Comments by "Dragon F" (@dragonf1092) on "CNBC Television"
channel.
-
3
-
2
-
No state shall convert a liberty into a license, and charge a fee therefore. Murdock V. Pennsylvania,319 US 105.
If the state converts a right (liberty) into a privilege, the citizen can ignore the license and fee and engage in the right (liberty) with impunity. Shuttles worth V. City of Birmingham Alabama,373 US. 262.
The claim and exercise of a constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime. Miller V. US 230 F.2d. 486,489.
Where rights secured by the constitution are involved, there can be no rulemaking or legislation which would abrogate them. Miranda V. Arizona,384 US 436 p.491.
All laws which are repugnant to the constitution are null and void. Marbury V. Madison,5 US (2nd Branch)137,174,176(1803).
Equal protection under the law, and supremacy clause.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Supreme Court " the general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void and ineffective for any purpose since it's unconstitutionality dates from the time of it's enactment... In legal contemplation it is as inoperative as if it had never been passed... Since an unconstitutional law is void the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no right, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection and justifies no acts performed under it. A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supercede any existing law. Indeed insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land (the constitution)it is superceded thereby. No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it." Bonett V. Vallier, 16 NW. 885,136 Wis. 193(1908); Norton V. Shelby county,118 US 425(1886).
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1