Comments by "irresistablejewel" (@irresistablejewel) on "63 Russian soldiers killed by HIMARS missile strike, Moscow says" video.
-
1
-
1
-
@benjaminmartin7702 Oh come on...!? NATO has missile bases on the Russian border, only their word the cruise missiles there don't have nuclear warheads, but they've lied to Russia (and China) before (it was regime change in Libya they were after). There have been NATO military exercises in countries on the Russia border; in the South China Seas (annoying China) and there were American military advisors in Ukraine since 2014, plus money sent. Are you really trying to tell me you didn't see this, or hear about it?
Then there was the American "beef" with Syria (who offer Russia a refueling base for the Black Sea fleet based in Crimea); the UK parliament voted not to assist America in it's bombing raid, good thing too: Russia were deploying anti-ship and anti-missile defenses; Russia were invited into Syria, while America backed an overthrow of the Assad regime and still American troops occupy the Syrian oil-fields.
I'm not deceiving myself (any more than usual); but the Western corporate media tend to offer a rather one sided account (theirs); they lie (they lied us into two wars); they turn on their former allies: Hussein (hung); Gadaffi (lynched); Assad (had to call in Russia), these American policy makers are not the "good guys"; their wars aren't about "interventions to save civilian life" (they've killed to many for that to be believed); it's about American economic interest: oil, opium; oil; making sure that oil is traded in dollars (not Gold) and gas & oil (again); they are also profiting from weapons sales (the weapons companies even sponsored the last Ukrainian fundraiser in Washington DC (their names were on the invite).
Russia is not not going to allow the Western oligarchs to expand their interests to include Russia speaking (Eastern) Ukraine.
You should realise that 300K troops are not enough to take over Ukraine; so it's not about world domination (Btw Russia lost 860,000 troops in one battle, in WW2, which they happened to win); it'n not about democracy (the Ukrainian government: banned other political parties, jailed the main opposition leader, banned Russian and Russia speaking channels and have been shelling their own citizens for over 8 years, the media claiming the war started in 2022 (that's another lie).
The worst of it (imo) is the (mainly) American media now trying to claim they care about people. They don't; they care about money; their sponsors profits and since Russia already knows they are liars, they aren't listening the the pretty words; Russia warned the Western interests they ignored that, so now Russia is going to destroy Ukraine, also they want NATO missile bases off their borders and sending $45 Billion to another corrupt country, it's a waste of money. They msm have tried to beautify Zelinsky; his designer beard and T is a work of art... but if you don't know what the Ukrainian mafia look like... (I do); or a lost cause; or the oil and arm lobby tilting at WW3.
America has destroyed: Iraq; Libya; spent longer in Afghanistan that WW2 it's always about money; it's us the msm are trying to deceive. It's not about money for Russia; they're furious; they are an energy; food and weapons exporting super-power... sanctions indeed?? From my experience of Russia (& China) you won't believe what the are capable of doing and people are going to die. There's no deception here; Russia warned the West; it fired a traditional warning shot; that wasn't enough. If it turns out the CIA did topple the Ukrainian government; they should receive the bill, as for the $45 Billion "charity" it's money laundering. Russia isn't doing this for the money y'know; they didn't blow up their own pipelines and do not involve China in American power games (now that's a serious warning, Chinese don't usually speak like this); besides they know the score...
1
-
@Kyriosin I tend to agree: there are strong reasons for Russian involvement in Ukraine and not one of them is to do with money. I wish the Ukrainian people all the luck in the world; the government(s), that's another matter. There does seem to have been a rise of the far-right in Western politics; both main American parties; the two main UK parties (supporters of corporations; trickle-down economics and the global "New World Order") they'd follow a fiver profit or a cliff and may well have...
Since I doubt America would like Russia to form a military alliance with (say) Mexico; put a missile base in Cuba; or bad-mouthing the President of Russia (Russia-gate hoax), why would the sponsors of Western government expect Russia not to be furious?
The American military/industrial complex is "coining it in" (EU complaint); energy supplies at risk (EU complaint); another refugee crisis (EU complaint: see Libya).
American policy makers somehow amazed that not everyone is signed up to: "sanctions"; the cancel Russia campaign, all brought to you by msm weapons salesmen with their "war weather map" while the tripe the media come up with... the fake news brigade never saw a war they didn't like!?
So now they send billions to another highly corrupt country; "lethal aid"; tell us Ukraine will win... Just remember the msm don't care about people; they lied us into two wars; 50,000 kids dead in Iraq/ Afghanistan (the price we have to pay: M. Allbright... but she didn't have to pay it)... but what about the children? They don't care, it's cynical pretense; it's money laundering.
So I do agree, Russia, Putin or his successor will not back down; the Western oligarchs are investing out money in WW3 and if there's any doubt what happens with a superpower attacks, we could just ask America (Iraq; Libya; Afghanistan... all trashed). It's up to Ukraine and Russia to sort this out; it looks like it's up to them.
I hear charity begins at home... ends up in Panama... so where's our "lethal aid"?
It's not about "the money" for Russia, the msm are barking up the wrong tree, WW3 will dent profits I expect.
1