Comments by "" (@tekannon7803) on "The Hill" channel.

  1. 24
  2. Dear Ms Crystal and Mr Enjeti, Thank you for bringing new zest to television news. Both of you are sharp as tacks and give a no-thrills look at the world unfolding around us. I am watching from the other side of the world in a country not yet invaded by Russia, so I get it that, well, a lot times I probably don't get it, in regards to what's going on in your country. One thing I do know is that President Trump will only have a four year presidency. I also think a Joe Rogan interview would make Rogan not only look out of his league, but it would ruin what he represents: the rogue interviewer. The daring dude in clinging slinky sweat shirts who smokes joints on the air when the laws are in agreement, and packs a 100 million dollar winning smile He would be accused of being stoned or out of it, and his questions would be short on quality and long on middle-of-the-road inquisitiveness. it would rub off on wrong on the other candidates. It would serve Trump well, but only because he shamelessly muddles through any news worthy sound bite on sheer audacity and love of anything that kindles power, contrariness and confusion and especially glory-talk about his feigned accomplishments. He is aserial lier who lives in his own reality. Rogan would put a shine on his tarnished image, but only until Trump was fact-checked afterwords. All in all, a Rogan interview would come off like a professional wrestling match; a lot of hot air would get tossed around, there would be a lot of laughs, but at the end it would only be a make-believe event that would make America look like a hotdog democracy that got sold to the lowest bidder. In short, I'm going on a bit long, excuse me, because it's hard predicting the future before it happens! Seriously, we can all breathe easy again. Trump will be out. There will be a return to humdrum government speak, but at least America will have the wind in her sails.
    2
  3. 1
  4. Dear Crystal and Saagar, First, do you need three a's in your first name Saagar when two would be more economical and esthetically... Just kidding! Isn't it odd that no one in your business of reporting the news has shown what Britain is doing about taking care of its people. There are no stimulus checks. Everyone keeps their job. If one doesn't work, he or she recieves 70% of their salary until the pandemic is over. Why on earth can't America do the same? Everyone would still have their job, and if they couldn't work because of the pandemic, they would still have a job and still get a paycheck. It beggar's belief that the US Government has to vote on sending out bail-out money to people needing help. It shows that the American system needs an upgrade. This pandemic thing is going to be a lot worse next time around most likely, so it's time to try something that works... like the British system. Lastly, Speaker Pelosi has to hold out because Trump's stimulus includes heavy tax relief for the super-rich. Boys and girls, it's all about politics in your country, but Speaker Pelosi is a front-line worker and no one sees the information she does. Give her a chance to show her strategy. As an overseas viewer, it's too easy for me to criticize, but I think you should focus on what's happening in California with the explosive homeless situation. People are losing their minds over seeing their neighborhoods being invaded by tents and people who have lost all sense of decency by relieving themselves openly on the sidewalks and streets of suburban neighborhoods.
    1
  5. 1
  6. 1
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1