Comments by "Nattygsbord" (@nattygsbord) on "Styxhexenhammer666"
channel.
-
4
-
2
-
2
-
The problem with all Melanchon, Sanders, Wagenknecht ans such is that refuse to co-operate with nationalist politicians. So they are therefore completely useless. Demaning restricted immigration, anti-islamism and the destruction of the EU is somehow racism nowadays - and therefore impossible to openly support on the left.
So no, the left will never co-operate with the nationalists. Atleast not as long as the left wanna keep their SJW supporters, and support from islamists or black nationalists.
But on the grassroots level I can certainly say that I as a leftwinger would rather pick a rightwing nationalist politician that wanna destroy the EU and do something about immigration, than some useless leftwing coward.
I would never vote for Sanders as long as he think illegal immigrants should not be kicked out or punished. It is impossible to combine a welfare state and a regime that favours workers with open borders or a EU membership.
You have to choose one side. You cannot have it both ways.... but lying fucking cowards like Sanders and Corbyn pretend it is possible so they don't lose SJW-clown voters.
I say such politicians deserve no respect. A politicians job is not to change his opinions to suit the public, no he should stay firm to his beliefs no matter how unpopular they are - and his job is to win the hearts and minds of the voters by having the best arguments.
Fuck the establishment left. The partys wanna be respectable and cooperate with "non-nazis" aka neoliberals. But I rather lose an election that cooperating with Macron, Hillary, Merkel. I want a left that makes deals with UKIP, Le Pen, AfD, the Sweden democrats and so fourth.
Neoliberals, muslims and SJWs are the number1. And not the nationalists.
And I don't think I am alone in feeling this way on the left. Look at the polls regarding UKIP - a party basicly only known for its anti-EU anti-immigration stance... while most voters are ignorant of their marketfundamentalist ideals. Nevertheless did UKIP win strong support in the UK, despite most UKIP voters are standing even to the left of most mainstream leftwing voters in economic policies - and most UKIP voters are more favourable of nationalizing energy companies, postal services and regulating food prices than the average for the British public.
And likewise are the Swedish nationalist party the most popular party among unionized workers in Sweden.
So the top doesn't wanna cooperate with nationalists, while the leftwing grassroots wants to. And the more leftwingers that leaves the left for the nationalists, the stronger will the influence be of the SJWs on the leftwing policies - which in turn will turn off even more leftwing voters.
1
-
Globalization rests on shaky pillars. Unlike national markets, which tend to be
supported by domestic regulatory and political institutions, global markets are only weakly
embedded. There is no global anti-trust authority, no global lender of last resort, no global regulator,
no global safety net, and, of course, no global democracy. In other words, global markets suffer from
weak governance, and are therefore prone to instability, inefficiency, and weak popular legitimacy.
1
-
One of the most important lessons one can learn from history in the healtcare field is that disease prevention has been the most important factor behind the longer lives people live today, when people normally die when they are 80, instead of 30 as in the early 1800s.
No effective medinces existed in the 1800s and the first blockbuster drugs came in the 1930s, so how was it then possible for people to live twice as long in England before good medicines had been invented?
The answer is disease prevention. Do away with the causes for disease so people don't get sick in the first place. One way of doing this is of course controlling immigration.
But it is also important with other things like getting people to eat healthy, sleep, workout, vaccination, taking a shower and use soap, don't eat where you take a shit, build sewers, drain swamps to get rid of the breeding grounds for malaria mosquitos, have good housing so people don't have to live with sick people or breath in mold from a badly ventilated apartment.
Disease prevention will become more important in the future as antibiotics will become less and less effective. And importing migrants with exotic infectious diseases will only risk of undoing decades of progress that have been done in eradicating disaeses that previously caused much harm in the western world.
The world is at risk of going back to the 1800s again where we had no effective medicines.
I am an optimist and I see that even the stupid unhygienic people in the 1800s managed to double life expectancy from 25 to 50 years without medicines or flush toilets. So I think people will still be able to live long lives also in the future - as long as one doesn't get sick, because then there is no longer any get-out-of-jail free cards that will save you anymore.
The worst case is if we fail in the disease prevention, then we will go back to the early 1800s when people didn't die so much from cancer or heart diseases as they did from virus or bacterial infections.
Doing away with globalism completly is not a preferable thing as I sees it, but some controls are obviously necessary. And illegal immigration needs to stopped completly.
And having Pharmaceutical factories in India that on a daily basis leaks out medicines into the water and thereby cause resistance is simply unacceptable and should be punished by the world community. If they don't get their shit togheter, then they should not get any foreign medicines at all until they get their house in order.
And the mistreatment of animals in CAFOs should also be stopped, and we should boycot countries that export meat that uses antibiotics to treat the many diseases that CAFO animals get. The meat industry is using 80-90% of all the antibiotics in society, so if they can't stop making animals sick then they should be forced to shut down and get replaced by old school farmers that doesn't
mistreat their animals.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The demographic structure of Europe makes a civil war unlikely. You will not see old grandmas go out with an AR-15 here. Old people are not like that.
And its good that old people die off and their outdated worldview. Most old people here in Sweden still believe that Russia will invade us and that we are living in the cold war and that we Europeans need to stick togheter in the EU to have a chance... and that a new world war would happen if nationalism replaces the EU.
And the younger generation are too young to remember the days before the EU and therefore believe in the stupid pro-EU propaganda that says it is thanks to the EU that you can travel, work in other countries, and trade with them.
All of this is of course lies. I traveled 3 times to Italy, 1 time to Spain and 1 time to the UK before Sweden joined the EU in 1995. I knew lots of people who worked in other countries before Sweden joined the EU. And I had no problem buying Swiss chocolate, English computer games, Japanese Nintendos, Made in Taiwan toys, or French glass if I wanted to.
If the EU stays alive another half a century they will start telling us lies that the EU makes it possible for us to get bread from our grocery stores and that life would be impossible without it...
The EU is useless and I hope it gets abolished soon. But I don't think people here will like it. I guess Sweden is very typical as an EU country more than Britain. Britain have always been proud over their own country and over their own traditional ways and have therefore always stood in opposition to the Franc-German alliance within the EU. They are known as the boring naysayer among the Europhiles.
Sweden on the other hand is a cucksucker. Our government always sucks Macrons globalist dick. Sometimes our Swedish political class are happy to do so, and sometimes its not. But the people don't like it. The people like the EU, but they hate that the EU takes power over more and more areas in our lives. Since the early 1990s have the EU expanded its powers enormously.
The union is no longer just about trading goods with other European countries and throw up a wall of tariffs against the non-EU countries.
Now the EU decides over countries economic policies, their border controls (and thus immigration policies), their foreign policy, their banking system, their legal system, their agricultural policies, their fishing policies, their legal system and so on.
And now the EU even wants more power. It wants to force all countries to join the Euro currency. It wants to take control over the internet. It wants its own military. It wants to take over the role of taxation and spending from the member countries. It wants a common healthcare policy. And it wants to also force down a common carbon tax down everyones throat and all countries should be forced to take in immigrants.
And people are stupid, but they are not blind. They underestimate the power the EU has, so they therefore fail to point where the problem is. But they have started to have a small feeling that the EU have too much power already, and that some of it needs to be rolled back.
Germany and Sweden are the most Europhile (or should I say "Eurotard") countries in Europe. But even here in Sweden our biggest Europhile party nearly got wiped out the last election because people think the EU has gone too far. People are half assed cowards, they don't wanna abolish the EU, instead they want to reform it. But the EU cannot be reformed so its just a waste of time... and all waiting for it will only cause frustration and create pain.
More people will then probably become tired and then either join hardline Brexiteers or liberaldemocrat EU uber alles groups.
One thing is for sure, Europeans are not ready for accepting a common policy for everything - which the EU dreams of and tries to create without the consent of the peoples of Europe.
And this point I am so tired of the EU and I rather wish that Trump dropped a nuke over Brussels and got all this thing over with.
I used to be a moderate, but then I became a Euroskeptic. But when the EU started to wanting to destroy the internet in the early 2000s I became hateful towards the EU. And now I am so radicalized that I just want all this shit burned to the ground at all cost, and I am prepared to let my own country take a heavy hit to get things done.
I have absolutly no trust in the corrupt incompetent leaders in Brussels. I refuse to serve in an EU military to fight for French colonial interests in a shithole country in Africa. I refuse to see my taxes increase to pay for welfare and retirement of Romanians, Greeks and other peoples I have never met.
I will never accept to have my internet censored because it is inconvenient to the EU elite, and because some retarded old media dinosaurs are too lazy to come up with new buisness models to make money out of music or movies.
So fuck the EU. Nothing good have ever come out of it the last 25 years.
Only censorship, economic problems, hollowing out of democracy, and importation of criminality and foreign diseases from other EU countries. And thanks to EUs (frontex) mismanagement of the border controls did the so called "refugee crisis" happen.
Loving the EU is like loving cancer. It is very hard to see anything positive coming out of it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1