Comments by "Nattygsbord" (@nattygsbord) on "Daily Mail World" channel.

I think I get contradictory information everywhere about everything that surround this sub.. so why not about this? According to my own most recent knowledge have this sub been certified for 1500 meters below surface. But that is far from the 4000 meters depth of Titanic. And that window have not been pressure tested for the depths of Titanic - which the former chief of submarine rescue of the Swedish navy considered to be "very strange", and my personal impression is that this swedish navy guy mostly thought that it was probably that windows fault that the submarine did crack and sunk.. eventhough he didn't say so outright. However he did not rule out other explanations like electric failure, but thought it was more unlikely. Personally I believe guess that a broken window caused this. And the second most likely alternative explanation why the ship sunk, would be material fatigue. Maybe this thin carbonfibre construct could handle a few dives, but after a pair of dives at 4000 meters down had the walls from the submarine undergone too much stress under its lifetime, so it started to crack - and once a tiny crack had been created it was game over. The submarine was instantly destroyed by the enormous pressure of sea water. And with instantly I mean less than a second, say 0.2 seconds. And after 0.2 seconds had passed was the 6 ton submarine just sea wreck and everyone inside dead. And the uboat now probably just looklike a beer can that someone has jumped on - such are the powerful forces that we are talking about here..
2
Me neither. If I wanted to explore titanic I could just as well do it through a remote controlled submarine without risking my own life. And frankly, there are many more interesting ships in this world than Titanic.
2
I am not a diver, or from the english speaking world. But had I known that it was even possible to sail this dangerous death trap of a sub, then I would have tried to warn people. This uboat is so silly and dumb and so dangerous and no emergency tool kit what so ever - this sub was just a disaster waiting to happen. And this uboat now ended up killing its own creator.
2
Rusbot compares apples with oranges to make russia look better. The T55 and T54 tanks sent to Ukraine by russia have no upgrades at all. While the M55S is a very much upgraded tank that could be said to be equal to a 1990s tank in performance unlike the 70 year old russian junk. And Ukraine does not use any T62 tanks in battle. They only use those as recovery vehicles. So botnik is trying to spread misinformation here.
2
Nothing personal. We just hate your country.
2
Its a bit more scary to die deep under water. At least that is what I and many others think. And this way of dying is a bit unusual. And I think it highlight a much needed debate - why should ordinary people pay rescue operations for other peoples stupid hobbies?
1
Hurrah is the battlecry of Russian troops as they rush forward towards the enemy lines. The japanese battlecry "Banzai" also means somethin like hurrah https://youtu.be/FtfNtKVlys0?t=7
1
You mean like not lying, looting, murder, terrorize innocent people, raping 10 year old girls, shooting at ambulances, torturing, acting like a hypocrite, supporting wars of aggression? Yea I agree. To hell with Russia.
1
He constructor could have learned much from the past - but he did not do so. Having a hatch that only can be opened from the outside is a stupid thing - we knew that from the Apollo 1 disaster where astronauts could not get out when a fire started. And this design for an uboat is bad for the same reasons. And it would also have been impossible for the men to get out and get fresh air if they had been able to come up to the surface safely - so then they would have suffocated to death for that reason instead.
1
I agree. The company should pay every cent of the rescue operation. If you have a stupid hobby that requires rescue ships and submarines, or helicopters flying up to mountain tops - then you should pay for it yourself.
1
proof?
1
This submarine was not regulated at all. And the billionaire who built this sub hated regulations. In the end would that come up and bite him in the ass. Ironically would then Capitalism end up killing this billionaire. He wanted to save money by cutting back on safety - and that took his life.
1
Murder is not the right word. But it is clearly behaviour so reckless that it is criminal. Its like when an electrician does do a bad job and cheating and ending up creating an unsafe bathroom that kills a person with an electric current. Indeed causing an electric fire that burns up someones home or kill someones dog is bad enough.
1
@the.parks.of.no.return Well he also died himself on board this ship, so I don't think his intention was killing people. But his reckless attitude towards safety, made this submarine a danger - and an accident was just waiting to happen it.
1
@jonymanay "Its time for people to take responsibility for their actions" I agree. Let the company Ocean gate pay the rescue workers. Tax payers should not have to pay for other peoples stupid hobbies. If people needs to constantly be rescued by a helicopter because of their mountain climbing hobby then they should pay for it themself, since their own reckless behaviour is at fault.
1
@jonymanay It a moose hit my car it was not my fault, I was not being reckless and excercising a hobby at societys expense. And as I said earlier if some middle class people constantly needs to be picked up by a helicopter for hundreds of thousands of dollars then they should pay for it out of their own pocket. What is so hard to understand about that? I think tax money should be used for government functions, the military, the police and so on. And if a billionaire gets a cancer because of bad luck, then of course he should get help (like anyone else) from the healthcare system which should give people help according to need and not according to the size of someones wallet. Someone who have been hit by a car and is bleeding should get help before someone who just want a regular health check, or vaccination and before someone who is worried about a mosqouito bite that likely will heal within 3 days. I don't like people who abuse the system. Having socialism where we take money from responsible people and give it to irresponsible people is nothing I am in favor of. I think it is unfair. And I think it creates perverse incentives that are harmful to society as a whole. Do you wanna pay for my expensive hobbies? - I guess your answer is "no". So why then are complaining when I am not in favor of paying for other peoples hobbies?
1
Stockton could be criticised for much with this submarine, but please leave that dumb culture war nonsense out of this. This had very little to do with this tragic event. This tragedy happened because of cost-cutting, arrogance towards risk, and such. With or without woke would this uboat have sunk and killed people on board sooner or later.
1
They have already began with people looking for them - but with submarine drones I guess
1
Russia the self-proclaimed super power - does not have any battleships lol
1
The man got a death sentence - as he was one of the five on this sub.
1
But, but, butt... the he wanted to "democratize" ocean exploration. Thats why he made it so cheap that anyone could afford it if they have 250.000 dollars. So what are you waiting for? Sell your home and you can also take a one-day trip to Titanic inside an upsized soda can with no toilet and no stupid wasteful safety measures. Regulations are just for Communists.
1
@dimdimych253 Vissa av de ryska T-55 och T-62 tanksen har upgraderats lite grann. Det är sant. Men det är också sant att många ryska T-55 och T-62 tanks har skickats ut i strid utan några som helst uppgraderingar alls. Vilket gör att jag inte alls betraktar dom som jämbördiga med M-55S. Såna här gamla fordon hör inte hemma på ett modernt slagfält. Möjligtvis att M-55S kan användas som understöds stridsvagn, men annars så tycker jag inte att vagnar äldre än så bör användas alls. Jag är mest förvånad över att så många Leopard1 fortfarande finns kvar. För på ett modernt slagfält mellan två moderna arméer har de ingen roll kvar att spela. Pansaret är för klent. Kanonen är otillräcklig mot moderna stridsvagnar. Leopard1 i Dansk tjänst gjorde förvisso bra ifrån sig på Balkan för 30 år sedan. Men det var då. T-55 var också en bra tanks på sin tid, men det var för 70 år sedan. I dag är vagnen hopplöst föråldrad. Jag tror till och med att enklare gamla pansarvärnsvapen som mest bara används mot lastbilar, pansarbilar, stridsfordon och bandvagnar kan slå ut en T-55. AT-4, MILAN, PV1110 och TOW skulle nog vara dödliga hot. För att inte tala om Carl-Gustaf, Stugna-P, Javelin, NLAW, Panzerfaust-3 osv. Detta gör att fordonet inte ens går att använda som infanteriundertöd i exempelvis en gatustrid. Det billigaste vore nog bara att ta kanontornen och flytta dom till bunkrar som försvarar stränder och flygfält. Och chassit får användas för att bygga bärgningsfordon, ingenjörsfordon, artilleripjäser, broläggare eller luftvärn.
1
The captain on the uboat was probably dead and the ship was destroyed. Imagine having an uboat of 21 square meters - and then comes almost 90.000 tons of weight (Yamato the worlds biggest battleship was 65.000 tons) slamming down on this tiny 10 ton submarine... there will be nothing left of that uboat and the people inside. As soon as a part of the submarine could not handle the extreme forces at thousands of meters down in the ocean did this sub probably started to crack somewhere. And even a tiny crack was a death sentence - as the pressure was so enormous that it would have ripped anyone inside to pieces in the fraction of a second. And the submarine will now probably looklike an empty beer can that someone has stepped on. Death was so fast that no signal for help was sent. Indeed, its possible that the men inside did not know that the sub was about to crack before it was too late. They all died in less than a second. The people on the ship at the surface did of course not know what had happened.
1
Only 1 of them were still in reproductive age, and that guy seems to have been talked into this by his dad.
1
said the internet user on youtube
1
I don't think this had to do with wokeism. It had to do with the man wanted to creating an imagine of being a new and innovative company. He wanted to be young and cool - like an Elon Musk. So he did not hire experienced submarine engineers partly because of that reason. The other reason was probably because he was a billionaire, and he is not used to not getting his will through and people disagreeing with him. And that seems to be a typical red thread throughout entire development process of this idiotic submarine. He refused to have a normal communications equipment where you can speak with the mothership. This silly person did think that this "disturbed" the pleasure of his deep dive submarine journeys so he therefore only had text messages as the only way of communicating with the mothership. His uboat did in so many ways differentiate between a normal submarine for deepwater dives, and yet he did not hire an expert in order to create a safe submarine - probably because he would come with much expensive ideas that this billionaire did not like to hear... certification for the glass window, sonar that could send out emergency signals if the uboat got stuck on the bottom, getting a hatch that could be opened from the inside, an electric system that does not come from camper vans, but have more reliability... and safe electric connections that does not only rely on an unsafe wireless connection. All those things would probably raise costs for building his little dream boat. And his favorite gadget - the big window, could very well have been the very thing that resulted in this uboat leaking in water and instantly killing everyone inside. The guy did not wanna hear expert opinions because they would protest the ways his dumb submarine was built - so therefore he rather hired clueless youngsters who would not protest too much. So this rich dude could get his will through without anyone arguing against him. He built this thing out of a thin layer of carbonfibre instead of thick wall of steel or titanium. The glued togheter his submarine. And he bought nuts and bolts from Wallmart to keep down costs. And not having any safety measures like sonar, a double pair of electric wiring and such also reduced production costs for this rich guy. But the submarine became just as crappy as he deserved.
1
This is what happens when you turn away from Jesus and start normalizing transgenderism, teach evolution in schools and allows gay marriage. This is the wrath of God almighty.
1
The only real God is Jahwe. Anal is not real
1
Well ships have life boats, they have transponders, submarines can give away pings so that other ships can know where they are so they can find them and help them. But this ship had nothing. Which I consider to be totally irresponsible. You pay 250K dollars and you cannot even get a damn transponder for your ship? And aside from that do you have to open this ship from the outside, so if this little boat lay on the surface is there still a high risk that the men inside soon will die because they cannot get out from it, as the boat can only be opened and closed from outside. This entire ship is a death trap, and the men inside it are as dumb as the construction of this little boat. They did choose to take a trip with this boat despite they knew that it was very risky. And they paid much money for it as well.
1
They always check that the electric system works just before they make a dive.
1
There are some comical stupidity in all this. But I cannot joke about it. And nor do I think any jokes are funny as the thing that recently happened is just tragic. However their death may not have been pointless. Many lessons can be learned from this. The Uboat Titan is a perfect example of how one should not build a submarine. Their deaths can therefore save many lives in the future. And not just regarding submarine construction, but also when it comes other vehicles like those for space exploration or surface ships.
1
Im happy that my country never got any ugly soviet garbage on our lands... it only creates problems, since Russians do not understand what lands is their and which is not.
1
I don't care about Russia's feelings. They can close down their embassy and leave my country. I see no value in having any relations with them. They just spread lies about my country on state tv, so why should I have any respect for Russia? Why should I care about Russia feeling upset when they behave like scum themselves? I prefer cutting all ties with Russia. Let the free world do that for the next 200 years. And this barbaric wastedump can have their annual silly parades like North Korea and be stuck in eternal poverty and backwardsness.
1