Comments by "" (@tekannon7803) on "DW News" channel.

  1. 301
  2. 261
  3. 101
  4. 81
  5. 75
  6. 65
  7. 63
  8. At only 12:52 into this extraordinary interview with retired British Army General Sir Richard Shirreff, the master of the provocative question, Tim Sebastien, shows us why his interviews stand above the rest like proud sentinels in the world of televised broadcasting. What is clear to me about the Ukrainian war is that what matters most is the mindset of a nation and especially for its political class. Britain has the mindset of a superpower and that is why it really has become a superpower at a time where having all the kit in the world is only secondary. What President Putin has shown us is a mindset that is a mockery of good soldiering. Russian commanders have shown themselves to be inept and incompetent with poor leadership skills. Russia still has a WW I training-manual state of military mind and their lack of concern for the life of their fighting men is appalling. The troubling factor of course, with 'Putin's war' as Chancellor Scholz called it, is that Putin alone decides for his entire nation and he knows he cannot stop the war in Ukraine, because if he does his life will become expendable. What General Shirreff chillingly spells out though, is that complacency has begun settling in like gangrene in our western nations the more the war drags on. The Russians are smiling with glee as their famous and formidable friend, the winter god, is once again going to be a workhorse for them in wearing down the Ukrainian armed forces while the west twiddles its thumbs and gives pro-Ukrainian politicians the finger. We would be fools to refuse to heed Sir Richard's words of wisdom and this is why we must do everything in our power to give the Ukrainians the weopons they need to win their independence.
    57
  9. 54
  10. 44
  11. 41
  12. 38
  13. 38
  14. 35
  15. 18
  16. 16
  17. 16
  18. 14
  19. 13
  20. 12
  21. 10
  22. 10
  23. 9
  24. 9
  25. 9
  26. 9
  27. 8
  28. 8
  29. 7
  30. 6
  31. 6
  32. 5
  33. 4
  34. 4
  35. 4
  36. 4
  37. 4
  38. 3
  39. 3
  40. 3
  41. 3
  42. 3
  43. 3
  44. 3
  45. 3
  46. 2
  47. 2
  48. 2
  49. 2
  50. 2
  51. 2
  52. 2
  53. 2
  54. 2
  55. 2
  56. 2
  57. 2
  58. DW News does not disappoint. You do excellent interviews and ask nothing but highly relevant questions. Justin Crump is a former tank commander and he analyzes the Ukrainian offensive in words that are very clear and he does not have any qualms in criticizing both sides of the conflict. What I take away from the interview is that tanks and armored vehicles are lost in any offensive to artillery, missiles and mines and soldiers get killed and what he said that sticks in my mind is that a tank commander can attack and have a very bad day and lose many tanks to mines etc., and soldiers too. War is brutal as Crump says and people like myself whom have never served in the military see very clearly that there is nothing joyful in winning back a village for the Ukrainians other than they have taken back one of their own, because when the fighting is over there are bodies from both sides of the firefight and that means friends and comrades won't be there for the next fight. We see young men not yet 20 coming out of a battle with an experience that pushes them much farther from their youth than years would do and leaves them with emotional scars that will fester never leave them in a lot of cases. What is practically consistent in all of the military analysts is that there is high praise for the Ukrainian fighting men. Britain, Germany, NATO's allies, all of you must be very proud to have trained tens of thousands of Ukrainians and see what your excellent military instructors have produced: 'A' list soldiers that have the world's admiration as a first class military. There are some terrifying days ahead for all of us, because in the stovepipe command system of Russia, one man bent on restoring his nation's former glory has the keys to the castle. President Putin is undoubtedly calculating what he will do when the walls of the Bastille castle come tumbling down around him and he is alone and faced with a tzars last goodbye. Will Putin leave by the ramp the west is offering him or blow us all up with him?
    2
  59. 2
  60. 2
  61. 2
  62. 2
  63. 2
  64. 2
  65. 2
  66. 2
  67. 2
  68. 2
  69. 1
  70. 1
  71. 1
  72. 1
  73. 1
  74. 1
  75. 1
  76. 1
  77. Happy New Year to Secretary of State Antony Blinken and everyone involved in the middle east conflict that rages on in Gaza. I have no qualifications as a peace negotiator, but I believe I may have a kernel of a plan for peace that could be the way to end all future wars between warring nations. Gaza is 145 square kilometers of blood-soaked sand and it has seen 5 wars in the last 15 years. This should be a red flag to all of us and especially President Guterres of the UN that a new way forward is needed. Here is what might be the key to solving these seemingly intractable conflicts that only ruin lives and leave kids orphaned and without any real future. What do all religious groups respect equally? Nature. My proposal is to transform Gaza into nature reserve cum Galapagos of the middle east to save the frightening number of endangered plants, animal and aquatic life that are disappearing all over the earth at an astounding rate. Imagine Gaza as a Galapagos where instead of wars being fought, animals and plants and aquatic life are being saved and literally brought back from certain extinction! Boys and girls, imagine what future generations will say about us! "Yeah, they found the way to have peace on earth back in 2024 by rescuing nature." We can use wildlife reserves to end these conflicts by transforming murderous border wars into life-saving ventures that will bring in more tourists than the pyramids and have Palestinians, Israelis and other nationalities working side-by-side to save our precious faun and fauna. Palestinians need a country, of course, and this is the mind-bender, but borders have been re-drawn in the past and can be now to come up with a decent parcel of land for these wonderful people who have been on the wrong side of history for far too long. This is doable...
    1
  78. 1
  79. 1
  80. 1
  81. 1
  82. 1
  83. The wolf and animals like it were brought into people's homes and dwellings millennia ago and bred and today there are huge and powerful dogs like the husky who are as gentle with a human baby as humans are. What am I saying here? Max says progress can't be slowed on AI development which is normal because people have to heat their homes and put food in the frig. Victor Hugo famously said that all the armies in the world cannot stop an idea whose time has come. AI as an idea is now interconnected in every apparatus we use and robots will soon be becoming part of our daily life. But let's be real: no matter how intelligent or powerful or whatever super power AI becomes, it must be 'bred' i.e., programmed from its inception to be people-friendly. This is doable and it might seem impossible at this time in the evolution of AI development, but it must be the ultimate goal to have each AI machine or object no more to us than the family dog. AI products must heel i.e., take orders; a robot must obey and protect and respect all human life and especially a child. AI must obey commands that are sound, and above all else it must be like the family dog and love humans. We have to incorporate this artificial 'gene' in the synthetic DNA of all AI machines. Period. The metaphor that AI is a wolf in today's level of technology is how we should proceed; there is no doubt we are going to have serious problems because of it breaking free and becoming unmanageable until we succeed in making it obey us unconditionally, but we will prevail because we have to. Fire was an invention that became a way for us to heat our homes, cook our food, but it can be weapon or cause destruction. Enter; the fire department.
    1
  84. 1
  85. 1
  86. 1
  87. 1
  88. 1
  89. 1
  90. 1
  91. 1
  92. 1
  93. 1
  94. 1
  95. 1
  96. 1
  97. 1
  98. 1
  99. 1
  100. 1
  101. 1
  102. 1
  103. 1
  104. 1
  105. 1
  106. 1
  107. 1
  108. 1
  109. 1
  110. 1
  111. 1
  112. 1
  113. 1
  114. 1
  115. 1
  116. 1
  117. 1
  118. 1
  119. 1
  120. 1
  121. 1
  122. 1
  123. 1
  124. 1
  125. 1
  126. 1
  127. 1
  128. 1
  129. 1
  130. 1
  131. 1
  132. 1
  133. 1
  134. 1
  135. 1
  136. This is an excellent vocast and at the same time terrifying to see the Rhine river looking like a stream. How could so much water have been whisked away? I mean, a river has hundreds of thousands of gallons of water moving down stream. Professor Bart van den Hurk points out very clearly that rising temperatures are the next pandemic affecting our weather system. This means one thing that no one is talking about yet. We have to go about solving this problem on a global scale and quit having individual countries go it on their own. We need a fresh water management czar at the UN who is given powers to transport water where it is needed. We need to have a UN funded climate control bureau set up where we have the top scientists in the world at work trying to reverse-engineer rain clouds and find a way to reflect heat back into space. One thing I think should be looked into is water transfer mechanisms i.e., aqueducts put under our roads, highways and railways. Grey water could be sent under the roads to where it was needed and at the same time could lower the temperatures of the roads that get so hot they buckle in summer. Everything must be tried, but what we need is this problem of climate change to be delegated to a special branch of the UN. We need a global climate czar and not a toothless bureaucracy that only can tell us what's wrong and give advice. We also have to realize we cannot stop burning fossil fuels and this means we have to work around it. We have to become the masters of our weather and there is no better time than now for us to take a year or two off of blowing ourselves up with more and more sophisticated weapons and putting all of our brainpower into reverse engineering the weather system of our planet. It's doable. We must do it.
    1
  137. Excellent reporting and if I may say something as a layperson with no military experience to Mr Ledwidge. What I think we have to realize is that the west is finally using Lavrovian diplomacy tools in detailing arms shipments and battleground tactics and projections on the end of the conflict. What do I mean by Lavrovian diplomacy? The Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov says one thing and does another thing the next day. It's the Russian way to keep the opposition off-balance. I could be wrong, but I think what we are seeing is the Ukrainians and the western allies are using the same technique. They say they're delivering 4 rocket launchers---but that might be today's batch. Lastly, and it would be interesting to have Frank's take on this suggestion. Mr Ledwidge, wouldn't it be a better way to cover the war and help the Ukrainians win the war by staying in 24-hour increments? What do I mean by 24 time periods. If we just report what is going on in the 24-hour period we call real-time, it won't be so frightening to constantly be worrying about how the Ukraine is going to stay in the safe-zone in, say, 8 months. Everyone is starting to get worried about how on Earth the Ukrainian economy can pay for the war etc. What this does is make it look hopeless; wars cannot be predicted so let's just focus on the next 24 hours and this allows the Ukrainians to focus on what they're doing today and the rest of the world can evaluate what is happening right now and how to better use the resources they have to continue fighting rather than what the west is going to send in 6 weeks time. There are too many moving parts. Let's stay in a 24 hour or similarly short time span and not look further. It's better to take small steps to victory than live with some hypothetical amount of time for an end to a conflict that not even military specialists like Mr Ledwidge could predict with any degree of accuracy; no one knows for sure when the fighting in the Ukraine will end so why should we be wringing our hands and worrying about something we have no control over.
    1
  138. 1
  139. 1
  140. What is all the fuss about? Here is the deal. Both China and the USA are nuclear powers. An accident would lead to attacks with conventional weapons and then a nuclear device would be used. Simple as that. All this posturing is ridiculous. China, like Russia, is---for lack of a better term---a tzarist nation. From top down, it's stovepipe leadership. We can huff and puff all we want, but they are going to live with one-man-rule for as long as we're in the world; it's a bitter pill to swallow and if we don't there is only Armageddon waiting in the wings. The Chinese system is one person calling the shots---as they do in Russia. So; what's the solution for the South China Sea and Taiwan hullaballoo? You just keep throwing this line of questioning and response at the Chinese when they do a daring maneuver with one of their warships or planes: "Hey, we're listening. What's up guys? What are you trying to tell us? What do you want us to do?" This is all you can do realistically. And: you don't have to obey their commands. Yes; we have to accept what is unacceptable in our culture and way of life and do our best to avoid an air collision or a sea mishap, but we have to understand that the Chinese mentality is a one-way street. So; you keep asking every time there is a new provocation: "Hi guys, we're listening, what do you want? Is there something we can do to help?" You don't have to do what they say, but what doesn't work is to flex your muscles. The Chinese cannot lose face on the international stage; they do not use emotions like we do. They always have a poker face: we have to do the same. It's either play the game like this or risk nuclear annihilation for billions of people.
    1
  141. 1
  142. 1
  143. As someone not in the military or politics---I am an artist---what I see as the solution to the terrible situation that is boiling over in the middle east is for the UN to put every dossier on the back-burner and get people like General (Ret.) Petraeus to weigh in on this proposal. First, in my opinion, Hamas only exists because of the suffering of a great people called the Palestinians. They are wonderful people who have been on the wrong side of history for too long. Take away the suffering and Hamas would have no reason to exist. What is my solution? Gaza is a blood-soaked piece of territory of 145 square kilometers that was described by former American President Jimmy Carter as an open prison. Let's be real: that is no place for kids to grow up. Gaza could be transformed into a wildlife sanctuary cum Galapagos of the middle east that could see Israelis working alongside the other nations to help save the dwindling numbers of species of plant, animal and aquatic life and save many creatures and plants and fish and the like. Every one of us will be proud of our generation to have found a way out of these interminable and senseless conflicts that ruin people’s lives. Borders need to be redrawn in the region and a territory of sufficient size set up to house the entire Palestinian population that would be free from outside intervention, settlers, etc. The incredible task of relocating 2.3 million people to a new homeland is logistic challenge that only people like General Petraeus could achieve. You see, I am in it for the kids. For a child to have lived through 5 wars in 15 years is inadmissible in our times. We could be the generation that solves these neighboring-country wars by creating something and that something could be nature reserves. Every religious group respects nature.
    1
  144. 1
  145. 1
  146. 1
  147. It is mind boggling to hear Vladimir Putin warn the west not to send the weapons to Ukraine that it needs to defend itself. That's like being in a shipwreck and the captain saying not to throw life preservers to certain people swimming for their lives or he will shoot those who try to help them. To send in hypersonic missiles and rain down missiles and phosphorous bombs on civilian targets and to have Russian tanks blast away at apartment buildings and level the Ukrainian infra-structure and burn down homes and kill civilians and rape the women and throw them in mass graves is what President Putin's roving bands of military exercise specialists has been doing to a sovereign state. We must remember that under international law that was signed by Moscow, all the treaties say that sovereign countries get to choose what alliances sovereign countries belong to. Treaties like the UN Charter was signed by Russia. The 1975 Helsinki agreement was signed by the Soviet Union. The 1990 Charter of Paris for a new Europe was also signed by the Soviet Union. The 1997 NATO Russia Founding Act was equally signed by the Russian Government. All those documents were signed by either the Soviet Regime or the Russian regime, which is the legally recognized international inheritor i.e., successor of the Soviet State. The fact is those agreements are still in place and they clearly state that sovereign countries can freely choose their foreign policy and what alliances they want to join. For the President of Russia to warn western nations not to help the Ukrainians defend themselves is pure hypocrisy and insulting to the free world writ large.
    1
  148. 1
  149. 1
  150. 1
  151. 1
  152. 1