Comments by "Stephen Brookes" (@stephenbrookes7268) on "War on Words: We Publish What Woke Publishers Won't. New publisher challenges cancel culture" video.

  1. 7
  2. The Labour Party was formed by a working class man, this is indisputable. However, to say the labour movement itself was formed by the working class is a very odd claim. If we look at what caused the Labour Party to come into being; it was nothing to do with the working class. The trades' unions were the children of oppressed workers, forming guilds and associations to ensure that they were not starved, or made homeless, prior to being worked to an early death, by unregulated capitalists. The first steps towards working people having parlimentary representation was purely, pseudo egalitarianism by their oppressors. The granting of the franchise to the working class was not an act of generosity, it was an appeasment of the common folk to avert a revolution. The ideologies that brought about the rumblings of revolt, were predominantly fuelled by the upper and middle classes' cathartic desires to help those poor dears in the mills and mines, to eat and keep a roof over their heads, so that they could feel less guilty about their trust funds and silk under garments. The Fabians, the Social Democrats and The Scotish Labour Party all have their origins deep in the belly fat of upper class Tories, upper middle class academics, artists and writers. Like the Bloomsbury Group and the Pre-Rapaelites, who believed themselves to be "Radicals" and went down slumming it with the great unwashed to either virtue signal to their Suburban wannabe chums or to cock a snook to their parents and their stuffy old conservatve and liberal values. Does any of this sound familiar? The Labour Party as it stands is as detached from its roots as the spoilt greatgreatgrandson of an industrial revolutionary entrepreneur, is from the life his ancient ancestor may have been born to.
    2
  3. 1
  4. 1
  5. 1
  6. 1