Comments by "irresistablejewel" (@irresistablejewel) on "What Are Russians Really Saying When they Speak in Euphemisms?" video.
-
2
-
Looking forwards to the follow-up "What The Globalists Are Really Saying When they Speak in Euphemisms".
When the E.U. offered millions in "aid" and America billions in "investment" as co-signatories, it demonstrating that they did not respect the neutrality agreement Ukraine made with Russia.
The Western interests prefer to call their "special military operations" an "intervention" (they usually claim it's to save civilian life, but it never does); these differ from a formal deceleration of war.
While the "3-day operation" is a claim made (up) by the corporate media who are strong supporters of globalism and war; it forms the basis of a number of "straw man fallacies". They are trying to make their argument some more reasonable and since you choose to repeat this; either you are not doing your research properly Prof, or you are willingly distributing misinformation.
Claiming the Russians are "kidnapping" children seems dubious for two reasons (1) Having killed tens of thousands of children in Iraq/Afghanistan it just looks like cynical manipulation trying to claim that the globalists ever cared about people (even their own homeless) and (2) The alternative to removing children from a war zone is to keep them there, the Russians just don't do that.
I believe Lavrov perceives the Western financial contributions not as charity, but as a financial incentive to join them; while it was known breaking the neutrality agreement would lead to conflict.
We now discover Monsanto bought a lot of land; bio-labs; odd oil deals (see H. Biden); so I tend to agree with Lavrov. All this fiddling about; billions sent, I'd say was very provocative indeed.
Russia hasn't made a formal deceleration of war because then different rules apply; just as America has made clear it didn't offer guarantees to Ukraine, just assurances.
These differences diplomats are supposed to understand, but since there's been a complete failure of diplomacy, an assurance means America isn't compelled issue a formal declaration of war.
If you care to notice; the far-right in America are careful not to say America is at war with Russia, it may look like that with all the "lethal aid" (euphemism for "weapons"), but if they do it's WW3.
"Humanitarian evacuations" is not a euphemism; it's not deplorable either, don't be ridiculous. Russia isn't fighting civilians; despite the msm claims; it's soldiers and Western weapon deliveries.
"Russians" = "Russian speaking Ukrainians" might just be how Russia sees this; the "breakaway regions" all voting for independence (2014) all mainly speak Russian; one side in a civil war.
Nobody "recognised" the independence votes, until Russia did in 2022; regions don't really have the power to simply declare independence, but Russia currently occupies them, no coincidence.
The corporate media story-line at the time was people were being marched to the polling booths at gunpoint; it was a ludicrous claim, but some obviously still believe this.
Russia ejected the Western media in Crimea; there was a large turn-out to vote; people tend not to go out with gunmen in the streets, far easier to stuff the ballot boxes innit?
That's when I believe the globalists lost that argument; they resorted to one of their smear campaigns instead of questioning the validity of regions to hold major (independence) referendums.
It doesn't look like the Eastern regions want to be part of Western Ukraine; late 2022 they all vote to rejoin Russia; we don't hear much from them the Western msm is rather selective.
NATO said they wouldn't expand, but look at the map; both they and the EU have done just that; they both tried to recruit Ukraine, is it really not obvious to you Prof what's been going on?
The history of Europe is long; dark and complicated; I doubt Americans understand much in that respect or they wouldn't be so keen on a face-off against Russia on it's own doorstep.
Yes, there's a lot of euphemisms; attempts to sanitize war; but I really do think the Western corporate media are signed up to the concept of war as a business model hence "investment".
Now the globalists want to "double down"; I find this kind of language to be quite revealing. They are looking for a return on the investment made with public money and Ukrainian lives...
Well I think they've lost. What's more I believe they know that. They have the option of going all in, but that equates to nuclear war. Currently that's what the globalists are investing in.
We should know what Russia wants; it's where they've been sitting for almost about 20 months; that and NATO bases gone. It's time for the far-right in America to stop "playing" Europe!
1
-
1