Youtube hearted comments of irresistablejewel (@irresistablejewel).

  1. If you recall: Alex Salmond was accused of 14 offences, including two counts of attempted rape, nine of sexual assault, two of indecent assault, and one of breach of the peace; it ended his association with the SNP (the court case and media "circus" was overshadowing party matters, so he quit) and what was the result of the trial? One charge of sexual assault withdrawn (before it got to court); twelve not guilty; one not proven (insufficient evidence). Salmond was awarded £500,000 (costs); it damaged the party and the prosecution had already been advised not to proceed, as the action was likely to fail. Odd that, isn't it? Still it was the season to be smeared, see Jeremy Corbyn: over half of the bullying allegations came from one person; Hodge and her millionaire buddy using the Jewish press to claim they were victims and the right-wing press (just like now) saturating the news (likely as a useful distraction from: PM Johnson; the fragile UK economy; remaining in the EU (best of three? etc). Now I've not seen anything worth voting for in some time; I'm becoming increasing suspicious of the media trying to lead people by the nose; I do not trust the Tory/ Tory light Westminster government and if Nicola Sturgeon has a lot to explain (although no charges have been made) it would be to a Scottish court and not the "Daily Telegraph" or the "Glasgow Herald". I've been encouraged not to deal in "whataboutism"; but compared to Westminster, don't you find potential financial scandals in Holyrood to be "small beer": currently there are legal matters surrounding the third last PM; plus millions and billions diverted to: an America/Russia proxy war; a Garden Bridge (never happened); HS2 cost over-run (something the Tories will likely sell off); an incredibly long list of financial "errors", proposed unfunded tax cuts for millionaires (nearly blew the pension funds), while bets against the pound paid handsomely. So while UKplc continues to get asset stripped, by real companies, is this Scottish scandal really about a £110,000 motor home? In other words, the UK (Pentagon leaks) is involved in a direct war with a nuclear superpower; people in an oil rich country can't afford to turn on the heating; food inflation is going "through the roof"; civil unrest (across Europe) and yet the far-right media wants us to focus on a court case that might happen (or not); the financial "health" of a political rival (while banks; hotel and catering; small businesses close)........ ever feel you are being diverted?....... and when it comes to charitable contributions of "lethal aid", charity begins at home, does it not? It's characters like Blair that should be in court; this is another "side-show" and the courts take ages, so see you same time next year. Now that Stormy lass...
    11
  2. 8
  3. 7
  4. 4
  5. 2
  6. 2
  7. 2
  8. 2
  9. 2
  10. "Bang Showbiz" did mention Putin was looking a bit puffy (but that was about a year ago); around the time the Wall Street Journal was discussing war strategy and SKY news was reporting Russia had run out of missiles. It clearly does simplify matters, for the viewing public, when the corporate media find someone to hate on; but does anyone really believe that President Biden (or Trump) or Putin make all the foreign policy decisions? All these politicians past retirement age with their finger on the nuclear trigger... it just doesn't happen that way! Sorry if it disappoints the mawkish dealing in mystical thinking; but it's not just Putin that wants America's NATO and the EU to keep out of Ukraine. If Putin steps down it will continue y'know. I'm not saying that Putin is completely irrelevant; he's kept a lid on the nationalists who (like the far right "globalists" in America) apparently want a showdown. If you want to call Putin or Russia's actions erratic; what would you call the UK governments actions or the G7's decisions lately? As I understand matters: Ukraine had a neutrality agreement with Russia; the Western interests gave large financial incentives (using public money) to break that agreement and side with them. To me that was a very bad "investment" and "doubling down" (again using public money and Ukrainian lives) either leads to a long cold war, or a short hot one; so I object to sending more to, put simply, the Ukrainian mafia. I'm assuming the main reason back-bencher B Johnson was back in Kyiv is either as a globalist messenger-boy or to get his "cut" (he says he was invited; why?). If I was UK PM (I'm not); I'd let America and the EU do their own dirty work. In my view America is using this conflict to "play" the E.U. to maintain a "competitive advantage" they don't merit. So while the msm have added more names to their hate list; I do believe that's just looking at the finger and not where it's pointing. It seems to be the Russian middle finger pointing upwards; maybe that means they want the globalists to help put a base on Mars, take our collective minds of all the infighting; or they are just being rude. However if you want a big war; Russia and Germany are the "go-to-guys"; China wrote the book on it and the UK is in no position to go to war with superpowers or offer economic advice. A real shame about Ukraine, but the globalists didn't send all that money there because they are charitable; there was another reason (and they don't care about people). Let's not pretend we know what's going on in Russian politics; it's a completely different culture; it's a completely different type of economy, I never saw homelessness when I was there.
    1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1