Comments by "Mycroftsbrother" (@Mycroftsbrother) on "'Debate over whether or not there was (election) fraud should occur': Sen. Paul | ABC News" video.

  1. Many people think that re-counts are the same as investigating. Without allowing for a forensic examination of the machines and the ballots, there was no investigation.
    4
  2. "The earth is flat" was a fact at one time, until someone looked into it.
    4
  3.  @mr.winkie  Until all of the facts are known, you will only have supposition based on the accepted evidence. There is no indisputable fact without perfect knowledge. An absolute fact can go unrecognized until all data are collected and analyzed and pronounced upon without bias... and even then those conclusions are subject to change over time. There have been many perceived "facts" that were overturned or modified by the discovery of more data.
    3
  4.  @eh3477  Re-counts are NOT audits. Recounting fraudulent votes proves nothing. Look closely at the votes, the machines, and the processes.... if they all check out in a fair and transparent investigation, then that will be a bigger boost to the credit of the winner.
    2
  5. Sorry dude, you're not allowed to talk about that. Move along, or you will be banned and maybe arrested.
    1