Comments by "" (@tekannon7803) on "WOKENESS: THE NEW WESTERN MORALITY | DOUGLAS MURRAY #CLIP" video.
-
Dear Mr Anderson and Mr Murray, you always present your discussions in a balanced and fair way Mr Anderson, and Mr Murray has an eagle eye for pointing out the inconsistencies in social issues that besiege us. One new reality we are all facing is that the LGBT community are now having children and becoming parents. My question or topic today deals with a woman being married to another woman, or as is in your case, Mr Murray, perhaps you are in a permanent relationship with your partner who is another man or intend to make it legal one day. Please understand that what I am about to say is with complete respect of every human being’s personal choices and the choices of every man and woman in the world. My point of contention is this: It is none of my business – or anyone else’s for that matter-- that a person has a relationship with another person of the same sex, or if a person decides to change their sex… the list goes on. But shouldn’t we think of our children in all of these groundbreaking events involving the LGBT community? I don’t think anybody is taking into consideration the effect of a man saying he is married to another man or a woman saying she is married to another woman on the fragile young minds of boys and girls of, say, 5, 6, 7 or even 8 years old. What do I mean by that? It is my belief that it is too complex for children of a young age to really take in what it means that a man is married to another man or a woman to a woman, or whatever other kind of relationship that is not a man and a woman. Adults can barely handle what is happening to society; children cannot be expected to comprehend abstract issues their parents are often puzzled over. What’s my point? We need new terms for the new relationships and the people in and around them. I am an inventor. If I invented the word—to marry—for example, to mean the civil union of a man and a woman, I would not want it used differently. Here is my proposition and please consider it as simply a proto-type or suggestion of how the unions between same-sex couples and the names of the people involved could be named. (Prototype terminology for the Lesbian, Gay, Trans community and other sexual identities that may be coming down the pike.) Lesbian relationships. Lesbiate = marry, a lesbian who wants to marry another lesbian, Lesbiated = a lesbian woman who has joined in civil union with another woman, Lesbiage = a marriage between two women, Le-fem = wife in feminine sense of lesbian (Perhaps some lesbian relationships would prefer to have a sense of <wife> for the opposite partner. Le-hom = husband in feminine sense of lesbian (Perhaps some lesbian relationships would prefer to have a sense of <husband> for the opposite partner). Children of Lesbians could call them their ‘Lesrents’. Now for Gay relationships: Gayriate = to marry, a gay man who wants to marry another gay man, for example, perhaps you and your partner are Gayriated = a gay man who is (married) joined in civil union with another gay man. Gayriage = a marriage between two gay men. Ga-fem = the wife sense of a gay man’s partner (Perhaps some gay relationships would prefer to have a sense of <wife> for the opposite partner) Ga-hom = the husband sense of a gay man’s partner (Perhaps some gay relationships would prefer to have a sense of <husband> for the opposite partner). Children of a gay couple could call his father and father his ‘gayrents’. Please forgive me if I have offended anyone. My goal is not to diminish the importance of the new society being created, but to put new names on the diverse relationships that are being created. We and especially the children of these relationships need new ways to call the people in their orbit. They are finding themselves in situations that have never been seen in the public arena before, and they are living situations the friends in straight couple relationships cannot relate to. I have invented these proto-type names as a way to have children see complex things in a way I believe they need to be able to distinguish for them to understand. The whole idea is to simplify in easy-to-under-stand terms so that young children can easily distinguish people in heterosexual and homosexual relationships and civil unions with new terminology that is tailor-made for their mindset. Children need to have different words to say that a man and woman are married, or a woman and a woman are lesbiated, or a man and a man are gayriated etc. Lastly, kids from same-sex parents could use this terminology: Co-pere for the ‘father’ or dominant figure in the relationship. Co-mare for the ‘femine’ or passive figure in the relationship. Your son or daughter, Mr Murray, might say to his friends in reference to you that he was going to the ball game with his Co-mare or Co-pere tonight. Again, these are examples; people will come up with their own words once there is a change in terminology. Kids will invent words too. The English language is rich, and new words get invented often. My only hope is the LGBT community and traditional society will appreciate that this is for the children and that they will consider adopting new words that I offer in the Linux way i.e. for the good of humanity, as a way of cementing their relationships so that young children will be better able to understand the world they live in . Please Mr Anderson and Mr Murray, could you give us your feedback at some later discussion? Be well.
1