Comments by "" (@tekannon7803) on "Lex Clips"
channel.
-
258
-
107
-
56
-
56
-
55
-
50
-
Lex, this is turning out to be one of your best interviews because you are bringing out the quality discussion Professor Peterson is capable of but rarely achieves in many interviews. It is incredible to hear Jordan Peterson pointing out that the left is doing so much to make his life miserable. I am confused; what happened to the left? The 60s revolution was all about letting people follow their hearts and to let others live free. To hear that the left has morphed into this beast that is suddenly attacking intellectuals with or without provocative ideas makes me sad, because somehow, somewhere people took a detour and ended up being worse than what the people who started left-leaning society in the first place were all about. I have heard Jordan Petersen say things that I might not agree with, but I could not imagine saying anything more than that. "Hey, I disagree with you on this subject Jordon." End of story. But no, Jordan is telling us people are so upset because of what he believes in that they are attacking him through the courts, interrupting his way of life, and even altering his professional life. This is wrong. What in the world is going on? I'll tell you what I think and you may or may not agree, but I think a lot of these people have whittled down the activities they do in their life to a minimum and suddenly when they see someone they disagree with, they make it their mission in life to silence the voices that say things they have long ago put out of their minds because it goes against what they think. They do everything in their power to shut a person down who has another visison on a topic. In the past, people on the left put people with conflicting ideas about how to live life on dedestals: think Johh Lennon, Mick Jagger, Leonard Cohen. I see people around me all the time who want to shut me down. You know who it is? It's the people who sit around all day and do nothing but smoke on their balconies or walk around the park to kill time. These are the critics who are complaining about anything they don't like. They're living in some prison in their minds.
39
-
30
-
24
-
22
-
Professor Frenkel gives us another view of the inescapable paradox we find ourselves fighting with and marveling at all of our lives. In a sense, once we first get an inkling of what time is, from that moment on, everything becomes goalposts that we must kick the ball through to get through another minute, hour, day or month and especially, a year. We see the trace of time on our faces as photos in a drawer that were forgotten, suddenly cause us to pause and hold our breath in seeing what we looked like all those years ago. It is always unkind to us as it steals our youth, robs our beauty, dulls our minds and finally kills us off with toxins that find the weakest organ of choice and transform our bodies back to dust. Time is our master, but we master time as well...
21
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
17
-
16
-
If Lex and Vitalik could please watch the Valuetainment videocast with Craig Wright and you still do not come out convinced he is the creator of Bitcoin, then he's got a date with the Academy Awards in America. Not only does he come off as the guy who invented it, but he's got the lingo. And what does he stand to gain by pretending he's the originator of Bitcoin? Lastly, do you think for one minute if Craig Wright is not the creator of Bitcoin, then wouldn't the real inventor poke his head out, or give us an undeniable sign? I don't know why this keeps going on, but please, Lex and Vitalik, why don't you invite Craig Wright on Lex's show and have Vitalik there too. Both of you could question him. Lex is a master of quality fact-getting questions, if Wright has pulled the wool over the eyes of the global population, then Lex Fridman is the man who can get him to cough up. Double that if Vitalik is along for the ride. Come on guys, get this one solved for us, would ya?
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
Lex and Randall, it is a pleasure to hear about race theory and listening in from across the world from you, I think what we have to realize is that you and I, and by that I mean, you, Lex, you, Randall, and I, all think differently! The only time I get into trouble is when I think things like, "Well, Lex would probably think this way or Randall would probably think of me like this if I said that." What am I saying? Are we not going too deep on racism or sexual orientation of people by delving into what each one of us believes about it? The thing is we are all prejudice towards certain people or ways of thinking and what I am trying to say is that we have just got to turn the page and realize that we all think in certain way and try as hard as we can not to harbor negative thoughts about anybody. I know; I know, it's too simplistic! But if we can just take down from the podium a lot of these issues that get people worked up and try to put out a message like, "Hey, we are all different and we all have bad days and above all we are human, but let's just try to put our negative thoughts on anybody out of our minds."
14
-
14
-
14
-
12
-
The thing we must never forget is that from the beginning humans have done everything. The frozen man they found in the Alps that was ambushed 5,000 years ago was found to have everything necessary to get him through the day and night. His knife was hand made and as sharp as a razor. Machines, AI, chips in our brains and the like will indeed enhance our existence, but we must never forget that when humans do something, there is that hand-made touch that is so elegant because it's imperfect. Machines are going to homogonize us to where everything will look like an alogrithym was consulted before making it. We cannnot stop the march of time, but when we see that people are more than willing to let machines do everything they can do and better, it might be a time to consider raising our children without high technology until the age of, say, 15 years old. This way the kids would have to learn to draw, paint a picture, change a tire, etcetera without anything like a robot or AI assisting them. We must not bury our natural abilities.
12
-
12
-
11
-
Randall, it is very interesting to hearing you and Lex talk, because you obviously know your subject inside and out, and Lex has become a master interviewer. What I think is very, very delicate is to go back in the heads of, say, Jefferson, Lincoln, Alexis de Tocqueville. Not because you have got it wrong in what they wrote---because they probably knew they couldn't say what they truly felt, so they adlibbed a bit. Look at it this way: less than 1% of artifacts of antiquity have survived to the present day. We try to get our heads around what Socrates thought and said and Plato and Roman Emperors and some writings have survived, but can we honestly analyze them as people correctly after centuries of time have passed? Can we honestly come up with Thomas Jefferson's actual motives and mindset with more than 2 centuries having passed? What I think we tend to forget is that there were not modern-day conveniences back in Lincoln's day and life must have had a grit and charm to it in his day that no matter how we try, we will always come up with turning Lincoln's own words to mean things that I am convinced in his time meant slightly different things. If I were President of The United States, my way of solving the race problem would probably go this way. I would say to people that everyone has to try to not think bad things of other people and when they do to try and say to yourself to avoid thinking that way. That's the end of the race problem in my mind. If people get to know themselves a little better and start to realize that when they begin to think negative things of whomever it is they find themselves in conflict with, I think the only thing we can tell them and keep telling them is to try their darndest not to let yourself think that way about other people. Now this is never ending, because every day you wake up you've got a mind garden full of weeds to pull, but it just may be the way to turn the page on the current way of looking at the problem...
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
Jocko's information about Hitler listening to his generals conflicts with several sources I have listened to. Hitler overrode his generals every step of the way and in some ways it worked out well, like invading France. But in operation Barbarosa for example, the Wehrmacht was 30 kilometers from Moscow and could have seized it easily. Hitler didn't listen to his generals and ordered them to clean up resistence that was behind the German lines. This gave Stalin time to dig in and fortify positions and bring in new troops, equipment and supplies. When the Germans had cleaned up the resistence they found two lines of defense around Moscow and because the Russian winter set in, they were never able to take their prize. Equally, Hitler refused to supply his soldiers with winter clothes--again not listening to his military chiefs--and the German soldiers suffered terribly trying to fight in the bitterly cold Russian winter. I do believe however, if General Paulus had listened to Hitler and not surrendered in Stalingrad, they could have pushed through. Paulus disobeyed direct orders and 100,000 men went off to the gullag. 95,000 troops succombed to the freezing cold weather, disease, lack of food and internment in the work camps. Stallin on the other hand let his generals call the shots all through the war, and they of course were the victors. But the truth is that there are a lot of military analysts and no one really knows all the details.
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
Lex Fridman has shown once again his uncanny ability to bring out the best in his guests, and Jared Kushner delivers some very strong arguments about how to achieve peace in the middle east. I do not have any geopolitical credentials; in fact, I do not even have a background in international affairs---I am an artist---so please bear with me in what I am about to say. What I believe is that I have a workable, long-term resolution to the Israel-Palestinian conflict that will benefit Israelis, Palestinians and the world writ large. Jared has said that he believes it is possible to have peace by various means, but he does not see the need for Gaza to be evacuated; I do. Today, war between Israel and Hamas will possibly be unleashed like never seen before and suffering and death and increased hatred between two great nations that we all know will only grow. In short; we know how this movie begins but we can only guess how it ends. But I have a peace plan. It is not going to please everyone. Here goes: Gaza must be evacuated and Palestinians relocated. Every building, structure, road and infrastructure should be bulldozed into the ground and the 145 square kilometer land area that Gaza has been should be made into a sort of Galapagos of the middle east and serve as a nature reserve for endangered species of animal, fish, plant, bird etc., on the planet. This area which is about the size of the Isle of Wight could be transformed into a nature reserve where Palestinians and Israelis could eventually work side by side in saving species from extinction and be a gift to our childrens' children as how we resolved this terrible conflict. Just let this roll around in your mind and what you will find coming into your thoughts are pleasant images instead of tragic ones. Lex, Jared in all due respect, I know this peace plan means for us to be cruel to be kind, but the Gaza strip is turning Palestinians into eternal prisoners of the human community because of the inhumane open sewer of living conditions it offers. Palestinian children are being psychologically damaged, the great Palestinian people need one patch of land to live on, and there are countries around the world who have a need for workers. China has whole cities with apartment buildings of millions of apartments empty, for example. We could at least ask them to help out in taking Palestinians leaving Gaza, same for asking Jordan for more land for the Palestinians. It may be a little early to be offering a peace plan, but what I am offering is something good to replace something very bad and it is doable. This is a holy site and what could be more appropriate for the peace plan than to make Gaza a sanctuary for every species on earth bordering on extinction? It is doable.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
Thank you Mr Fridman and Mr Pompliano for your great questions Lex and for your excellent answers Mr Pompliano and bpth of your thought-provoking ideas in this excellent videocast. Every time I tune in to Lex’s interviews, I keep saying to myself “okay, okay, I’ll just watch for a while, cos I got to get back to doing nothing asap.” The problem is there is no dead-space in a Lex Fridman interview, and you guys are no exception. The world is going to need a Bitcoin Pope and I recommend Lex… Just kidding. But let’s have a look at what one of the giants in finance has to say about the mythical Bitcoin. Here is what Nouriel Roubini has to say and if you’ve got a bottle of whiskey in the room, I’d recommend you pour yourself a tall drink. Here goes: “You have to ask yourself if it’s an asset, it’s not even a currency or an asset, usually, stocks, bonds, loans, real estate give you some income, dividends, coupon, interest or rent. Some assets like residential real estate give you huge housing services. Gold doesn’t have an income but there is industrial use, utility as jewelry, and as a past monetary use and as a store of value. Bitcoin doesn’t have any income, doesn’t have a use, doesn’t have any utility. It is a pure speculating, self-fulfilling bubble on a price appreciation. It doesn’t have a feature of an asset, or a currency, it’s just a self-fulfilling bubble. It’s intrinsic value is zero, and it needs more energy than it takes to power Argentina for it to work. If you added pure carbon tax, the value would be negative not even zero. There have been articles of pump and dump schemes, we know that tether issuance is a billion dollars every other day. Tether and BTNX?is being used to by bitcoin and it’s not backed by anything. There is a bunch of wash-trading, or spoofing. Bitcoin uses the energy of a country the size of Argentina. Instead of having a few institutions validating transactions, 70% of all the mining of Bitcoin is being done by 5 or 6 firms based in Russia, Belaruse and China. To rely on countries with no rule of law to verify transactions, there is centralization of mining, of exchanges with 99% of all that’s occurring, of developers, of whales. The genial condition of Bitcoin is worse that North Korea, where Kim Un Jung and his cronies owned an entire country. It’s a lie that it’s a decentralized system. It’s centralized where a bunch of insiders and whales, and others are controlling the entire system and manipulating it in states where there is no rule of law." To recap:
1. A lot of manipulation
2. Pump and dump schemes
3. Spoofing
4. Wash trading
5. Front running
6. Issuance by tether or a fiat currency not backed by much that is used to manipulate the price of Bitcoin
7. It’s a bubble
8. Bitcoin is not a currency
9. It is not a unit of account
10. It is not a scalable means of payment
11. It is not a stable store of value, not even Bitcoin conferences accept it as a means of payment because the price volatility implies your profit margin can be wiped out
12. Calling them crypto-currencies is a misnomer, they’re not even assets
13. Transaction costs of Bitcoin preclude its use, they are much higher than normal currency
14. The technology, proof of work, doesn’t allow more than 5 transactions per second for Bitcoin, Visa, for example, has 24,000 transactions per second
15. It’s not going to be used as a scalable means of payment---ever
16. It’s never going to be used for goods and services or across borders, because there is no way that bitcoin will be allowed to transfer large amounts of money because kyc and mel,
17. It will be used for speculation and buying other crypto-currencies
18. It’s a self-serving system
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
The biggest question I'd like to see answered about how life began came to me when I watched and listened to a videocast by Professor Jim Tour of Rice University. He said that the membrane of the simplest living cell had 10 to the 78 billion possibilities and only one combination could work. He said the carbohydrates on top of the membrane were more complex than the RNA and DNA combined. Boys and girls, when you add in to the equation that all the parts of the cell have to be combined at just the right moment and just the right temperature for the cell to come alive, you can no longer buy the idea of the primordial soup and all of the things necessary for the cell to function happening in one shot by chance. Of course, we'll never know. But the incredible complexity of a single cell--when one part of the cell wants to send material to another part of the cell it builds a suspended bridge, sends over the material, and then the bridge dissolves---there is no way that single cell happened in a muddy pond somewhere and life began. I'm not a scientist, but after hearing Jim Tour's lecture, I could no longer believe what I learned from science classes in school. The thing is, even if life emerged somewhere else in the universe, the absolutely phenomenal complexity of just one little bitty cell is beyond our mind's ability to understand. Whatever happened for the first cell to begin and then the branching off and mutating and forming plants, animals etc., is something we can only ponder on but probably never find the origin of. But I hope I'm wrong; I hope they do find the answer, because I have been in complete awe of what life is since I listened to Jim Tour's lecture.
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
Dear Mr Fridman and Mr Tedrake, Thank you Mr Fridman for showcasing some of the most talented people in the world. You are not only one of the most influential people in the world, you are doing it to make the world a better place and I think I speak for a lot of people when I say that we are all better off and more informed since you began doing videocasts. For the robotic fantasies people have, I think that we have to realize that people are afraid of rogue robots malfunctioning because of artificially enhanced intelligence systems that go berserk, because our sixth sense is way ahead of anything our minds can see coming this way. The sixth sense is buried so far in most people’s consciousness that they aren’t even aware they’re tuning in, whereas others who have been fortunate enough to flick on the on switch at some point in their lives can actually use it like a tool. I’m speaking for men though, because I think women have a better relationship with their inner voice or intuition than men do. Therefore, if we look at all of the other things people believed would someday happen, we can see that there is a correlation between imagining things and the things actually happening, like going in space. Today we have people who believe we will be able to travel at light-speed, and to travel through time, or become cyborgs. For myself, I think it’s because, in our minds, our sixth senses can see that these things are real and that they’re coming someday soon to a planet like ours. Be well -
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
I'd like to share a technique for what I think depression consists of and I of course don't include clinical depression or people who have severe depression. What I have found is that feeling depressed is because of thoughts. The thoughts are themselves depressing because they are always about one's failures or self-criticism and the thing about the mind, or for my mind, is that if I say to myself "next thought please", the thought that was troubling me disappears. It often comes back, but sometimes I get many moments of a blank or empty space with nothing. Sure enough, the bad thought or another one will come back, but by saying "next thought please", the mind will cancel it out for you and it allows one to at least time to get away from a troublesome pattern or type of thought that brings you down. Like a lot of things, I can't say if this is really a way to get out of feeling depressed, but what I like is that it gives you precious moments where you can have silence and sort of recover from whatever it was that was bothering you. At any rate, it's a win/win type of thing because at least one is trying to get a handle on one's negative thoughts. I also think that what these obsessive thought patterns are that bring people down show is that they have a built-in obsessive-thinking psychology. So; why not use it to one's advantage? Another thing I try to do if I'm stuck in one of those times is to use my mind's obsession to solve other problems in my work. I say to myself, okay, let's get obsessive about finding a way to solve this problem I have at work. In other words, use the thought patterns one has to be used to help one solve seemingly intractable problems in one's work or social life.
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
Thank you Lex for another incredible interview with a visionary of our times. I'm an artist and inventor so the thing I am going to say does not come from my background. Brian said 'how do we terraform a planet." I know this is going to sound wild, but hasn't the Earth been terraformed? When you see a moon overhead that is the only reason for life being possible on the Earth and this moon being exactly 220,000 times smaller than the sun and exactly 220,000 times closer to the sun than the Earth and being a nearly perfectly sphere with a tidal orbit giving it about 12 rotations a year and giving us perfect solar eclipses, one has to look at it scientifically. Our civilization kick-started some 5 or more thousand years ago and un until then no one had even come up with the idea for a comb. Then cities, laws, schools, medicine, weaponry, structures came to be with precision that we cannot match today in many cases. There is something unusual about the human race having perfect races of black, white, red and yellow people that defies a natural evolutionary approach---again, only in my unschooled opinion. I believe the moon was terraformed and probably looked like phobos of mars. It was made to be a sphere, used as a pendulum to give us a perfect 24 hour day--another incredibly odd number so exact---and made with a tidal-moon---the only known tidal moon in the universe and its size is unusually large. You guys know best, I'm only throwing out ideas.
3
-
3
-
3
-
John Mearsheimer adds a fascinating and knowledgeable voice to world affairs and once again, Lex Fridman delivers a 5-star interview. As far as Russia's invasion of WW II, what I have gleaned from my resources is that Stalin never went against what his generals decided, he took their advice. However, he constantly created antagonism among them, but he listened to them. From what I read, Hitler would patiently listen for 2 hours for example, as his top general would explain the best strategy for a particular operation and Hitler would then disagree. He would always go against what his generals would say. When the Russians were only 30 kilometers from Moscow and easily within reach of taking over the capital, the top tank commander radioed a message to Hitler that they were ready and could take Moscow in days and win the war if we go into Moscow right now. Predicatably, Hitler refused to allow the troops to go in now and ordered them to clean up the patches of Russian units that were scattered around behind the German forces. This is where disobeying orders could have saved the day. This gave the Russians 3 months to build up counter-defenses and The Battle of Kursk was the result. The only time in the war that Hitler was actually right in his decision was when he ordered General Paulus of the 4th and 6th armies not to surrender at Stalingrad when they were surrounded, Paulus disobeyed and surrendered with 100,000 troops. After the war, only 5,000 German soldiers were left alive who returned to Germany.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@FuriousImp GGGGGGGGGGreat to hear from you and the best thing I could ever want to happen is I am completely wrong. I have an open mind and try to stay neutral and thankfully there are people like you giving us information to make sense out of extraordinary occurances. I gather facts and when for example every one I have talked with claims The Great Pyramid of Giza was Koufu's tomb, I look at the facts I've gathered and say I think it was something else. Why would a tomb need expansion joints?1. It is 3/60th of a single degree of true north
2. It weighs 6 million tons
3. Its footprint is 13 acres
4. It’s more than 755.9 feet along each side
5. It’s 480.6 feet high
6. It has more than 2.3 million individual blocks of stone
7. It is locked into the Cardinal dimensions of our planet
9. The dimensions of our planet are incorporated into its dimensions
10. If you take the height and multiply it by 43,200 you get the polar radius of the Earth
11. If you measure the base perimeter of the pyramid accurately and multiply that measurement by 43,200 you get the equatorial circumference of the Earth
12. The scale is not random, the number 43,200 is derived from a key motion of the Earth, which is called the precession of the Earth’s axis
13. The Earth wobbles on its axis very slowly at the rate of 1 degree every 72 years; 43,200 is a multiple of 72; 600 X 72
15. So; they’ve given us the dimensions of the planet in The Great Pyramid of Giza on a scale defined by the planet itself
16. There are 70-ton blocks of stone raised 300 feet above the ground
17. It has eight sides, and at the spring equinox and the autumn equinox one side of the pyramid is in the shade in the morning and again in the late afternoon
18. It’s a calendar
19. It has expansion joints
20. It is located at the exact intersection of the longest line of latitude and the longest line of longitude of the Earth, in other words The Great Pyramid is located at the precise center of the Earth’s land mass.
21. The builders possessed highly sophisticated knowledge of mathematics and geometry
22. The builders had knowledge of the true dimensions of the Earth to extreme precision
23. The builders possessed exceptionally advanced technical instrumentation to site The Great Pyramid
24. Pi = C over D Phi = Divided by 5 + 1 over 2. Archimedes discovered Pi about 250 BC, but Egyptians knew of it 2,250 years earlier
25. The Great Pyramid is 146.75 m high, its height X a million equals the distance from the Earth to the sun
26. If you subtract the inner circle from the outer circle of the circumference of The Great Pyramid you get the speed of light in meters
27. The weight of The Great Pyramid is 5,273, 000 tons and that multiplied by a billion is the weight of the Earth
28. If you divide the perimeter of The Great Pyramid by ½ its height, the result is 3.14 = Pi
2
-
@FuriousImp GRRRRRRRRRReat to hear from you. I think my editor would agree with you. In a month or my book will be available. It's another outrageous idea for an economic system to replace capitalism. I'm not an economist so I know in advance I'm going to getting a lot of comments similar to yours! It's my evaluation of an economic system that I think has run its course. I look at things and try to come up with solutions. A friend who is an archaeologist becomes angry with alternative ideas. He believes The Great Pyramid of Giza was Khoufu's tomb. Here's what I've come up with: 1. It is 3/60th of a single degree of true north
2. It weighs 6 million tons
3. Its footprint is 13 acres
4. It’s more than 755.9 feet along each side
5. It’s 480.6 feet high
6. It has more than 2.3 million individual blocks of stone
7. It is locked into the Cardinal dimensions of our planet
9. The dimensions of our planet are incorporated into its dimensions
10. If you take the height and multiply it by 43,200 you get the polar radius of the Earth
11. If you measure the base perimeter of the pyramid accurately and multiply that measurement by 43,200 you get the equatorial circumference of the Earth
12. The scale is not random, the number 43,200 is derived from a key motion of the Earth, which is called the precession of the Earth’s axis
13. The Earth wobbles on its axis very slowly at the rate of 1 degree every 72 years; 43,200 is a multiple of 72; 600 X 72
15. So; they’ve given us the dimensions of the planet in The Great Pyramid of Giza on a scale defined by the planet itself
16. There are 70-ton blocks of stone raised 300 feet above the ground
17. It has eight sides, and at the spring equinox and the autumn equinox one side of the pyramid is in the shade in the morning and again in the late afternoon
18. It’s a calendar
19. It has expansion joints
20. It is located at the exact intersection of the longest line of latitude and the longest line of longitude of the Earth, in other words The Great Pyramid is located at the precise center of the Earth’s land mass.
21. The builders possessed highly sophisticated knowledge of mathematics and geometry
22. The builders had knowledge of the true dimensions of the Earth to extreme precision
23. The builders possessed exceptionally advanced technical instrumentation to site The Great Pyramid
24. Pi = C over D Phi = Divided by 5 + 1 over 2. Archimedes discovered Pi about 250 BC, but Egyptians knew of it 2,250 years earlier
25. The Great Pyramid is 146.75 m high, its height X a million equals the distance from the Earth to the sun
26. If you subtract the inner circle from the outer circle of the circumference of The Great Pyramid you get the speed of light in meters: the speed of light!
27. The weight of The Great Pyramid is 5,273, 000 tons and that multiplied by a billion is the weight of the Earth
28. If you divide the perimeter of The Great Pyramid by ½ its height, the result is 3.14 = Pi
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Happy New Year Mr Fridman and Ms Pasulka, May we wish you and your families and friends and colleagues a very good new year! Stan Friedman, a nuclear physicist and UFO researcher, conducted a thorough background check on Bob Lazar. He contacted MIT and other places of higher learning Mr Lazar said he attended; MIT, for example, said they never heard of him. When questioned about it, Mr Lazar said he had a masters degree or some degree from MIT, but that the CIA had had his record wiped. That's when I stopped being a fan of Bob Lazar, because that's not a credible response. Why would he say something that isn't true and expect us to believe another story that no one in the world could possibly verify? Stan also found Bob Lazar’s old high school and found out that he graduated in the lower third of his high school class. That's not scientist material. To his credit, Mr Lazar has never varied in his story; but until he fesses up to fudging his university credentials, his credibility rests in doubt. It would be the same if we found out if Lex never went to university. Suddenly, everything he had ever said would be hard to believe. Everyone, I mean, everyone, went for Mr Lazar's story: it's something everyone wants to believe in. But once someone lies about where he went to university and we find out he was not very bright in high school, we have to ask ourselves, what scientific department or government agency would hire a person like that to reverse engineer technology that spaceships from other galaxies are made of. It defies logic.
2
-
In all due respect to the physicist Max Tegmark and soon-to-be legendary (In 50 years?) Lex Fridman. Fridman will have interviewed 100,000 people by 2073 and should enter the videocast hall of fame if he's lucky! I am an armchair comedian whose jokes seem to never go very far. Some humor before a somber statement. We cannot stop developing AI for any amount of time, because one of your adversaries would only pick up reigns and ride off with improving on what exists now. Long ago in a place far, far away, a future farmer found a wolf cub, brought it home to his shocked wife, and said we're going to make this little guy into a family dog who will love us and not eat us. The story ends there as the family was never heard from again. I am sorry for the rambling on. What am I saying here? We have nothing to fear about AI because no matter how intelligent a robotic system is, it must never be more to us than the family dog. If anyone has seen 'The Servant', Dirk Bogarde’s film noir masterpiece about a servant taking over the estate by slowly breaking down the master, you know what I mean when I say we can have AI that cures cancer, but that same system must heel, must obey humans at every time and nothing short of that. Of course, it will take time to find out how to make a sentient being out of these machines if they are not already developing some sort of consciousness, but we must not look at AI as anything more than fire when it was invented. We came up with firemen. We need to calibrate these marvels of technology to do whatever they will be able to do, but at the end of all development, they must come home and be nothing more than the family dog. It is an opinion...
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Lex and David, you have probably been asked this question a lot of times, but I would like to know if you think the moon landing with Neil Armstrong really took place on the moon? Every man---I can only speak for myself of course---but every man with the little boy he once was still alive and well inside of him wants more than anything to believe Armstrong really was the first man to step on the moon's surface. But there are things that don't add up. Why did the director of NASA resign 3 days before the alleged moon landing? Why did Armstrong go out and test the moon lander 24 hours before the launch and nearly lose his life ejecting from the out-of-control lunar lander? Was he really trying to show us the thing was a sham? Why was the television the only place news networks could get feed and film the event from? Why did Buzz Aldrin take only one (1) photo of Armstrong on the moon? Wouldn't NASA have made it a priority for historical reasons and future funding to get dozens of pictures of Armstrong on the moon? Why did Armstrong never talk in the first person singular about the moon landing. If you listen to Peter Hyatt's analysis, Peter and his wife who is also a police word analyst could not believe Armstrong never said things like. "When I walked on the moon, I didn't see any stars" instead, Armstrong would say "We never saw stars from the moon's surface". 3rd person singular doesn't describe a personal experience. Why is Armstrong’s telephone communication with HOUSTON crystal clear when coming in for the lunar landing? The astronauts were literally sitting on a 10,000-pound thrust engine that had decibels of 120 to 150, yet we hear a sewing machine sound in the background. Lastly, there were no craters from the 10,000-pound thrust engines. Not even a pebble on the landers. There are footprints under the lander in some pictures. Rocetdine's (please check spelling) ---the industrial company that made the thrusters---main worry was that the landers would blow a hole so deep in the lunar soil that the craft would fall in... There is much, much more.
2
-
2
-
The question Mr Fridman is posing to Mr Buterin will follow us to the grave---pun intended. Let's first imagine what living to, say, 500 years will mean. This will be a world of multi-parents. Kids will have a dad and a mom and then when they're old enough to leave home, dad will become a grand dad and mom will be grand ma and then dad will be a great grand dad and so on. We'll be interacting with generations of our offspring. We'll be sharpening our skills to phenonmenal levels. We'll be solving problems that could take a century or more to fully understand. Disease will be anaylzed to the point of being able to counter any side effect of any known pathogen. Criminals will be given life sentences, but put in hybernation sleep because the cost would be off-the-charts. It costs, say, 100,000 USD to house one prisoner for a year. If someone gets a hundred years, the cost to society would be enormous. And could we send someone up the river for 400 years, for example? What would a crime like murder be judged for in terms of time behind bars? Mostly though, I think the family structure would morph into everyone being from the human family, which might not be so bad when you think of it. Imagine if you were divorced 17 times and kept dreaming about your ex's every night because of alimony payments! What about friends; forget face book, you would need an separate app just to log into and to help remember all your friends and acquaintances. "Hey dude, wasn't it Jeff? Wo-ah, hey man... it's been what... 250 years since----" Imagine doing the things you love to do for centuries!
2
-
You guys are friends in a lot of people's homes and I don't know about other people, but after hearing you do your excellent and thought-provoking work in interviewing people and giving your own views, it sort of feels like you are virtual friends. You think you know someone, but you never really know anyone, but it's still fun to think so. It must be great to be interviewed by both of you---although I hate to say that I'd be a just little over both of your heads----Just kidding!!!! It's late and hey---happy 4th of July. I'm happy because I just won a custom Gibson starburst guitar!!!! Yes on July 4th!!! What Trump really represents is the the American underdog times more than a few million. Trump is successful because he is charismatic, he somehow fits the way the media works, his face loves the screen or vice versa, his words are all chopped up and don't make much sense and he tells oddles of lies, but that doesn't phase someone who has felt he or she doesn't count anymore in a country where money talks and the more you have the more people listen and the less you have the moe people don't even care if you exist or not. What am I saying? I'm saying Trump is high-fiving it with delusioned people who have played chess with capitalism and it's come up checkmate just one too many times. Your President Biden may have a lot of kilometers on the bio-machine, but he's doing a great job---and he has almost single-handedly saved the Ukraine from immediate capitulation. Joe Biden isn't going to run in 2024, but you've got to realize that if he even hinted that he was only hanging in there for one term, he'd lose credibility. Trump's political obituary is the written on the wall; he sees it but doesn't really see it everytime he gets up in the morning because like Leonardo Da Vinci said: 'There are three types of people: people who see, people who see when they are shown and people who don't see. Take your pick for Trump. America is great because you two guys can say just about anything you want and no one is coming to take you away the next day. Believe in your President Joe; stay open minded about Russia's future Lex.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Lex Fridman and Sam Harris are two giants in the world of thought and what great thinkers, like these two men are, but let's be real. Sam is trying to throw a life-raft to Jordan, his friend, and a great thinker in his own right, but Peterson's downfall is in clinging to the most famous person in the world who never existed. Jesus Christ was a bronze age imaginatory figure concocted by some pretty ingenious albeit faceless, people from that era. But Jesus was a bronze-age man because of one thing: when asked why his disciples didn't wash their hands, Jesus Christ said---and I am paraphrasing---they are clean within. If Jesus was truly the son of God he would have known about how important cleanliness was. Instead, we see bronze-age awareness coming from the son of the all-knowing God. If Jesus really was divine, he would have told people not to drink from the village well and to wash their hands and cleanse themselves every day. But no; we have had to wait 1900 years until bacteria were discovered. Jordan Peterson, like Sam Harris and Lex Fridman are a gift to the human family, but they have their flaws. It is up to everyone to do their proper research, and come to one's own conclusions. For myself, Jesus Christ was an invented figure who has been placed in a historical setting. Unfortunately, the mindset of the human family is flawed in it abitlity to see that we are the masters of our destiny, not some mythical figure that has no historical background.
1
-
1
-
Lex Fridman and David Pakman, both of you are doing a great service to America and the world---and I hope Lex's videocasts are broadcast in Russia too; it's Lex's home country. Lex has brought so many minds up front and center and David has been instrumental in helping people distinguish the truth from the hype. I think your discussion about Twitter is important because Mr Musk should not own it. It's only an opinion, but from across the world from you it looks like Elon has bought himself a personal megaphone in Twitter and tweets and somehow it looks like overkill; it looks like a mega-billionaire who has his hand in everything; he is everywhere on the American game board; he's the goalie on both teams; he can now send rockets to mars; he can build fantastic cars, but to own Twitter is going too far because the social media post that everyone used to like for its quirkiness has now Elon changing this and changing that and could it be that discreetly, ever so discreetly, he is molding the American mindset into his (autocratic?) vision of the world? This is what I think is happening and as much as I admire Elon for his contribution to society, I do not like him owning mind space. it does not bode well for the general public and especially young people for one person to be so omnipresent. It's like one size fits all only it's one person's personal touch on how people communicate, travel to work, travel in space etc. Diversity is dying in America because the system cranks out billionaires who write the rules for all of us to follow. Elon is not to blame; he's a shining example of how capitalism is supposed to work, but he is also a product of a toxic economic system that is really feudalism on steroids. I write too much, but does anything I say make sense? Is it alright for you guys that Elon has now made his brand and his empire into what could be metaphorically called wall to wall carpeting covering what some people might consider too many aspects of American society?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Thank you Mr Fridman and Mr Weinstein for honest, intellectual exchange that at times is riveting. One of Russia’s greatest gifts to Humanity and your country is Lex Fridman. Doesn’t he ever run out of questions? JUST KIDDING Lex! The UFO phenomenon is mind-boggling. Apparently, ever 6 minutes somewhere around the world, a UFO has been spotted. I’ve never seen one; my standard argument is that if the Earth sent a spaceship to another planetary system and life was detected in the Goldy-locks region, and beings were found to exist there, would we play hide and seek? You know what I mean, would we do everything we could not to let them know we came to their world? What troubles me though is the extensive work done by Dr Jerry Kroth, Dr David Jacobs, Dr John Mack, Dr Stan Fridman, Richard Dolan, and many, many others who have put together some pretty air-tight arguments that our space brothers are not just make believe. Look at the spaceship in Jerry Kroth's video and tell me that isn't incredible!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
First off, Sam Harris and Lex Fridman have to be two of the greatest minds in the world. What I can't understand about freewill---in the sense if it wasn't me who decided to use a drawing by Raphael as the backdrop of my next painting, then who was it? Sam, I treasure and examine with scrutiny every phrase, every word you say, but if it wasn't me who decided to paint my next painting in a certain way, with certain influences, then who in the world was it? Excuse me for coming off as naïve, but wasn't it me who got the inspiration, and then found the Raphael drawing, photographed it, printed it, and finally drew it on a canvas? Both of you are miles ahead of most of us in the cerebral sense, but how can their not be free will?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
What we have to fear about the future is getting there in the first place. Once we are in the future---and by future, I mean for humans to have achieved immortality, becoming machine-beings, and the earth evolving into a garden world, what will become precious is not how far some will go in making themselves into all of these things that are fantasy for us today, no; what will happen is what we are talking about now: bringing back the mammoth. The biological wonder that we call a human being today will get transformed six ways from Sunday, but what the doctors of change will realize is that perfection was leaving a human being alone. Our race will survive because no matter how we upgrade a human being, there is something about us that will trump any mechanical, chemical, surgical enhancement. To recap: in the future there will be islands where the new human-machines live of course, and they will prosper and evolve into silicon beings, but the mainland will be full of farmers and dreamers and people like Lex Fridman and Yuval Noah Harari as well as the guy emptying the rubbish bin working with a robo-man.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
There are some great Youtube channels and then there are even better ones, Lex Fridman goes one step further in his professionalism in interviews that will go through the ages as testimony of our era. Elon Musk will be seen as an innovator and entrepreneur of our time and someone who dared go where no one has gone before. As far as aliens, here is what I have collected---and there is much more---of The Great Pyramid of Giza. Lex, Elon, if it wasn't star children who had a hand in making this structure, they knew how to get to the stars.
1. It is 3/60th of a single degree of true north 2. It weighs 6 million tons 3. Its footprint is 13 acres 4. It is more than 755.9 feet along each side 5. The Great Pyramid is 146.75 m high, its height X a million equals the distance from the Earth to the sun 6. It has more than 2.3 million individual blocks of stone 7. It is locked into the Cardinal dimensions of our planet; The dimensions of the Earth are incorporated into its dimensions 8. If you take the height and multiply it by 43,200 you get the polar radius of the Earth 9. If you measure the base perimeter of the pyramid accurately and multiply that measurement by 43,200 you get the equatorial circumference of the Earth 10. The scale is not random, the number 43,200 is derived from a key motion of the Earth, which is called the precession of the Earth’s axis 11. The Earth wobbles on its axis very slowly at the rate of 1 degree every 72 years; 43,200 is a multiple of 72; 600 X 72 12. The Great Pyramid of Giza gives us the dimensions of the planet on a scale defined by the planet itself 13. There are several 70-ton blocks of granite from a quarry 500 kilometers away, one of hardest stones, raised 300 feet above the ground 14. It has eight sides, and at the spring equinox and the autumn equinox one side of the pyramid is in the shade in the morning and again in the late afternoon and can only be seen from the air 15. It is a calendar 16. It has expansion joints 17. It is located at the exact intersection of the longest line of latitude and the longest line of longitude of the Earth, in other words The Great Pyramid is located at the precise center of the Earth’s land mass 18. The builders possessed highly sophisticated knowledge of mathematics and geometry and they had knowledge of the true dimensions of the Earth to extreme precision 19. The builders possessed exceptionally advanced technical instrumentation (laser guided surveying tools?) to site The Great Pyramid 20. Pi = C over D Phi = Divided by 5 + 1 over 2. Archimedes discovered Pi about 250 BC, but Egyptians knew of it 2,250 years earlier 21. If you subtract the inner circle of the base from the outer circle around the base (the circumference of The Great Pyramid), you get the speed of light in meters to four decimal points: 299,792,458 meters per second 22. The weight of The Great Pyramid is 5,273, 000 tons and that multiplied by a billion is the weight of the Earth 23. The three inner rooms; the king’s chamber, the queen’s chamber and the unfinished chamber under the pyramid are proportional to the distances between Mercury, Venus and the Earth 24. The distance from The Great Pyramid to the North Pole is the same as the distance from The Great Pyramid to the center of the Earth 25. If you divide the perimeter of the pyramid by 1/2 its height the result is 3.14 Pi h/2 = Pi 26. The base side length is 364.242 which is exactly the time in days it takes for the earth to orbit the sun 27. The high chamber is built on a double square, which leads us to the golden ratio geometry 28. Pyramids in China, Mexico and Egypt align with the Orion star system
1
-
1
-
What is it about the end of life that makes us all look into our hearts and minds and soul at the same time? Have you noticed that thinking about one's final minutes----and what I have sometimes pondered on----my last dying breath, does to your state of mind? It shows you what it is going to be like. We are all going to experience it and this frightens me more than anything. Imagine, you and I are breathing away, filling our lungs and blowing out stale air, but one fine moment there will be one final expiration: our last breath of life will leave us to join all the others last breath which leave them and join the atmosphere of the world. As someone who has questioned religion from the first memories of thinking about it, I have to admit there comes out of me a sort of admission or words to... I will say it... God. Then and there I realize that something wants me to believe there is a presence, a creator, but I will never give in for long, because I feel that God is within us as something every person imagines in their own way. Death is the same. Death is something every single person imagines in their own way and that is what makes us all look bewildered when someone talks about their idea of death, because it rarely resembles our own. The key to all of this is what I have come to say are the last words I say to myself before I go into that place, we call dreamland. If you can say that you are happy with yourself before you go to sleep, then that is all you need to know to realize that you have succeeded in finding your purpose here on earth and if your final breath comes in the dead of night, you will know in your mind that your life was lived well and you can die in peace.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Once again I'm chiming in on this very interesting interview by Lex Fridman of Garry Nolan. Why do I keep chirping away about aliens? Because something doesn't jive for me. I can't put my finger on it. The fact that they are buzzing around and have been for as long as recorded history tells us, why on Earth---pun intended---would they be avoiding contact with us at all costs. We have gone over the abduction, planetary acquisition theories, so what I think may be holding them back, and excuse me if I'm repeating myself, but what I think may be causing them to refrain from making a real-time global, media-covered meeting with humans is that perhaps after a thousand years, humans will have abandoned our emotions. We have to imagine that if beings can cross the universe, time is something they have conquered. When humans become immortal, it will be possible to be walking down the street with a friend and a gorgeous girl walks by and your friend says "beautiful girl, she seemed... Does she know you?" " I married her a thousand years ago and we're still friends." Maybe they also 'lost' their beauty by making their bodies 'space-travel ready' in that they made themselves be able to live forever and in doing that abandoned all of the 'human' traits that we have in our time. Do you see what I mean in that there is something very, very wrong with the picture we have of ETs and UFOs. We are being played like we don't really count or maybe it's just to advanced beings we are so insignificant that nothing matters to them about anything we say, do or even exist.
1
-
@SAL Hi, WEll he backs up Jim Rickards assessment to a t: Why Bitcoin, Ripple, Ether and other Crypto-Currencies will fail. It is Non-scalable – Transaction times are slow. “Layering solutions” such as payment channels, “Lightning Network,” “Segregated Witness,” and “Hash Time-Locked Contracts” (HTLC) all suffer defects, have no consensus and violate the “trustless” ethic of the original bitcoin blockchain.
Non-sustainable – Energy use grows exponentially and is wasteful.
Non-regulated – Leads to price manipulation, fraud, front-running, wash sales, etc. No use case – The only use case is for criminals, terrorists, tax evaders, etc.Non-elastic – Money should be elastic to accommodate normal economic growth. Bitcoin was the model T, it's normal it was the first horse out of the stable, but now they've worked out the bugs. Might be wise to invest in the latest model, old technology is not a safe bet.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
What is perplexing is to understand alien psychology. Aren't we really seeing it like this: The aliens; "We judge you so incapable of understanding us or our technology, that we choose not to identify ourselves or allow you to interact with us in any way or know where we're from or what we're doing here. No, we will continue to do flybys, buzz your military and nuclear installations, abduct animals and humans and perform medical experiments, have hubrid individuals bred on our ships and later sent down to infiltrate your society (according to Dr David Jacobs: Walking Among Us). We will not help you stop the onslaught of surpassing the vaious tipping points that will lead to mass extinction if it carries on". What does this tell us about their mentality? It looks like they have evolved from bugs in that emotions seem to have nothing to do with their makeup. It must be that they are a thousand years ahead of us; they've learned to cross the universe without us knowing it. Whatever and/or whoever they are, I think we have to realize that at least a part of them have not got our best interests in mind. Some abductees tell us the aliens say a big change is coming, they are training the abductees to direct masses of people towards certain locations to where I am assuming transport ships will be waitng. But get this: no one is being told where they're going to be taking us. I think we have seen this movie before. But to me, I try to simply gather the facts. Like Mr Nolan, I believe the Zimbabwe school visit stands out as solid proof of their existence. Yet, imagine this: they somehow knew the kids were alone that special day and the exact time. They chose to communicate with the children and ignore telling the adults that our planet was in danger. It's going to make sense to me one day, I'm sure of it. But that day is still a long ways off.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1