Comments by "Nattygsbord" (@nattygsbord) on "" video.

  1. Turbocat, Thundercat, Hellcat, Swat kat
    2
  2. Turbo kat, from Swat kats
    2
  3. Maybe a smaller number of planes could be useful. And yes weapons and fuel will be stored inside. And that will increase drag and fuel consumption, but I guess it will be easier to make the plane more fuel effiecent than a smaller F35 that have to carry much inside it with the little space it have... thus making it unaerodynamic and giving it a crappy wingloading. A bigger plane could carry bigger weapons (like big long range air-to-air missiles), be more aerodynamic in proportion to its size and thus more fuel effiecent. And yes, the aircraft will be unsexy and useless in dogfighting close combat manouvers. Its more of a silent killer just throwing missiles at the enemy from long ranges before he could realize that he is being shot at. This aircraft just takes the same design idea of the F35 just a step further. So speed, ability to turn, close combat weapons, acceleration and such have not just only become deeply down prioritized, but now done away with almost completely.
    1
  4. flying off a carrier deck, and landing on a carrier
    1
  5. Fatcat
    1
  6.  @Vincewett  Canards are so totally unamerican
    1