Comments by "irresistablejewel" (@irresistablejewel) on "Russia Ukraine war: Missiles hit Kyiv" video.

@danielgoring1328 The civil war started in 2014
1
@danielgoring1328 No, it was actually Western interests" that sparked the civil war; their interest is usually: oil (opium once) and selling weapons and I wouldn't describe Putin a victim (because Russia exports: oil food and weapons). Also those "interests" never cared about people before; in their invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan they killed over 50,000 kids so their crocodile tears now are just an excuse... It's likely that the main reason for sending money and weapons to what is actually a corrupt (and bankrupt) eastern European country is that if the CRIBS countries do introduce a Gold backed currency then that would spell the end of their (seemingly endless) money printing. Their problem is that unlike: Iraq; Afghanistan; Libya; Syria; Yemen; Haiti... etc Russia is a nuclear super-power and more than capable of defending itself. There was never a chance that Russia would allow "The Cossacks" to join a Western military alliance; both NATO and the EU were told that (in plain language), but they never listen (even to their own people) and the American media (after lying us into two wars) now seem intent on starting WW3. I suggest you ignore their propaganda; it's all about the money (theirs not ours) and that $40 Billion will simply disappear... Ukraine already had it's independence from the old Soviet Union; they don't have a functioning democracy and "freedom" is just a word the media use. It's odd that the EU gas supply is still running (in a war); foreign dignitaries arrive en mass in Kiev/ Kyiv/Keeve and we are told Ukraine is "winning" (as the Donbass turns red). I doubt Germany will allow America oligarchs to start WW3 in Europe, but they do seem to run American politics and the media. They've lost their "investment" in Ukraine; as usual civilians will pay for it all; Russia isn't Libya, it's capable of knocking this planet of it's axis. Countries don't win against superpowers, if there's any doubt ask America!
1
@danielgoring1328 Libya does... the foreign secretaries of America and UK (Clinton and Hague) lied to Russia and China (it was about regime change); Gadaffi (like Hussein of Iraq) proposing a Gold backed currency it seems that's bad for ones health and the claim it was an "intervention to save civilian life" is demonstrably untrue... big refugee crisis and now Libya is an Islamic state. There are definitely some similarities; a Gold backed currency will effectively end fiat money printing and that very much concerns "Western interests" (or should). The American media keep referring to Putin, even tried to claim he got Trump elected; it rather simplifies their usual smear tactics; but if Putin retired tomorrow this military action most likely would not. Ukraine is a personal matter for Russia, not just Putin, but the media need a figure to hate (see Orange man bad). Ukraine didn't just go independent; it was granted independence by the Soviet authorities (other former states were too; some, like Chechia were not; it was on the understanding it remained neutral. NATO and the EU don't want that; Russia insisted and moved to military action when that was ignored (in 2022). Until then (officially) Russia was not involved in the civil war; but that may or may not be true (as they have a vested interest). Crimea was never going to just be bought out by the EU (and now they know that). No, Ukraine was bankrupt; it owes Russia a lot of money for gas (despite the high tariffs Ukraine would charge for handling the EU gas supply. Proposals to circumvent the tariffs (Nordstream2) are opposed by both Ukraine and America; it was suspended (not because of American sanctions, although they penalised EU countries and companies); probably because Germany was put in an awkward position (being against the Russian action and for Russian energy; it's tough to do both); but never forget that Ukraine is highly corrupt and being a leader there means you have to be in on that to some degree). I don't regard Putin as bitter about Ukraine; he strikes me as quite business like and while the media like to claim the Russian public are "easily led" but, in my experience, Russia (with state funded education) has a well educated population and even the Western media propagandists have to concede Putin is extremely popular (if we believe the polls, which generally speaking I don't). Never enough power (for Putin)... are you joking? Russia is a technologically led society with vast resources and (strangely perhaps) display of wealth is regarded as crass. Putin may be a multi-millionaire (as claimed) but I doubt it (he doesn't need to be); that seems to be another attempted smear, Russians (I found) tend to be more interested in things and concept, not money per se. Actually Putin isn't a dictator; but it sounds good, nor is Xi of China (President of a single party government). They are nothing like Stalin or Mao, actually it seems more likely that America is a fascist dictatorship, because (regardless of party or President) America keeps to the same foreign policy and companies seem to have rather too much influence over government. I would imagine Putin is completely ruthless in some respects; but he has been crystal clear on the Russian speaking states of Ukraine: NATO and the EU were told to keep out (they didn't); they were given notice to get their troops and diplomats out (which they did) and Russia has fired the traditional warning shot. If NATO puts a foot into Ukraine, Russia have indicated they will use nuclear weapons (believe that, or not; I believe they are not bluffing). I'm not a fan of Putin; definitely not Zelinsky and I view both Biden and Johnson as practiced liars who will bend over for the oil/arms/ banking lobbies. That's just my view, but normal countries v a super-power lose and if Russia wanted (bankrupt) Ukraine, they could raise it to the ground. Yes, I expect Russia will seek to eliminate any Western move on Ukraine; they lost 860,000 men and 1000 tanks in a single battle (which they won) in WW2; these former military (now weapon-salesmen) "experts" with their "war weather map" don't seem or want to understand that Ukraine is now Russian business. Anyways, I'll return you to the narrative where Ukraine will defeat Russia if only you send more money, but on a cynical note...what has Ukraine done for us recently? This Ukraine crisis is the West's fault; they were warned, but they don't listen... toppling the Ukrainian government in 2014 was a v bad idea.
1
@danielgoring1328 Unfortunately it's us (in the West) that are subject to a lot of propaganda: "the globalists" wanted the leaders of Iraq and Libya dead (because they can't afford to pay for oil in Gold); hunt for Bin Laden (wrong country; stayed huntin' for years after); meanwhile an opium epidemic broke out in America (see Purdue chemicals, Oxycodone). It's all about the money these American invasions... have no doubt... and Libya was the richest country in Africa; quite progressive in many ways; 105 cruise missiles fired into Tripoli, that's barbarism; so was "Shock and Awe", but keep in mind that Hussein and Gadaffi were former allies and Russia and China were given assurances by H Clinton; we can see she lied and so can they! It seems to me that you don't understand Russia's relationship to Ukraine; it was supposed to be a barrier between West and East; while NATO was supposed to be the equivalent of the Warsaw Pact (which no longer exists) and the EU keeps expanding it's "remit". The corporate media are pro-war one day; now anti-war and the reason (put simply) is money; they don't care about people (never did); but Russia will inevitably absorb the Russian speaking part of Ukraine (Luhansk and Donetsk don't want to be part of Ukraine). Russians support Putin; while some Western leaders (no names) are on thin ice and clearly want any kind of distraction from their poor governance. I'm not for or against Putin; it's not my business, but the West was warned and it looks like the $/oil (petrodollar) has had it's day... so no (disgusting) "oil for food" programs required for Russia and the UK government claims they will ruin Russia (clearly the right people for the job, they've ruined the UK)... and got rich doing it. It's all about the money for the Western interests"; but the globalist dream is dead and it wasn't Putin doing that (they did it to themselves). Russia is nothing like N Korea; you should maybe visit sometime; it's high tech; with a NHS and state funded education, it's nothing like the media try to portray. I was a casino trouble shooter in Moscow; now casinos are banned there; that's good because gambling doesn't work in Russia. Goldman Sachs leaving Russia, best news I've heard in a while!
1
@danielgoring1328 Can't be bothered? I already told you Russia has come in on the side of Russian speaking Ukrainians (13K dead) and Zelinsky and his government were responsible for most of that. Putin didn't tell Ukraine what to do; he told Ukraine (and others) what they'd better not do (and Russia also wants NATO missile bases off it's border: see Cuban missile crisis). It's all been simplified for fans of the Democrats: Putin bad; Russia's response to Western interests crossing a line being a surprise (it isn't) and so Zelinsky is either mad or bad (or possibly both). WW2 largely occurred because of punitive war reparations from WW1; it hobbled Germany and so the NAZI's got to power by exploiting that; Russia however just wants the Donbass (back) but may take more (to negotiate down). I don't know if Russia is entitled to do that, but one things for sure; America must stop messing around on Russia's border!!
1
@danielgoring1328 By your own admission you don't have the attention span for this; but the reasons for Russian action were discussed years ago v=JrMiSQAGOS4 Btw I don't get Russian propaganda; CC and MSNBC haven't a clue about Russia, money is no object for Russia (but it's everything for the oligarchs who seem to run America). Their narrative fell apart after they killed 50,000 kids in Iraq and Afghanistan; they aren't fit to talk about barbarism; bombing the desalination plants in Libya; oil for food; hunt for WMD in Syria, people laughed. Russia and China wrote the book on war; America is the new kid on the block by comparison; still it's winning the propaganda war!? That lecture was from 7 years ago...
1