Comments by "Nattygsbord" (@nattygsbord) on "Ukraine: The Problem with Mine-Clearing Tanks" video.

  1. 4
  2. Russia economy is badly battered and ammunition production is likely to fall off a cliff next year. Already today is Ukraine firing more artillery shells than russia. And with ATACMS arriving and the last years horrible russian losses in artillery and MLRS will make the future even worse for russia. And North Korean artillery shells sent to russia is like putting a plaster on a guy who just had his entire leg chopped off. Its low quality junk in too small numbers to make any difference. The next year is likely getting horrible for russia. Its economy is going down, its artillery is disapearing, its missiles are going away, its helicopters are held far away by ATACMS, its black sea fleet cannot stay in Crimea, the country is running out of tanks. And now it is using 90 year old military trucks (GAZ AA), 70 year old tanks (T-55), 130 year old rifles (Mosin Nagant), and 70 year old armored personnel carriers (BTR-50). And I don't think russia would be using such old equipment and needlessly put their own soldiers lives at risk if better more modern equipment was available. And to me this is a sign that russia have suffered extremely heavy unsubstainable losses. And if russias professional army equipped with T-90 tanks couldn't defeat ukrainians back when russia had enormous superior in tanks and artillery that could fire 63.000 shots per day - then I don't think russia can win this war when it have fewer tanks than ukraine and firing less shots per day than Ukraine, and having artillery that is of a lower quality. And russias professional army is also dead. Its counter-battery radars are gone. And now are only badly equipped, poorly trained, and badly motivated troops all that russia is having left. So I likely think russia is heading towards a loss. And I think that even a Trump election win would be too little too late to save Putin from a loss. He have already lost too much men and equipment by then to turn the tables and win the war. And even without american artillery shells would the rest of the free world be able to provide enough shells for Ukraine to keep it fighting and making the final push needed to drive home victory against a totally exhausted enemy that have no tanks or artillery left, and only got lots of useless meat - men that gets blown up by ukrainian artillery before they get the chance to even fire upon any ukrainian infantry. And without artillery and tanks you cannot make any succesful offensive tanks. And russia lacks both, and its infantry lacks both training and weapons - so its combat value sucks, and especially so in offensive operations. This Avdiika offensive might be the last major offensive russia could pull off in this war. And it should be noted that this offensive is done with with BTR-50 and the last modern tanks russia got. And even unit in the russian army - VDV looklike complete rookies unsure how to act on a battlefield. So things do not look good for russia. The Ukrainian army might not be well trained professional soldiers according to western standards. Indeed they are far from it, and especially after all losses they have suffered. But Ukraine do on the other hand have lots of good kit, and artillery superiority both in quality and quantity and that is worth a lot.
    1
  3. 1
  4. 1