Comments by "H B" (@capitalb5889) on "ABC News" channel.

  1. Trump was not misrepresented. He is trying to overturn the election.
    1
  2. And by the same reckoning, no one has ever "won" the election until the electoral college meets. But I somehow doubt you were making this same point four years ago.
    1
  3. did you count 150m ballots yourself? Of did you just suck up Trump's lies without skepticism?
    1
  4. In what sense did he "win"? Perhaps you are talking about the 2016 election. Trump definitely won that one.
    1
  5. Funny how so many Americans believe the utterances of a known liar and cheat.
    1
  6.  @joeyanderson6660  - truth is truth no matter who says it.
    1
  7. The pro-Trump bot accounts are out in force today with their pointless one line comments.
    1
  8. Trump is a disgrace to the country
    1
  9. Covered windows is not evidence of fraud. Huge numbers of dead people voting would be, however. So what is your evidence of dead people voting? As we know, every time the Trump legal team goes to court with claims of voter fraud, they are asked to provide the evidence and they can't. The cases get thrown out. So I ask you whether you have evidence that Trump's legal team are unaware of. Any evidence? Hmmm? No? Then maybe you shouldn't keep parroting known untruths.
    1
  10. Trump is a flailing idiot, yet 70m people still voted for him. The fact that people may vote for tyrants in developing countries is no reason for doing so in the USA.
    1
  11. 2000 Mules is a fantasy for people who don't understand technology, statistics and probability.
    1
  12. 🙄 hardly equivalent.
    1
  13. Yet you and Trump have no evidence for this
    1
  14. 4 and 7 are both associated with death in Japan
    1
  15. No credible evidence for fraud
    1
  16.  @MystoRobot  presumably none of those links are to "mainstream media" sources. So why would I give them any credibility? The Russian IRA will be pumping stuff like that out by the hour. If there has been any fake ballots found it would be huge news. But you are so far down the rabbit hole that you believe that this information is being suppressed by the MSM as opposed to the reality - there were no fake ballots. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2020/11/06/technology/false-dead-michigan-voter-claims.amp.html
    1
  17.  @MystoRobot  - not sure where you get your definition of indoctrination from, but it isn't the one in my dictionary. The MSM does have fact checkers in place and standards. The non-MSM has no such quality controls, and regularly bends the truth for political purposes. I looked at the Freitag video where some ballots were found in the trash. A handful. No idea when or where but you don't fix an election by dropping a few votes in the trash. And if you are trying to fix it nationwide, you do a better job. They may well have been spoiled ballot papers for all we know. Given that some were drawn all over, that sounds more probable.
    1
  18. Trump needs to go now, not on the 20th.
    1
  19. The audits conclusion was that Biden won but not all procedures were correctly followed.
    1
  20.  @garny3766  - OK. Biden won - they confirmed that.
    1
  21.  @garny3766  - you do realise that the "duplicate" ballots weren't actually counted twice? I suspect that you don't know what a "duplicate ballot" is or why they are duplicated. There was a small discrepancy between the official number of duplicates and the recounted number, but not large enough to change anything. The discrepancies discovered appear to be well within the normal range you would expect, and probably the votes were about 50:50 Biden / Trump. Anyway, was there any other damning evidence or was that your best shot?
    1
  22.  @garny3766  - no idea how hose votes went, but as far as I know, those duplicate ballots were not counted twice. There was a discrepancy in the number, but even if they were all Biden ballots (which was never revealed) it wouldn't have made any difference. Everything was perfectly within the normal boundaries of error.
    1
  23. Rubbish. No one ever suggested that Trump did not win the election - Clinton conceded straight away. People felt that he was not fit to be president, And at the end of four years we see why - a man clearly unfit for the office to which he was elected, doing everything in his power to overturn the result of a democratic election with , like some tin pot dictator.
    1
  24. Until the ruling is reversed. And it will be. Celebrate your victory and your insane interpretation of the Bible while you can.
    1
  25. "strange stuff" - such as?
    1
  26.  @robertsmith2956  how do you know that there is no outrage from pro-abortionists? That sounds like like a quite implausible assertion.
    1
  27.  @robertsmith2956  speak out about what?
    1
  28.  @robertsmith2956  what's that got to do with abortion rights activists? Have you thought this through?
    1
  29.  @robertsmith2956  you're rambling now. Views on abortion have nothing to do with unrelated issues. Whatever the case was that you referred to has nothing to with abortion - it sounded like a rape and kidnap. An awful case, but not actually relevant. And gun control is an entirely separate debate and your position on one in no way needs to determine your view on another (although likely to be correlated, I suspect).
    1
  30. I see. And what is the evidence for Trump's wild accusations of fraud? Zero.
    1
  31. The result wasn't watched by the rest of the world - it is just an obscure story in the "World" news section.
    1
  32.  @brienfoaboutanything9037  you tricked me into clicking on the link!
    1
  33.  @LulaMae21  this has gone unreported in the rest of the world
    1
  34. What's murder got to do with it? That's a completely different issue. Stay on topic.
    1
  35.  @justgettingtothetruth8290  - man, get a fucking spell checker
    1
  36.  jack sparrow  - there are plenty who are actually religious. It is not my place to say who is "godly", but Trump must certainly isn't. I always thought it would be hard for anyone to be elected President who want a practicing Christian, yet ironically it is one who appears to be non-religious who gains the greatest backing from the evangelical wackos
    1
  37. I think it's because Biden clearly won the election.
    1
  38.  @dohnpeezy1881  - we have no reason to believe it was anything but legal.
    1
  39.  @dohnpeezy1881  - I will go to any news service that presents evidenced-based news.
    1
  40.  @dohnpeezy1881  - the thousands of dead people voting has been fully explained (because it isn't true). https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-us-2020-54874120 This is what happens when people who are not qualified to undertake proper research but who are looking desperately for something see the pattern that they are seeking. And the people reading the story are too willing to believe it because they want it to be true too. Then there is the story about some county where more more ballots than registered voters were received and yet people always neglect to name three useful bits of information (the name of the county, the number of ballots and the number of registered voters). I don't know about what happened in Antrim county, but I imagine that it was the correction of a clerical input error - the sort of thing that happens occasionally when you have a huge operation like a nationwide ballot.
    1
  41. The truth hurts, huh?
    1
  42.  @richardr788  - yeah. I'm shitting my pants. Given that Biden is so centrist that it is unlikely. If Sanders had won, then you could make that claim, but Biden is far to the right of Sanders.
    1
  43. LOL
    1
  44. Joe does need any moves - he just needs to be sworn in. The one without moves is Trump. I think you know that as you look like a bot account anyway
    1
  45. My biggest takeaway from this is that the MAGA crew will hang on to anything that gives them hope, even when a partisan audit concludes that the result was correct.
    1
  46.  @craigfuhr  Clinton conceded the day after the election and has never tried to over-turn the result.
    1
  47.  @foodlifefamily6140  - the President is a joke and a majority of the electorate know it, along with the rest of the world.
    1
  48.  W T F ?  - no - it is pretty obvious. The initial count requires the initial collation and sorting of the ballots, including the mail-in ballots, which is extremely time-consuming. However, once that has been done, the actual counting bit is pretty quick as all the votes are already sorted into the candidate piles and it is more about counting the number of ballots and pulling out those which ended up in the wrong pile.
    1
  49.  W T F ?  - given that there was no evidence of any fraud taking place the first time around, I don't see why this is an issue. I also presume that Democratic Observers were also not allowed to clarify the authenticity of the original ballots etc. In most developed democracies, there is not even the concept of party political observers, it is just a bureaucratic process. Trump is the first major politician in any developed country to have ever called an election fraudulent, and he has done so without evidence.
    1
  50.  W T F ?  - I have, but it is clearly speculative and unevidenced nonsense.
    1