Comments by "Nattygsbord" (@nattygsbord) on "Why Leopard 1 is ideal for Ukraine now!" video.

  1. What? I thought that GAZ AA was better than all western kit
    5
  2.  @historyandhorseplaying7374  Abrams have not had any problems with destroying the same shitty russian armor in Iraq in 1991 and 2003 that is used in Ukraine today. Indeed Saddam Hussein had a more modern army than the garbage army with 1950s equipment (with the old rusty russian junk quality that they are so famous for). So sending them to Ukraine would absolutly make sense. And if they are so old and needs to be replaced. Then they should be sent to Ukraine. Because why not? If USA needs to get newer tanks soon anyways, then why not give away 2000 unused tanks to Ukraine then? That would save the American tax payers money to not having to pay upkeep for all those old tanks.
    5
  3. Why not T-34? I heard russian say its the best tank in the world.
    4
  4. Russia have lost nearly all its wars the last 150 years... The Crimean war, the russo-japanese war, World war 1, the Polish-Bolshevik war, it got humiliated in the winter war, it then got humiliated again in the continuation war, it suffered enormous humiliating defeats against nazi Germany was kept on life support from lend lease aid from USA and Britain. It then when on to lose the war in Afghanistan and lost the war in Chechenya. So yea russia sucks at fighting wars. And now russia have started an evil war of aggression again. And thousands of russian families have lost a family member in this stupid war. It might seem a bit cold hearted to say.. but it doesn't make it less true.. when I say that the russian people only got themselves to blame.
    2
  5. Thankfully its not fighting on a modern battlefield, but against a 3rd world country opponent.
    2
  6. They got some tanks from Belarus that they probably have lost by now. They also took some tanks from India only to also lose them in the field. And now they use T-55 and T-62 tanks plundered from museums. So I look forward to them buying some North Korean tanks that are older than granpa. And after that they can use their T-34 togheter with their GAZ AA trucks.
    2
  7. The orc black sea fleet is hiding on the eastern coast of the black sea. Nazi russia is importing ammunition from North Korea. So pathethic putler is getting nowhere. With this speed of advance will it take over 100 years before all of Ukraine has been taken by him. But it will not be taken by him. He will be dead by then.
    2
  8.  @historyandhorseplaying7374  Well all tanks have their drawbacks. If this tank is so heavy, fuel consuming, difficult to maintain, cannot drive over bridges etc etc... then do USA use this tank today if it is so worthless? It does not make any sense.
    2
  9. nobody cares, everything that isn't saying nazi-russia winning this war in 3 days is cope according to kremlin
    2
  10. Ukraine have been for peace all along. The only ones keeping this war going is nazi-russia that illegally have troops inside another countrys borders.
    1
  11.  @filipmisko9363  Worthless comment not answering my question.
    1
  12.  @filipmisko9363  There are a few imported from south east asia. And more can be probably be bought from North Korea.
    1
  13. those tanks are sent to ukraine and not to russia you ignorant 🙄
    1
  14. Russian tech sucks and is inferior so they better just stop wasting their time on an unwinnable war.
    1
  15. baseless claim by rusbot
    1
  16. We all heard about russian game changers that went nowhere. The Chechen warriors in the beginning of the war was hyped in pro-russian propaganda as if they were tough Highland warriors or something. But it turns out that they have been nothing but rapist and tic toc warriors and completely uselss in this war. VDV and Spetsnaz have been called superweapons - but still did VDV get crushed by some Ukrainian reservist unit at the battle of Hostomel. So the elite of the russian elite lost to a low quality unit of the Ukrainian army. That is just embaressing. When russia sent Terminator tanks to Ukraine we all heard they would be game changers. But then everything became silent. And one by one have those vehicles been destroyed, just like any other russian tank. The S-300 and S-400 missiles have russia called the best air defence system in the world. And yet we have seen them fail time and time again to even protect high value targets. They failed to protect the flagship Moskva from getting sunk. They failed to protect russias strategic bombers at Engels air force base even against a 50 year old drone that was big easy slow flying target flying for over an hour over russian territory. And then of course they failed to incercept a missile attack that killed and wounded 30 russian officers in a single attack. The Kinzal missiles are another supposed wunderwaffe nazi-russia have. Botniks claimed it was impossible to shot down this "hypersonic" wunderwaffe. But that didn't prevent a Patriot air defence system from shooting it down. We all laugh at russias worthless aircraft carrier. And there are enough videos debunking Armata and SU57 as the garbage junk they are. Many more examples could be made, but I rest my case for now.
    1
  17. And yet do nazi-russia use tanks despite having lost thousands of them...
    1
  18.  @historyandhorseplaying7374  A You just show ignorance of history. Saddams army in 1991 was considered as one of the most powerful in the world. It had modern weapons from USA, France and russia. Their russian tanks which are the same used in Ukraine today were less outdated 30 years ago then what they are today. Their troops were combat experienced after having fought a long war with Iran - unlike the mobilized russian clowns sent to ukraine today without any training, experience, motivation and not with anything more than an old rifle an an incomplete set of camouflag clothes. Using steel helmets and no body armor was not seen as outdated back in 1991, like the russian army today that lacks both kevlar helmets and bullet proof vests. So yea, I consider Saddams military to be qualitative superior. B) USA have already built those tanks. So you will not pay anything for building any new tanks. Those tanks just costs money to store and cost money to despose of as it have to be done in an enviromentally friendly and buraucratically correct way. So it would be a good affair for the US tax payer to just give a few hundred tanks to Ukraine than just paying for keeping them. Keeping them will only increase the burden of the US tax payer. And all those extra tanks USA bought that it never uses was just a gift to the US military industrial complex as the US military obviously doesn't need them as they are not using them or caring to upgrade them to modern standards. C) I don't care about your feelings. Your country have signed the Budapest agreement where USA promised to help Ukraine if it was attacked by a foreign power, in exchange for Ukraine giving up all its nuclear weapons. Now is Ukraine attacked by a foreign power so it is up to USA to live up to is promise. Doing anything else would be a breach of contract.
    1
  19. You are clueless about military history. Nazi-russia have lost nearly every war it have fought the last 150 years. It have also lost nearly every battle in Ukraine. And nazi russian losses in Ukraine are already much higher than they were when they left Afghanistan - which were another war they lost. So nazi-russia will lose this war as well. It is just a matter of political will to provide Ukraine with the tools to victory
    1
  20.  @jetfighter200  They were not given the promised amounts of weapons from the west. They only got 20% of the promised 1 million artilllery shells from the west when the offensive started. And they had no ATACMS or fighter jets. So once again you just spew out nazi-russian propaganda. And with your own logic would it be impossible also for nazi-russia to win this war. As their offensives against Ukrainian minefields and artillery at Vuhledar have failed even more catastrophically than the Ukrainian offensive. Fact is that the nazi-russian losernoobs lost the battle for Hostomel and Kyiv and was forced to give up ground. Then the nazi-russian forces lost the battle for Sumy and had to give up even more ground. And later on they lost the entire Charkiv province in one battle. And then they lost the strategically important Snake island. And then they lost the big city Khersun. And orc navy have returned to the eastern black sea because they are too afraid to lose their remaining ships to Ukrainian missiles and drones. So they are about to become the first naval power in history to lose against a country without a navy.
    1
  21. Greece and Turkey should disarm and send their stuff to Ukraine.
    1
  22. russia have always sucked at war
    1
  23. No one listens to you. You cannot even spell the name correctly, which shows that you know nothing about tanks.
    1
  24. russland = Nutzlos losernoobs Krimkrieg - Russland verloren Russisch-Japanischer Krieg - Russland verloren Erster Weltkrieg - Russland verloren Polnisch-Sowjetischer Krieg - Russland verloren Winterkrieg - Russland wurde schwer gedemütigt Fortsetzungskrieg - Russland wurde schwer gedemütigt Zweiter Weltkrieg - Russland wird schwer gedemütigt und überlebt dank das Lend-Lease Act Krieg in Afghanistan - Russland verloren Erster Tschetschenienkrieg - Russland verloren Russlands angriffskrieg gegen Ukraina - Russland wurde schwer gedemütigt
    1
  25. Only you have claimed this. Hows your own wunderwaffen doing? Heard that Kinzals are no invincable and that terminator tanks have not been a game changing wunderwaffe.
    1
  26.  @karakondzula1388  Russian tanks according to russian ministry of defense: https://youtu.be/Ra4xsLImPgg?si=X-jCB5t-9gFzkl5J
    1
  27. Not more shit than the junk russia is fielding
    1
  28. Equipment have gotten ridiculously expensive. That is true. A weapon with a price tag and capabilities somehwere between Leopard1 and Leopard2 is probably the optimal right now. But no such tank exist. One argument for Leopard2 would be its crew survivability. Because a good tank crew is more valuable than a tank. If you constantly send new tank crews up into space like Orcland does, then of course you will never get an experienced effective fighting force. But if you have some Leopard 2 crews that fights and most of the time survives when their tank gets taken out - then those men can fight another day and keep on building upon previous experiences.
    1
  29. Nazi russia lost the battles of hostomel, kyiv, chernigiv, sumy, sieverski-donetsk, charkiv, snake island, khersun, vuhledar and avdiivka... and now all of the sudden you think that you are a winner?? 😂😂 Russians not only suck at warfare. It also seems that they also suffers from a total lack of self-awareness. 😂🤣
    1
  30. nazi russias days are numbered. its demographics is in ruins, its military is in ruins, its economy is in ruins.
    1
  31. Nazi-russia is more corrupt than Ukraine so I guess that makes it the biggest shithole in the world. And with the current rate of advance will take over 100 years before all of Ukraine is occupied. And by then will most of us here in the west have died of old age, while Nazi-russias population have fallen under 100 million, as young males dies before they can have kids, and the elderly commie nostalgics dies off. And the ruskie girls become mail-order brides in other countries.
    1
  32. He goes to Switzerland to hold peace talks without russia. And Zelensky still holds a maximalist view on peace.
    1
  33. botski cope
    1
  34. And t-72 is crap crap compared to Leopard2A6
    1
  35. botnik
    1
  36. Ukraine can win even if russia had a death star you mean. I wouldn't be surprise if corruption and incompetence would make it malfunction.
    1