Comments by "irresistablejewel" (@irresistablejewel) on "Hillary Clinton Emails Reveal Real Reason U.S. Destroyed Libya!" video.

@GazGuitarz Building 7 was not a Gold repository; it was largely offices (and the CIA occupied some of them). Fort Knox is a Gold repository, but even Senators lack the authority to look inside (it's a secret); while there's more than 1000 times the "paper Gold" than actual physical Gold in the World. The leaders of Iraq and Libya both proposed trading oil in a Gold backed currency; just before America attacked these countries; the Gold reserves (and foreign financial holdings) of Libya and Iraq just disappeared... So: America usually goes to war for economic reasons (eliminate competition); the petrodollar as reserve currency was a huge advantage; but a Gold backed currency would end money printing... building 7 was not a Gold repository (it collapsed after being on fire for most of a day); while 1 & 2 were used as a weapon (so a legitimate target).
5
Looks like China is "the globalists" next "enemy"; the era of the petrodollar is ending; while printing more money to export to "bananastan" might not get people elected. Since globalism often seems to make the rich richer and the poor dead; while we get the bill; no reason to fight for something, so one day we have the freedom to live on the street. Yes, if you can't find: Ukraine; Libya or Iraq on the map, you have been diverted (from more pressing issues); it's clear our leaders only represent a select few (not us).
1
@mylocus1013 According to those atheists in the Engineering Department at Edinburgh University; after ten floors of the Building 7 had been on fire for over seven hours: the structure lost lateral bracing, due to the failure of a component (somewhere between floors 12-14) and this was due to fire altering the mechanical properties of steel and thermal expansion. In their report: after column 79 on floor 13 buckled and failed; the structure experience progressive collapse; as loads were transferred. Obviously the building did collapse; but that was happening before it fell, due to the force of gravity taking over. The designers of tall buildings don't want them to fall sideways; while the pull of gravity is towards the center of the earth; so structures fall down where they stood. The Twin Towers (buildings 1 & 2) did not experience a progressive collapse; the central load bearing column fractured, then sheared (and that was all that was supporting it). So there is sufficient evidence to debunk various conspiracy theories; building 7 was largely offices; while the Twin Towers had been viewed as a legitimate target before. There were at least three buildings on fire after the twin towers fell; no water supply; all destroyed. If our engineers are correct, this was an act of war.
1