policies that MAINTAIN the flow of those TRILLIONS. THAT is the way this fossil fuel world works currently. And on a practical engineering level, if we start tomorrow with the necessary trillions of dollars it will take well over 2 generations to get to net zero. (There is only ONE source of the funds necessary to solve this mess)
    3
  2. So what?
    3
  3. Paid for politicians gets mine. Well not really, I vote the opposite, but you get what I mean.
    3
  4. Congratulations! The #1 STUPIDIST "science" comment on YouTube! Winner of the Idiot of the Year Award 2024! So absolutely infinitely stupid will always win out! Thanks!
    2
  5. globalist plans! conspiracy now and conspiracy forever!! MAGA-ON dude!!!
    2
  6. "One more time!"
    2
  7. Yes they do, by the dozens. WHO is IN those jets? Climate "activists?" NOPE.  @mgcarmkm4520 
    2
  8. Exactly. THE cause of humanity's continued contribution to global warming.
    2
  9. Hasn't started yet. There is still time. Get off your lazy don't-give-a-damn arse and help fix this.
    2
  10. Why are they now crazy to you? Did your Earth Day include co2?
    2
  11. What the frack you talking about?
    1
  12. Do you have ANY clue of the outcome? Any?? What is the end event state of this planet when the warming finally tops out? Think (try it!)
    1
  13. Excellent! Learn MORE and not from the fucking vids on YouTube. You STILL missed the fucking POINT. What's wrong with a "wasteland" anyway?  @JungLeeTheDoctor 
    1
  14. My God, you refuse to THINK, it's not a joke you numbnuts, there will be NO place "so we can move elsewhere." Just answer the ficken question, what's wrong with a "wasteland?"  @JungLeeTheDoctor 
    1
  15. So what? So what? So what? Etc....
    1
  16. Oh for shit sakes, wrong wrong and wrong. WHAT feeds the plants growing our FOOD in those "large city block?" And how the Fick are YOU going to "get enough energy to use without producing co2?" HOW?????
    1
  17. wow, you a bot? or work for a gas or pipeline PAC? because your first statement right from the start is just plain ficken WRONG. Or a lie? which? "balance of O2?" "spew out?" "balancing things out?" what the FICKEN you spewing out degree in lawn mower repair tell you? where in your vast knowledge of atmospheric chemistry does the 750 GIGATONS of co2 RELEASED by humanity fit in? please tell us without violating the 1st 2nd and 3rd laws of thermodynamics please. And Carnot and Entropy while you're at it. thanks!
    1
  18. There will be no "mimic" for carbon capture. It will be a catalytic process. It will be powered, duh, by non-co2-emitting energy. All Clear Now? You must believe that Scientists and Engineers are stupid because you're too dumb to understand?
    1
  19. Oh for shit sakes, wrong. Paid-for politicians maintaining the TRILLION dollar fossil fuel revenue stream "trumps" everything. Wake UP.
    1
  20. It helps a little. Does NOTHING to mitigate the 2,400 GIGATONS of co2 already released. Wake up hippie.
    1
  21. Of course there is. WE have "altered" it already with the 2,400 gigatons of co2 WE have released into the atmosphere. WE can "alter" it again by REMOVING it. Simple, but so simpleton you can't understand it I guess?
    1
  22. How about manmade climate change?
    1
  23. It won't affect YOU very much if at all. The "emergency" is the need to START now to do the things necessary to fix this fucken mess. Get a Grip and get off your lazy do-nothin' arse and help.
    1
  24. Give it a rest why don't ya? You have NO fucking clue of what is meant by "net zero." No clue.
    1
  25. Look in your ficken mirror for "brain fog." Apparently acute and systematic.
    1
  26. get off your lazy ass and help fix this mess...
    1
  27. Who is suggesting to "stop food production?" Only the conspiracy deniers and the fossil fuel narrative.
    1
  28. WRONG. Plastic in the Oceans DO NOT "heat up the oceans." WRONG. Every country could replant trees back to the coverage before the industrial revolution and it would make negligible change. (oooohhhh think! why??? Carbon Exchange BEFORE versus CARBON Exchange AFTER the ficken Industrial Revolution) Why why why do humans with NO education or LEARNING about a particular subject feel they are in any way qualified to comment?
    1
  29. If the POWER to remove or capture co2 from the atmosphere or an industrial process is produced from ENERGY from any fossil fuel then you are hearing part of a Fossil Fuel Narrative. Utter HORSESHIT.
    1
  30. And whom is the "we" "putting" idiots in control? YOU. You can't even point to the problem.
    1
  31. No it is NOT Mr. ExxonMobil. HUMANS are, by pumping 40 gigatons of co2 into the atmosphere every year that would have stayed UNDER the ground? WE are, ALL 8+ billion of us and YOU.
    1
  32. Because it violated YouTube's community guidelines. What's so ficken difficult to understand?  @StevenAakre 
    1
  33. Hardly. Do you even read the IPCC reports? Can you read?
    1
  34. This can be FIXED. What are YOU doing to help?
    1
  35. ​ @thatone2586  You have fucking GIVEN UP. Just admit it and say it. What YOU do DOES matter. Get off your lazy don't-give-a-damn arse and help fix this.
    1
  36. No, no it isn't. And WHY are you promoting the fossil fuel narrative? "Re-afforestation" whatever the frack that is, wouldn't do anything. Think (try it!) why?
    1
  37. So basically what YOU are saying, co2 does NOT warm the planet? Period. That's what you're convinced of? Fascinating, how did you arrive at this conclusion? Luck? A "vision?" A MAGA conspiracy website? How?
    1
  38.  @0topon  So WHAT? Put your factoid in fucking CONTEXT please.
    1
  39. Because of YOU listening to and voting for conspiracy theory rather than science. I'll bet my right Hoden you can't even define "net zero" except for what you hear from Murdoch Scheiße.
    1
  40. Science is questioned always, in YOUR mind however, YOU have NEVER read the science, just listened to Murdoch, so calling someone or some "government" as "elites" just shows the world (any one around you?) how stupid and ignorant you are.
    1
  41. Get your land yet? You know, for your descendants. (you breed yet?) (we can all hope not)
    1
  42. "censored?" YOU 'heard' them, so did everyone else. "They" just know Scheibe when they hear it, but apparently not YOU.
    1
  43. Everything you speak of is TRUE! Congratulations!! And as well, the EFFECTS of everything you speak of is TOTALLY NOT RELAVENT to the problem of global warming. It does not fucking MATTER that co2 is "plant food." It does not fucking MATTER that co2 is "plant food." YOU are the LIAR by propagating this LIE. Take you degree in Lawn Mower Repair, throw it in the trash, turn OFF Fox News, and fucking LEARN for only the second time in your life. It does not fucking MATTER that co2 is "plant food."
    1
  44. My God! YOU have got to be a BOT released upon us by the Cock Brothers. Got to be. Because only a Bot can make the MOST ignoramus comment of the year! If you're a real person, there is a solution, am only attempting to help here, consult with your mental medical provider and ask that your medications be INCREASED or CHANGED. You will discover that REALTITY is wonderful after your cognitive fantasy world collapse upon you. Be Brave! You can Do This!!!
    1
  45. Please describe, if you can, what the ficken are you talking about?
    1
  46. Not enough.
    1
  47.  @mariusm5660  Keep at it, makes one feel good no doubt, too bad even if every human on this planet did the same it would make NO difference to the 2,400 GIGATONS of co2 already released into our atmosphere.
    1
  48. Constantly being formed? Wow! Excellent!!! You're Hair Stylist or you Lawn Mower Repair person tell you this? So your conspiracy denial runs so deep as to accuse all of those hundreds of scientists working on the IPCC reports as "controlled" and liars? That what you're saying? Right?
    1
  49. Sure they do, so WHAT?
    1
  50. We've never stopped fucking each other. Get a Grip. Your suggestion is NO solution.
    1
  51. Why in the world do you make up conspiracy? Who ever said anything about returning (even if we could somehow) the co2 down to 0.02% ???? You make up something, 0.02%, and then proceed down the denial hole of conspiracy, when the VERY FIRST assumption, 0.02%, is just plain ficken WRONG. Also, The Oil Will End. Stupid.
    1
  52. Great, great comment demonstrating your VAST knowledge and insight regarding our climate. Thanks.
    1
  53. Don't need to. Figure it out Mr. Simpleton, it's quite simple....
    1
  54. Uhhh, that hurt, you bot, just answer the fucking question Mr. Science. Take your degree in Lawn Mower Repair of Hair Styling and google it. There is only ONE "geoengineering" approach that will get us out of the fucking mess.  @mitsu.hadeishi 
    1
  55. Shouldn't you change "obscenely rich & the military" to the "elites" and for "the protection of those fossil fuels assets?" A more accurate statement than yours. Otherwise you are just full of HORSESHIT. You really believe that our fossil fuel PAID-FOR politicians are going to do fucking ANYTHING to transition off of fossil fuels?
    1
  56. Nope. Humans will survive. Our Civilization may not. Get a ficken GRIP please.
    1
  57.  @VulcanLogic  OK, Mr. Science, WHAT is the ultimate possible end point of all of this? Bet your right theistical you have NO fucking clue.
    1
  58. Thanks for your vast Physics and Radio-Chemistry and Physical Chemistry insight, data measurements, and wisdom and calculations and conclusion, but I'll stick with Dr. Hossenfelder rather than YOU a ficken Lawn Mower Repair graduate no doubt. IGNORAMUS.
    1
  59. Dr. Hossenfelder, you are very good, but haven't stepped back at the system level and viewed the WHOLE picture. Humanity has pumped 2,400 GIGATONS of co2 into this planets atmosphere. It must be REMOVED in order to SOLVE this fossil fuel fracking mess warming the globe. Dr. Hossenfelder, du bist sehr gut, bist aber auf Systemebene nicht zurückgetreten und hast dir das GANZE Bild angesehen. Die Menschheit hat 2.400 GIGATONNEN Co2 in die Atmosphäre dieses Planeten gepumpt. Es muss ENTFERNT werden, um dieses fossile Fracking-Schlamassel zu LÖSEN, das den Globus erwärmt.
    1
  60. Humans emit 40 gigatons of co2 pumped into the atmosphere each year, THAT has NEVER occurred "many times in the past" you incredible ignoramus.
    1
  61. The correct term numbnuts is Manmade climate change. Get a Grip.
    1
  62. You're correct! Let's compare Sabine's paycheck with that of your typical fossil fuel CEO. And the answer? Seem like you're fucking wrong. Sie haben Recht! Vergleichen wir Sabines Gehaltsscheck mit dem eines typischen CEOs für fossile Brennstoffe. Und die Antwort? Es scheint, als würdest du dich verdammt noch mal irren.
    1
  63. Totally useless, you work for an oil or gas lobby perhaps? There is, year after year LESS arable land to plant your "trees" both from manmade exploitation and from warming. Neither has stopped. Even if the entire world was "planted" back to BEFORE the industrial revolution it would make little difference as we must REMOVE the co2 humanity has ALREADY released into the atmosphere. STOP emitted co2 to reduce co2. Duh.  @mikegLXIVMM 
    1
  64. Wrong. The fossil fuel industry can "afford" to remove ALL of the co2 they have pumped into our atmosphere. Falsch. Die fossile Brennstoffindustrie kann es sich "leisten", ALLES CO2 zu entfernen, das sie in unsere Atmosphäre gepumpt hat.
    1
  65. In the fucking desert...
    1
  66. Another paid by the Cock Brothers climate change denier. What for?
    1
  67. Name ONE, just ONE, who hasn't been PAID in some way by a Fossil Fuel lobby or PAC or SPAC or "special interest" LLC, or the fucking Koch Brothers. JUST ONE.
    1
  68. Like a Fart in a Hurricane. When you say stuff like that, piddling little fixes, it only helps the Fossil Fuel Narrative.
    1
  69. Where the intercoursing delusion did you get "minimal effect?" What the ficken you talking about?
    1
  70. How does a country physically "move" carbon emissions to another country?
    1
  71. Physics is Truth and The Truth Shall Set You Free. --S. Hossenfelder, June 2018  @MarshallMathersthe7th 
    1
  72. You must be a ficken BOT. Bots are programmed to ignore any questions and just bounce it back with tangential horseshit. If you're a REAL person than you're ignorant that's for sure. How do you "move" carbon emissions to "other" countries? What the ficken you talking about?  @MarshallMathersthe7th 
    1
  73. OK, totally agree, "it's all for show." Now what? You don't believe manmade climate change is real anyway, so why you bothering?  @hugoguerreiro1078 
    1
  74. What utter HORSESHIT. Where you hear that? Fox News Germany?
    1
  75.  @justound6829  YOU
    1
  76. HORSESHIT. Give ONE, just ONE example of ANY "plans" to do this. What utter conspiracy horseshit. You work for an oil lobby perhaps?
    1
  77. Just like the fossil fuel narrative. Keeping pumping that gas moron!
    1
  78. None. How many stupid sheep will fall off the cliff when they begin to starve? YOU have no ficken clue as to what the possible outcome can be from all of this do you?
    1
  79. Yes, yes it has been "naturally" warming. That is NOT the subject nor the issue. Turn UP your ficken hearing aide and try try to engage your ficken BRAIN.
    1
  80. Get that from your degree in Lawn Mower Repair did you? This can be FIXED. What are YOU doing to help? Holen Sie sich das von Ihrem Abschluss in Rasenmäherreparatur, oder? Dies kann behoben werden. Was zum Teufel tust DU, um zu helfen?
    1
  81. Impossible to "prove" anything to someone with the delusional intelligence of a house plant. Somebody prove me wrong. The fossil fuel industry determines how much co2 we pump into the atmosphere. Somebody prove me wrong.  @matthewkelly7327 
    1
  82. HORSESHIT. It's about YOUR stupidity.
    1
  83. All of this is great and will not help one bit in solving this fucking fossil fuel mess.
    1
  84. She just might be one of the smartest people on the planet. How 'bout yourself? With your degree in Lawn Mower Repair I'm sure you have vast insight and wisdom regarding the physics of our climate don't you?
    1
  85. Physics, Stanford, Class of '26. What's YOURS Mr. Lawn Mower Repair Man?  @will7its 
    1
  86. Of course not, Hansen, Clark, Biffa, Kalmus, Mann, Shindell are the "experts." But of course, YOU think Curry, Christy, Jordan Peterson, Lomborg, Monckton, are actually "scientists." Why do you "qualified" to deny manmade climate change as a reality?  @circularisnotthis 
    1
  87.  @circularisnotthis  She's one of the best physicists on the planet. Yes, she understands climate science. How 'bout yourself? You an "expert?" Or, do you just listen to Fox News? Christy? Curry? Lindzen? etc. etc. etc. Paid liars of fossil fuel industry pacs and spacs and lobbying.
    1
  88. Spot ON! Finally someone mentions THE climate driver, THE climate forcing that controls all of this fossil fuel caused mess. Kudos!!
    1
  89. Nope, couple hundred years before going to hell. What have you taught your kids? And, you ask "why?" but only give a general answer, which is TRUE, but name the NAMES. Say it. Whom is "making money" and is controlled by that money?
    1
  90. Oh yes, quit nicely, back to your hole of conspiracy theory please.
    1
  91. Question: what the frack you talking about? You work for a gas lobby perhaps?
    1
  92. Replacing the one you have in the rural mountains of northwest Georgia?
    1
  93. they they they, who the frack are "they?" what ficken "infrastructure" to build and maintain are you talking about? MORE fossil fuels "infrastructure?" HORSESHIT. Atomic is the ONLY solution out of this mess. The competent engineers ARE here. They mostly work for fossil fuels. Duh. Fossil fuels supply 90% of the power, as we TRANSITION to nukes, those fossil fuel jobs will disappear, and MOVE to atomics. This will be a multi-generation TRANSITION. What is so ficken difficult to understand?
    1
  94. "Proven?" What the ficken you talking about? You have never in your ignorant life have looked at The Keeling Curve have you? You work for an oil or gas lobby perhaps? Their narrative also is to LIE.
    1
  95. Shoulda started THAT about, oh gee whiz, about the same time we started burning coal. https://populationconnection.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/0-2100.png Coincidence? NOT. Dude, 8+ Billion People on this planet are kept alive because of fossil fuel, if we all stopped fucking tomorrow (which we won't) it wouldn't make the slightest difference.
    1
  96. Just learn this? Learn something else, so the ficken what?
    1
  97. Spoken by someone who not only didn't read the IPCC report but most likely CAN'T read anymore. MAGA-ON Dude!
    1
  98. You're a bot I'm guessing, you just bounce back with a tangential off-the-subject reply. THIS is about the co2 numbnuts. And THIS problem will not be solved by ANY "environmental laws." What horseshit, completely ignoring WHERE IS THE MONEY THAT WILL FIX THIS? This is about the ficken co2 Mr. Bot. Have YOU read the latest IPCC Report? Just answer the ficken question, or is that too much for your over-loaded conspiracy circuits to process?  @lalaboards 
    1
  99. So you're calling all of the climate scientists who research and write the IPCC reports as LIARS? Don't be scared just say it. "fake to the core people"
    1
  100. Have you ever thought (try it!) of how to "turn it off" at the "tap?" on a practical political basis? Go Google , AND WHY THEY TURNED IT OFF. The ECONOMICS "at the tap" have to change in order for the fossil fuel accountants to tell their Boards and Shareholders that capture "at the tap" is the best for their bottom lines. Wake UP.
    1
  101. So what? Too much Carbon Dioxide is harmful to the biosphere. NOT BENEFICIAL It's blatantly obvious you can't tell the difference.
    1
  102. ​ @anthonymorris5084  Harmful? Anything above 280ppm. Duh. Anything above where it would be without humanity's interference. And what where the CONDITIONS at that time you say "all the way to the Arctic circle?" You can't eat a fucking "jungle." And you wouldn't want to fucking LIVE there. Duh. What level is harmful? Are you a bot to ask such a bone headed question? Ever hear of the Keeling Curve? CO2 should be 280 ppm NOW. It is not. We do not no conclusively know how much each increase in co2 will result in what amount of warming, only that the planet will and IS warming NOW. What will the conditions be when it finally stops? NOT a fucking JUNGLE, a fucking DESSERT. Duh. The OTHER atmospheric conditions at the time you mention WERE FUCKING DIFFERENT. The loss of arable land where we humanity YOU can GROW the food we need to survive continues has shrunk for the past 250 years and continues to reduce NOW. Where will it STOP? YOU do NOT know. Climate Scientists do NOT know. Take the risk and do nothing, WE may DIE. Reject the fossil fuel risk and WE LIVE. Duh.
    1
  103. You don't "study" nothing but conspiracy horseshit conspiracy. Please tell the world the EFFECT of humanity pumping into the atmosphere 750 GIGATONS of co2 that would have STAYED under the ground if not for us. well? please explain. remember, this is a TEST. show your math and explain the physics. (difficult to do with your degree in Hair Styling?) \
    1
  104. Conspiracy NOW! Conspiracy FOREVER!! MAGA-ON Dude!!!
    1
  105. Yep, why do you think it's not?
    1
  106. Breath MORE deeply please.
    1
  107. The climate has always changed. So WHAT? Not talking about the normal up and down cycle of the climate. We're talking about THIS: https://assets.weforum.org/editor/36m3FnquTTKXIWrk5MCaLzKYk1A7bS8Q3aTrFUu7kxw.png After nearly a million years of natural up and down, humanity, YOU, have CHANGED the cycle by releasing, in very little time, 750 GIGATONS of co2. What will happen? Nothing? Tell the world why "nothing" will happen? Why will that little BLUE line stay down? Tell us. Remember this is a TEST. Show your work, remember your MATH and PHYSICS don't you?
    1
  108. MAGA-ON dude!  @jamesgreig5168 
    1
  109. And YOU voted for The Orange Freak. All equals out in the end.  @jamesgreig5168 
    1
  110. Your "TREE" can't touch the 2,400 GIGATONS of co2 already RELEASED by humanity.
    1
  111. Please list these "thousands of others renowned senior scientists." Can you do that please? Oh, please don't include ANY who have received a paycheck from fossil fuels, that would sorta dis-qualify them don't you think? (try it!)
    1
  112. Go away fucking bot.
    1