Comments by "Mycroftsbrother" (@Mycroftsbrother) on "Fox News"
channel.
-
698
-
304
-
165
-
148
-
119
-
95
-
82
-
75
-
70
-
69
-
60
-
50
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
29
-
27
-
25
-
23
-
20
-
20
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
15
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
No amendment is absolute, eh Joe? How about cruel and unusual punishment, the right to legal representation, the right against illegal search and seizure, involuntary servitude, the right of women to vote, the right to a jury trial, the right against double jeopardy, and that pesky due process clause, among many others? When is Joe going to take his hatchet to those? If you can chop into one, you can you can take a chainsaw to the rest. I thought REAL lawyers understood The Constitution.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The danger here should be clear to everyone. Weaponizing sexual accusations, along with racism and every "multi-phobe" complaint, without recollection of pertinent facts, proof, evidence, or witnesses, must not be allowed to affect a person's life, career, or family. If weaponizing unsupported accusations succeeds, any individual, at any time, can come forward for political purposes, and prevent any opponent from taking public office. That's too much power to give any person or any group.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@kobyhaigerty3157 Ah yes.... that old boogie man, "hate speech," which allows one group to censor another. By merely uttering those two words, they can subjectively control language while still feeling very virtuous. My friend, hopefully you will someday understand that if ALL speech isn't free, then there is NO free speech. BTW, re-read the First Amendment and I think you will find no exception for any kind of speech. You may hate what someone says, but that gives you no right to silence them. I hate what some people say, but I would never call for them to be silenced. And I agree with you, PEACEFUL protest is a right which I will defend, BUT RIOTS? NEVER!!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Hmmmmm....... make it possible for young, able-bodied people to live without working and we are concerned that they aren't working? If the government didn't subsidize them, they would work..... like we do/did. These days, if you don't want to work, the government will give you money, food, healthcare, and a place to live, all while calling it a "human right". The US has become a paradise for the critically unmotivated and terminally lazy. Beware though, if you don't give them the same level and quality of money, food, healthcare, and housing as people who work, they will consider themselves as "oppressed".
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Yeah, certain social movements have done everything possible to create snowflakes that are afraid to face the world outside of their bubble. So, now young people want to stay in their parent's home, with free room and board, health insurance, and have the old folks pay off student their loans. Life in the real world is tough, it always has been. Parents, teachers, and the government do young people NO FAVORS by raising them in an insulated, pampered, non-competitive, progressive society.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1