Comments by "bruno bond" (@mrunning10) on "EXPLORE WITH US" channel.

  1. WTFAYTA?
    2
  2. So much incorrect in this, so much out of context. Mixing of timelines, mixing of what was said to whom where and when. Added up, this vid is HORSESHIT. ONE example out of dozens: the pages were not "mysteriously torn out." Scholars know who did it and why, and by the way they were cut, razored-out, not "torn" HORSESHIT video.
    2
  3. So much incorrect in this, so much out of context. Mixing of timelines, mixing of what was said to whom where and when. Added up, this vid is HORSESHIT. ONE example out of dozens: the pages were not "mysteriously torn out." Scholars know who did it and why, and by the way they were cut, razored-out, not "torn" HORSESHIT video.
    2
  4. So much incorrect in this, so much out of context. Mixing of timelines, mixing of what was said to whom where and when. Added up, this vid is HORSESHIT. ONE example out of dozens: the pages were not "mysteriously torn out." Scholars know who did it and why, and by the way they were cut, razored-out, not "torn" HORSESHIT video.
    2
  5. YOU believe?? How about all of the historical scholars studying the man? NO, not "about" Alice. But written because of Alice and for Alice.
    2
  6. And if he had flying rainbow unicorns pooping out his arse that would also explain his favor of the other kids as it would entertain them right?
    2
  7.  @xFlowerChild420x  Sure thing, anyone can speculate anything against the dead, they can't sue in a court of law.
    2
  8. What the fuck are YOU talking about? Dodgson never hurt, abused, molested, groomed anyone ever his entire life. THAT is what we KNOW.
    2
  9. YASFOS. Amazing mind trip here. Feel good to PUKE, does it? My God, there is more fiction in your post then Alice's Adventures in Wonderland. EVERY sentence is delusional, Amazing, couldn't do that even if I tried! Try the TMAP program and up the dosage of Clozapine right away!
    2
  10. the devils! not like we do that now!
    1
  11. HORSESHIT theory. No parallels at all to MJ. Intercourse MJ.
    1
  12. HORSESHIT.
    1
  13. EXACTLY. So much incorrect in this, so much out of context. Mixing of timelines, mixing of what was said to whom where and when. Added up, this vid is HORSESHIT. ONE example out of dozens: the pages were not "mysteriously torn out." Scholars know who did it and why, and by the way they were cut, razored-out, not "torn" HORSESHIT video.
    1
  14. There are no parallels at all between Dodgson and MJ. Intercourse MJ.
    1
  15. Yet another another HORSESHIT theory.
    1
  16. Wow, where the fuck did you dream up THAT fantasy horsecrap?
    1
  17. WTFAYTA??
    1
  18. OMG, what HORSESHIT thinking, can't even attaching "thinking" to this theory. What utter CRAP.
    1
  19. I'm sure you have a few bats in the belfry too. Like viewing this vid and thinking its "true" without doing some research on your own, read up, get educated before commenting Horseshit. Dodgson never harmed or abused or molested or groomed or endangered anyone his entire life.
    1
  20.  @whatanitemare  Nailed It. Except, "...a lot more about you than the Rev. Charles Dodgson"
    1
  21. Who cares? What does THIS have to do with Dodgson?? Not into the fantasy genre too much make believe, try AAIW instead.
    1
  22. What do you think of the books?
    1
  23. That's because this vid has so much incorrect, so much out of context. Mixing of timelines, mixing of what was said to whom where and when. Added up, this vid is HORSESHIT. ONE example out of dozens: the pages were not "mysteriously torn out." Scholars know who did it and why, and by the way they were cut, razored-out, not "torn" HORSESHIT video.
    1
  24. No he did NOT. Wake up from your internet dream reality. That picture was NOT Lorina Charlotte Liddell but some "medical condition" photograph that might have been in his collection (over 1/2 of his 3,000 photographs in his collection were BOUGHT) (and the ink on the back of that photograph by the way is MODERN, not from the 1880s) Wake UP stop propagating HORSESHIT because it reinforces imagined neurosis in YOUR head.
    1
  25. Because it didn't happen. Simple eh? Dodgson was in love with Alice, the falling out was not big deal, just Victorian Era put one in one's proper place. What these internet scandal vids don't do is proper research. Dodgson even in the early days with the three sisters was NEVER alone with the girls. He stayed within "friendly" terms with the family and with Alice for the remainder of his life.
    1
  26. WTF? Ramble a stream-of-consciousness somewhere else in the mirror perhaps?
    1
  27. Exactly! Although HORSESHIT works too.
    1
  28. That's because Dodgson WAS a child, he never lost it in growing up and we in modern times socially correct drugged out world just don't know how to deal with this. So all we say is "he was sick."
    1
  29. HORSESHIT.
    1
  30. What tone? Stupid and mindless?
    1
  31. HORSESHIT.
    1
  32.  @i10i60  Nope. Historical scholars studying the man all their lives. NOT this HORSESHIT vid.
    1
  33. And HOW, just ONCE, were ANY of Dodgson's "child friends" taken advantage of? Point to something please NOT just internet scandal innuendo crap for clicks. Not once, no evidence that Dodgson ever, his entire life, or the entire life of the children even into adulthood, that he ever abused, molested, groomed, hurt anyone ever.
    1
  34. Yah, ain't imagination just wonderful? This vid and that theory is CRAP. So much incorrect in this vid, so much out of context. Mixing of timelines, mixing of what was said to whom where and when. Added up, this vid is HORSESHIT. ONE example out of dozens: the pages were not "mysteriously torn out." Scholars know who did it and why, and by the way they were cut, razored-out, not "torn" HORSESHIT video.
    1
  35. Criminal Law Amendment Act (CLAA) 1885, the Act that raised the age of consent from thirteen to sixteen. They were not "alarmed." Simply did not think that a working man, an employee, should marry a daughter, simple as that.
    1
  36. WTFAYTA? "held at Columbia" did you even listen or do ANY research as to WHY she (and her surviving son as well) were INVITED to New York?? Any CLUE? What HORSESHIT thinking.
    1
  37. So what? What do YOU think in reading the works??
    1
  38. YASFOS. Replay, get the timeline right this time around. He wasn't allowed to "see the kids" 2 years before the book was presented. And by the way, any man who hand-inks a book like that is a man in love. Duh. This vid is HORSESHIT.
    1
  39. How about the book?
    1
  40. EXACTLY! but ain't internet scandal and innuendo just marvelous?
    1
  41. Your taste, a shame, try reading it again, rediscover childhood lost. Let go, find the inner child if there ever was one.
    1
  42.  @quinnhen2325  cluck cluck cluck
    1
  43. YASFOS. Horseshit theory. Do YOUR homework.
    1
  44. So what? Grace Slick and her stupid song can go intercourse themselves. NOTHING to do with Dodgson, Alice, or the stories.
    1
  45. EXACTLY! Another HORSESHIT theory This vid is CRAP.
    1
  46. Another HORSESHIT theory.
    1
  47. OK; like what?
    1
  48.  @i10i60  And what we can't reconcile is the grooming of the parents, ALL of the parents of EVERY child he photographed. Not sneaky, not clandestine, open.
    1
  49.  @i10i60  Sure we can; what happened? Nothing. Throughout his life and the lives of the children and all the families. NOTHING. Don't you see the internet scandal Rabbit Hole of the thinking exhibited by this vid and many others?
    1
  50. FCS. "Liddell" not Little. And who are "they?" and please provide the reference to this "rumor." First ANYONE has ever heard of it. HORSESHIT.
    1
  51.  @xFlowerChild420x  Cohen, Wakeling, Gardner found nothing.
    1
  52. And you consulted your read-the-thoughts-of-dead-people-time-machine to find this out right?
    1
  53.  @veeveedenka3538  What HORSESHIT
    1
  54. It isn't.
    1
  55. BBC should have covered it up, the verbal description was sufficient, thoughts and respect for the poor girl, long dead, should have been observed. But ask oneself, why show it? The producers knew exactly what they were doing, and the audience reaction they would get. Leading the viewer to a GUILTY reaction. That last photograph is not Lorina Charlotte Liddell. It is a medical condition photograph that was in Dodgson's collection.
    1
  56. But Dodgson wasn't on Acid, so how do you explain it?
    1
  57. How bout Victoria England? Up the dosage!
    1
  58. Said by whom? What nonsense.
    1
  59. READ the books, very much different engages different areas of imagination and thinking, active not passive. It makes a difference. No movies back then.
    1
  60. OMG, replay, listen this time. The rift was 2 years BEFORE the book and 3 years BEFORE the publication.
    1
  61. So much incorrect in this, so much out of context. Mixing of timelines, mixing of what was said to whom where and when. Added up, this vid is HORSESHIT. ONE example out of dozens: the pages were not "mysteriously torn out." Scholars know who did it and why, and by the way they were cut, razored-out, not "torn" HORSESHIT video.
    1
  62. If Dodgson had "dyslexia" then we need more people with "dyslexia"
    1
  63. HORSESHIT. "they" they they... YOU fall on a spectrum? (nude of girls, four survive, go READ, find out how when where why they were taken) Grab a dictionary, the one titled "dictionary of psychological disorders" yep that's the one! "Pedophile = behavior. Unless you read his thoughts? time machine/? Dodgson never abused or molested or hurt anyone ever and no evidence of having ever attempted such a thing.
    1
  64. Why should your LSD trip be like Alice's?
    1
  65. And you are WRONG.
    1
  66. why highschool?
    1
  67. You have no clue what you're talking about WRT Charles Dodgson.
    1
  68. There was NO affair. Dodgson was never alone with the children. The Jefferson Airplane song has to connection to Dodgson and Alice in Wonderland other than the drugged-out hippie song lyrics. Dodgson was in Love with Alice Liddell. Any of Dodgson's "problems" or "migraines" or "opium" (if he ever did) had NOTHING to do with the books. It is simply called "imagination."
    1
  69. Ah yes and we are sooooo morally correct.
    1
  70.  @rachellrobinson9779  There are no parallels between MJ and Dodgson. MJ was a groomer and molester. Intercourse MJ.
    1
  71. Dodgson remained unmarried because he did not wish to complete his vows which would mean a vow of celibacy. He was not celibate, many an adult female friend.
    1
  72.  @rachellrobinson9779  HORSESHIT. No parallels between MJ and Dodgson. Intercourse MJ.
    1
  73. Who were DODGSON's friends? "Back then?" Yah right, not like NOW. Back then they met online and at internet cafes most likely. YHNFCWYTA.
    1
  74.  @brandiclark7117  Who were Dodgson's friends FCS, back to school, try starting with grammar, then move on to Lewis Carol. The guys NAME was Rev. Charles Dodgson. "Back 'then' pedophiles hung together." What CRAP NONSENSE and HORSESHIT (CNH) in that order. I'll say it again, quite calm too! YHNFCWYTA!
    1
  75. Why don't YOU do some math and explain it??
    1
  76.  @mesapdarecriminals0integri563  except the "riff" occurred years BEFORE Dodgson published AAIW. well, there goes THAT "money" theory down the 'ole loo blah blah blah from the fucking internet of scandal and clickbaiting. Charles Dodgson was in love with Alice Liddell. All of the history of the two is explained by this.
    1
  77. Holy JHC. You can't be serious??
    1
  78.  @STREETNINJA26  Of course it's speculation and of course it's completely wrong. Timeline and "royalties?" WTF?? Dodgson was very rich because of his work, did not need anybody's money.
    1
  79. Who TF cares? We need more on the autism spectrum, give 'em a typewriter and write! All God's Children, not our prejudices of what's "right" and "normal" in order to keep a drug industry going in THESE 'modern' times.
    1
  80.  @cherrylee1103  Art is Pain. What an "artist" thinks is his/her business not mine. Dodgson never harmed or molested or groomed or abused or threatened anyone ever his entire life. What he goes home and masturbates to is his business and NOT YOURS.
    1
  81. EXACTLY! Victoria era scandal THEN makes no sense to us NOW.
    1
  82. Did SHE, Alice, not HE. Do some research next time, and listen, but not to this CRAP vid.
    1
  83. so YOU read them?
    1
  84. Please, elucidate more....
    1
  85. "Woke" has NOTHING to do with this. Stop projection modern horseshit psycho-babble onto Dodgson and Alice
    1
  86. WTF are "they?" Donald Trump's legal team?
    1
  87. Another HORSESHIT theory
    1
  88. Oh? And did you hear it from the author himself? Or just one of his acquaintances? Or perhaps it was Dodgson or Alice overheard at the Cambridge coffee house where the Queen and daughter Alice frequented? YASFOS.
    1
  89. He's dead by the way.
    1
  90. So much incorrect in this, so much out of context. Mixing of timelines, mixing of what was said to whom where and when. Added up, this vid is HORSESHIT. ONE example out of dozens: the pages were not "mysteriously torn out." Scholars know who did it and why, and by the way they were cut, razored-out, not "torn" HORSESHIT video.
    1
  91. YASFOS. WTFAYTA?
    1
  92. So What? That's not Alice or AAIW for sure.
    1
  93. It's called the "age of consent." 1275AD by law was 12 years old. How's that grab you. Criminal Law Amendment Act (CLAA) 1885, the Act that raised the age of consent from thirteen to sixteen Alice turned 13 on April 1852 + 13 = 1865. 2 years after Mum tossed him out, 6 months before he presented "Alice's Adventures Underground" to Alice.
    1
  94. yes the narrator knows this.
    1
  95. Another HORSESHIT theory
    1
  96. Try reading the book. Any CHILD being shown and read to or in reading AAIW whom feels dark or disturbed needs phycological counseling help and especially the parents who gave the child their own neurosis.
    1
  97. And so now Reverend Charles L. Dodgson is a serial killer? WE do NOT "know" what was in his HEAD. JHC. Unless you have that Read-the-minds-of-dead-people-time-machine? Please share it I want to see too!
    1
  98. Horseshit.
    1
  99. This vid is innuendo scandal horseshit.
    1
  100. Nothing to do at all with GAA. WTF? Where did you come up with that?
    1
  101.  @trendkill1891  The BOOK under discussion is Alice's Adventures in Wonderland. Intercourse JA, GS, and that drugged-out psychopath character in that wildly popular and stupid book.
    1
  102. There is no "horror" in AAIW.
    1
  103. WTFAYTA?
    1
  104. The book has NOTHING to do with Dodgson's pedophilia. And, that's right! Screw the lack of evidence, let's go with "alternate truth."
    1
  105. WTFC?
    1
  106. Nope, extinct before Dodgson's time.
    1
  107. EXACTLY! So much incorrect in this, so much out of context. Mixing of timelines, mixing of what was said to whom where and when. Added up, this vid is HORSESHIT. ONE example out of dozens: the pages were not "mysteriously torn out." Scholars know who did it and why, and by the way they were cut, razored-out, not "torn" HORSESHIT video.
    1
  108. Charles Dodgson never hurt abused molested or groomed anyone ever his entire life. So much incorrect in this vid, so much out of context. Mixing of timelines, mixing of what was said to whom where and when. Added up, this vid is HORSESHIT. ONE example out of dozens: the pages were not "mysteriously torn out." Scholars know who did it and why, and by the way they were cut, razored-out, not "torn" HORSESHIT video.
    1
  109. And HOW do you KNOW this? Used your Read-the-Thoughts-of-Dead-People-Time-Machine and stole a peek inside Dodgson's head?
    1
  110. Another HORSESHIT theory
    1
  111. So, we can dismiss your comment due to "mental health issues?" We do NOT know what caused the rift. Thus, all the HORSESHIT innuendo and speculation.
    1
  112. Dodgson was NOT "lonely." FWTF did that come? Stop speculating without evidence. Dodgson did NOT "romantically desire children" FWTF did that come? Stop speculating without evidence. But we do jump to scandalous conclusions because Dodgson was "an odd duck." A man who hand-inks over a period of 2 years that book AAUG (not AAIW) and then gathers up the courage to ask the Mother to present the book to Alice is a man in love. Not evil, not lonely, not pedophilia, LOVE.
    1
  113. NOPE. Nothing similar at all.
    1
  114. And WE are the ones to criticize and place scandal on Dodgson!
    1
  115. Dodgson was in love with Alice.
    1
  116. YASFOS. HORSESHIT CRAP WTFAYTA? Try READING the book.
    1
  117. Because it sells!
    1
  118. Your taste. Childhood never found.
    1
  119. The full-frontal nude is NOT Lorina Charlotte Liddell. The documentary "on it" is scandal innuendo HORSESHIT. OMG, get a CLUE, the "kissing" photograph is faked photoshopped. Get your head out of your sphincter before posting MANURE.
    1
  120. HORSESHIT. Dodgson MIGHT have used opium, and there is NO evidence that it had ANYTHING to do with writing AAIW. NOTHING. Horseshit conspiracy theory.
    1
  121. OMG. Replay and listen this time. The rift came 2 years BEFORE the book. And there is NO EVIDENCE that the mother even knew Dodgson told the story to the sisters and then was pestered by Alice to write it down.
    1
  122. You won't find out from this CRAP vid. Neither. Why not find out? Her speeches at the acceptance are online too.
    1
  123. So much incorrect in this vid, so much out of context. Mixing of timelines, mixing of what was said to whom where and when. Added up, this vid is HORSESHIT. ONE example out of dozens: the pages were not "mysteriously torn out." Scholars know who did it and why, and by the way they were cut, razored-out, not "torn" HORSESHIT video.
    1