Comments by "Nattygsbord" (@nattygsbord) on "VisualPolitik EN" channel.

Ivan, just go home. How hard can it be?
11
You havn't watched the video then.
8
I believe that those weapons are meant like a strategic reserve in case a war happens. All major countries have such reserves of more weapons than they need. I do not think USA should send all of it to Ukraine, but giving away say a thousand vehicles and let EU share more than half of the bill would be fair and help everyone involved - USA, EU and Ukraine. Of course could Canada, Australia, Norway and Britain also contribute funds.
7
@AsunaYuukiSAO3 I consider this strategic reserve to be like how a prepper stores food for a rainy day. Its good to have in case a war happens or some major world event. Even if there are a long period of peace and prosperity you might wanna have those stocks. However just like canned food do not last forever is the same true for military weapons and ammunition. It must therefore regulary be rotated, because it will get bad and hit expiration date. And not just because 40 years might have passed and countries around the world have invented and built more powerful tanks. But also because chemicals inside an artillery shell deteriorate with time and becomes unreliable and unsafe to use after some time, and an artillery grenade might explode inside a gun barrel. And also equipment gets bad by wear and tear as you use them and suffer from material fatigue. Fighter aircrafts will fall apart mid air and need lots of repairs for each hour of flying if they fly much and therefore undergo much wear and tear. And the same is also true even for battle tanks, where the quality of the armor falls with each decade. The quality of the steel falls due to material fatigue caused by stress like when you drive the tank in a forest over big rocks in a bumpy terrain, and rust and corrosion also makes the armor more brittle. But even if you leave the machines unused in a garage for decades, they will still not have the same good quality as when they were created. The rubber around cables have dried up and needs to be replaced, oil filters needs to be changed, fuel tanks needs to be cleaned, rats could have bitten and destroyed the electronics and so on. So I suggest that just like a prepper eats up his old food and buys newer food to replace it - should the american military also do the same. One should look at this as a great chance to modernize the US military and free up funds for making the necessary transition over to a modern vehicle park and have more modern ammunition ready in case a big war with China happens. And meanwhile are russia as a big threat to USA being destroyed. Its a big win. Every old M113 that are not needed for museums or film makers should be sent to Ukraine. And USA got much more Bradleys and Abrams that it needs, and just a fraction of that huge stock in the desert could make an enormous difference in Ukraine.
5
Indeed. Putins regime is a criminal terrorist regime and should be treated accordingly.
2
Yea Ivan, a captured Abrams tank of the older version completly compensates for the more than 500 russian tanks that has been captured by Ukraine.
2
There would be no point in having 400 HIMARS in Ukraine if you don't have missiles for them. Ukraine have only 16, but they use them very intensivly day and night with soldiers working in day and night shifts.
2
Either we fight russia today, or we will have to fight then tomorrow and see China invade Taiwan. Its easier to just deal with a problem while it is small and more manageable than just letting the problem of criminal gangster regimes grew bigger. Hitler was easier to stop in september 1938 than he was in 1941.... and aside from this money saving wisdom, are western countries morally obliged to help a fellow democracy, stop a genocide and honor the Budapest agreement. Its about our honor, and our moral duties. Concepts that pro-russian trolls will never understand.
2
I was not a Russophobe before this war started. But after seeing Russias behaviour in video clip after video clip the last 7 months I have become a Russophobe. I carry that badge with honor. It shows that I am an enligtened person. Someone who cares about truth, fairness, justice etc. The civilized world should build a wall to the border with Mordor for the coming thousands of years, until the primive brutal barbarian Kingdom have sorted its own problems out.
2
Russia used to fire 60.000 shells per day. Now they are firing 10.000. And despite this superiority have we seen russia losing battle after battle and retreating time and time again. Retreating from Kyiv, retreating from Chernigiv, losing Sumy, losing Charkiv, losing Snake island, losing Khersun. Plus that russia have launched multiple failed offensives at Siversky Donetsk river, and Vuhledar and suffered catastrophic losses. So this noob army can be defeated.
2
WTF?!? Where are all the black voices??? This is such a raycist channel
1
Move to russia then 😁 I can help you pack your bag if you'd like.
1
I call him a baldheaded dwarf. His strange positioning of his eyes and nose reminds me of the Groke in the moomin series. He is a Hitler with nuclear weapons, a shorty with a Napoleon complex in a double meaning of the expression... as he is extremely insecure about his length, and he is also believing himself to be a great General. The Putain is undenibly a cruel bloodthirsty murderer, and a short coward hiding behind his nukes. But he still remains a stupid failure. Both Hitler and Napoleon did at least conquer Europe and their empires came crashing down after years of constant wars. But all Putin could do was to take 20% of Ukraine. More than that could his useless military not achieve. It even failed at subjugating the poorest country in Europe. It still havn't gained air superiority over Ukraine after nearly a year of war. And yet do some orchs in Mordor still believe that they could take on the entire Nato and still win 🙄
1
@alvinlevy5502 Pro-russians have said that Ukraine is toast ever since the first day of this war. And since then have they retreated and lost half of the land they once occupied, and they have suffered high losses on the battlefield. So everything is just about political will in the west if we want to allow Ukraine to win. And I do of course want Ukraine to win. Everything else would be treason.
1
The special military operation goes according to plan. Russia have lost 6000 men and killed 100.000 Ukrainian soldiers, but still needs to mobilize 300.000 men for some reason? 🤔 The Russian plan is so good that it even have survived a few minor setbacks... the failed attack to take Hostomel airport the first days of the war, failed push to take Kyiv, the failed pincer movement in the east, the loss of the flagship Moskva, the very costly and failed attempt of a river crossing, the loss of Charkiv province and the destruction of the 1st Guards tank army. And snake island was just abandoned. And then did Ukraine succesfully strike against the well guarded bridge at Kerch. More land was also taken during the battle for Charkov in one single day, than Russia managed to conquer in months of fighting. But don't worry. All of this was just a part of the Russian plan. Putin is 5D chess player.
1
@cuddifrom6 I take your comment as a big insult. I said all the time that Russia are winning and I are stand by that. Russia invasion great success!! 👍👍
1
@cuddifrom6 Finally you realize. 😉👍
1
I never cared about winning myself. For me the important thing is to make the other side lose. And this war have been devestating for Russia, and it is only going to get worse for them. Mother Russia will not being able to stand up for years after the gangbang over 40 countries are giving her.
1
Improve your english Ivan, I cannot understand what you mean.
1
If you got 100 high precision bombs you can use. Where would you use them? Bombing the Ukrianian military so you can win the war? Or using them to bomb schools, family housing apartments, hospitals and museums to spread terror? The Russians choose the latter option. That is only speeding up Russias own military defeat. The more they try to bomb civilians the faster do they bring about their own military defeat.
1
Russia is as strong an a grey haired man in retirement age. Because that is the age of its military equipment. Russias military muscles are weak, and the Russian army is seen as a joke around the world 😂😂 The Russian economy is smaller than that of Spain, despite it have 140 million people and its landmass cover 12 time zones. 😂 But despite is tiny economy, its technological backwardness, its cultural backwardness, do some Russian nationalists still believe that their 3rd world country is a super power en par with USA and China 🙄😂 Well having nuclear bombs does not automatically makes you qualified to call yourself a superpower, Pakistan and North Korea also got nuclear weapons, and they are just as little being superpowers as Russia. 😂😂
1
Russia is losing. The only question is how badly. Had Russia had a more a smarter man in power would this war already been over. But as this war drags on and Russia is being destroyed on the battlefield are there no loner any reasons for negotiations with them. Once the Russian army is destroyed can Ukraine take back all their land and the Kerch bridge can be demolished. But as Russia have taken this evil war this war, do I feel that it is even more reason to not give Mordor any chance of recovering soon. Missiles should be moved forward to Crimea so the entire Russian black sea fleet can be sunk. And Belarus can be invaded and liberated, and a democratic regime can be installed there. And once that has been done, then should Russia realize that it is time to give up this war. There are no upsides of continuing the fight.
1
Europe have money, but no weapons. USA have weapons, but not much political will to spend money. So when a few pro-russian traitors in congress blocks weapons shipments to Ukraine, there is not much Europe can do to help Ukraine. It does not matter if you got thousands of billions of Euros or dollars if you cannot turn that money into artillery shells here and now.
1
The west are not copying russias tactics. But you are correct that the west have much to learn from russia. Russia is a great warning example of how to not make things for the west. Russian artillery is garbage in every metric compared to the west. Shorter range, slower reload time, crappy logistics, less precision, requires more manpower, requires more time to prepare for fire, requires more time to dismount and move away a russian vehicle after firing. The russian doctrine is wasteful, ineffiecent, and costs much money for very little gain.
1
It has nothing to do with nuclear threats? nothing to do with him commiting genocide and start wars of aggression like a modern day Hitler? No, no, no you say it has all to do natural resources somehow - because of some strange unproven conspiration theory of course. Why else would Alex Jones be on team russia?
1
@nikhilsangle3915 " what Ukrainian army did in DPR and LPR before the war." You mean the fake claims about Ukrainian neonazis killing Russians? Sorry I don't buy that crappy lie. Come up something new. You already tried that fake claim regarding Georgia, that they were mass murdering Russians too. - Something which I have hard to believe. If Georgia is a neo-nazi Russophobic state, then why do it allow in hundreds of thousands of Russian draft dodgers? And why do Russians wanna go there if that place is so evil? I mean wouldn't it be like jews moving to nazi-Germany if the Russian states claims about Georgia was true. All Russia have said about Ukraine has been silly nonsense as well. You say that Ukraine is nazi, despite their government is democratically elected and Zelensky himself have jewish blood in his body. Russia claims to protect the Russian minority while you utterly destroy Russian speaking cities like Mariupol. You say the Zelensky is murdering the Russian speaking minority. Which seems very odd, since Zelensky is Russian speaking himself 🙄 You say that you are fighting against neo-nazis. While you have the neonazi Wagner group fighting along side the Russian army. So how you can denazify a country by sending neonazis into that country is beyond my comprehension. And all things I say here are just a few examples. Just the tip of the ice berg. Those things alone are enough for me to discredit all credibility of the Russian perspective. There is no point in listening to what Russia has to say anymore. Its just all complete nonsense.
1
I think Macron have his hands less tied than Scholz at the home stage. Scholz is battleing with upcoming elections in many German provinces where pro-russian AfD might win big victories so appeasing the Rusbots is a thing he might consider important to not lose votes to them. He is also battling pro-russian voices within his own party - the socialdemocrats. So his hands are a bit tied. While Macrons presidential powers are great and give him free hands to do what he wants. But then there are of course 30% of the French that totally oppose military aid to Ukraine, while 50% of the french people supports it. However it is in French geo strategic interest to fight the russian cancer in Africa, if France wish to keep influence in that continent. And indeed, think what you like about French colonialism.. but its certainly better than the russian alternative... just look at all crimes against humanity done by communism during the 1900s...
1
Well killing cruise missiles and drones that kills innocent civilians shouldn't be seen as promoting death and suffering. Rather it does the opposite
1
@LA25-d6x There is 0% chance that Odesa will be taken. Russia can launch some missile strikes against those two towns, but that not the same thing as conquering them and winning the war. Nazi-Germany could bomb London with V-1 and V-2 bombs, but that did not change the strategic situation one bit. And that you are not a russian makes your point of view look even less favorbly to me. People here in the west with all access to information should know better. Russia have spent most of their military force the last 2 years. And look at the map where that got them. Aside from Zaporizhzhia and Khersun Oblast they took in the beginning of the war have all military gains been microscopic. Thousands of tanks, artillery pieces and men lost for a few hundred meters of muddy lands or ruins of a village or town. Now are the scale tipping over in Ukraines favor as they get more and more artillery shells as wests ammunition factories finally begin to produce more. They get F16 fighter jets. They get ATACMS missiles. And hopefully will they soon also get Taurus and Gripen. And meanwhile are russias economic reserves running out and their oil refineries gets taken out one by one. Russia will run into a brick wall where it cannot advance anymore. And that will lead to a stalemate. And in the future will Ukraine then be able to outspend russia in artillery shells and can blast their way forward through russian defences with minimal costs of lives, while russian manpower losses are being maximized. Likely will russia see that the game is up and give up and give back all stolen land. Or the war can continue and Ukraine eats up each russian land conquest bit by bit through artillery fire.
1
@attilamarics3374 Botnik, even russian military bloggers calls the Siverskyi Donets river crossing a big failure. And the russians did make the same mistake 4 times over. If you know so little about military history you should not comment and insult other people. I think that you should skip commenting on the war on Ukraine and focus your time and energy on something you are good at. Play tetris or whatever what you russians are good at. Even just posting vodka lol videos would be better than this idiotic war russia started
1