Comments by "irresistablejewel" (@irresistablejewel) on "Fiona Hill: Absolute victory over Russia is not possible" video.

  1. She does seem signed up to the neo-Con "cause": on one hand UK & America agree to Ukraine independence, on the other both the EU and America keep offering Ukraine money; when the Ukrainian government say they would like to join EU & NATO, Russia "intervenes" (as the msm like to put it) in a civil war (2014-22 that already killed 13K). Trump didn't start any new American wars, but he didn't end any either. A lot of the current problems stem from the actions of the G.W. Bush administration; turns out the Obama administration wasn't as nice as his public persona; but the Biden administration (who want Germany to send tanks?!); it may not be clear to some American commentators (like Fiona Hill), but there wasn't just one "Holocaust" in WW2. If she wants direct conflict with Russia, then she is a fool; it's not that she's not explaining it properly; Russia is not going to run out of missiles and they are clearly not interested in American neo-Con: fears; words or ambition. I believe China's stance is correct: don't try and involve us (China) in American power games; naive to demand we (China) take sides; none of our business. Btw All the USSR (CCCP) nuclear weapons, they belong to Russia, so it's not correct to say Ukraine gave up "their" nuclear weapons. My guess is (and it's just a guess). if Ukraine doesn't start negotiations with Russia soon, there won't be a Ukraine; if Germany enters the conflict, we might well see WW3 start in Europe.
    1