Comments by "irresistablejewel" (@irresistablejewel) on "Why NATO may have to stop a Russian invasion - without the US" video.

  1.  @espirulografo  Sounds like you're the one that's brainwashed: America and it's NATO have left a trail of destruction behind it; usually in support of American economic interest (oil; opium; money). After the 2014 "memorandum" foreign corporations took control of Ukrainian agriculture, that's the "investment" America is trying to protect, but it's lost (rich farmland now covered in mines and cluster munitions; port grain loading facilities destroyed; 40+ labs, possible researching GM crops, no longer operating). While these "NATO interventions to save civilian life" never do (killed tens of thousands of children in Iraq/Afghanistan); American troops still occupy about 20% of Syria (the oil fields) even after the attempted regime change failed; they trashed Libya (NATO justice a lynching). So a NATO intervention in Ukraine would likely start a nuclear war; the transnational corporations got burned and until Ukraine remembers that neutrality agreement looks like it's shrinking. Those in the Eastern states chose to leave Ukraine, then to (re)join Russia lots of sound reasons why; Ukraine went bankrupt (largely due to corruption). The West seems to be believing it's own publicity (their investment is lost).
    1
  2. A bald one; feathering it's own nest and henpecking the EU. Yes, lets go on strike, someone took all the money; keep fighting and one day you too can live on the streets...
    1