Youtube hearted comments of (@tekannon7803).

  1. 117
  2. 78
  3. 75
  4. 55
  5. Once again, Professor Miano, you have provided us with the information needed to show that Gobekli Tepe was most likely the result of a natural, gradual increase in knowledge from the hunter gatherer civlizations and I would imagine if time travel became a possible way to see it for ourselves, we would see the hunter gatherers as much more multi-dimensional with board games and all sorts of kit that has never made it to our time. They are getting labeled as nothing more than foraging tribes of people incapable of complex thought or imagination; the human mind I am sure back then was just as full of ideas as in the present day---and maybe even more so, because we have practically buried things like intuition whereas older civilizations probably relied on the sixth sense to get a lot things done. What probably was the case was that hunter gatherer tribes had elaborate settlements that followed the seasons i.e., followed the game and there was undoubtedly a sophisticated society albeit a traveling one, and these settlements were gobbled up by father time and nothing is left. Gobekli Tepe looks to me more like primitive hands were the architects of structures that I am sure were easily imagined, deftly constructed and nothing new to the people of the time. We must remember one thing that all of us can never know and that is that 'time' as we know it didn't exist. Languages probably only had the present tense. Building sites like Gobekli Tepe might have taken a century, but for the people of that era, there was no century, you simply drew your plans in the sand every day and worked until it was finished.
    22
  6. 20
  7. 18
  8. 15
  9. 11
  10. 10
  11. 8
  12. I'm commenting from overseas and what I see in Camden, New Jersey is the hidden face of our global economic system: consumer Capitalism. According to some sources, capitalism began in 1694 when The Bank of England issued the first bonds. In other words, we have been living under an economic system that was concieved when there were about a billion and a half people in the world. It's more than 3 centuries later and we're still using this antiquated economic system that has clearly run itself off the rails and can no longer take care of the majority of the population. It's a system that is made like feudalism on steroids. Denis Villeneuve is an example of why it's wrong for our times. Why Villeneuve? He's a science fiction director. Yes; but there's only room for one big fish in the pond. Because making money is the only thing that counts---everyone else gets to watch and once again---only one person is in charge. What no one seems to realize is that the people who live in Camden are good people trying to make a better life for themselves---just like all of us. It's a known fact that broken windows left unfixed and trash strewn everywhere is a magnet for people on the way down. But again, people on the way down shouldn't be condemned; they are only the one's who slip through the social net. Everywhere you look we see over and over again that capitalism is like a blanket that's too small and only covering a part of you at night in bed you when its cold. Whatever you do, a foot, a hand, a shoulder gets exposed to the cold---you can't sleep; you wake up miserable. The trouble is that we worship anyone who does manage to make it; in the USA there are 650 billionaires. They take up the spotlight and all of us blindly fall in behind them scratching our way to top and selling our souls to get a swimming pool in the backyard.
    6
  13. 5
  14. 4
  15. 4
  16. 4
  17. 4
  18. 3
  19. 3
  20. 3
  21. 2
  22. 2
  23. 2
  24. Please let me add this comment after watching the whole 3 hours of Professor Miano's video. I am obliged to side with the professor in that probably 95% of what I thought must have been achieved by an advanced civlization was indeed done by the workers of the time. All this time I have thought the giant circular saws must have been taken away by the advanced civilization as well as the other 'high tech' equipment, but as Professor Miano points out that surely some of the high tech material would have remained. What I think is the main element that we fail to recognize is that 'time' was not something that people constructing those structures even thought about. You simply worked until something was done. If it took 6 months of our time to cut through a massive stone, they probably never thought twice about going to work every day for half a year until it was done. Transporting huge stones must have been the same; they simply stayed with it until they got the stone moved. Lastly, we have to have a scientific team do the measurements on some of the sculptures and statues and boxes and give us all the data. I am happy unchartered X keeps going for more proof, but we have got to find a way to get a team of experts going over measurements and not just a handful of people. It's hard for me to see that an advanced civilization was not involved, but we have to accept that there are no tools left behind for one thing, and the expertise of the sculptors and builders of ancient times would probably surprise us as generations of the same family would be providing artisans, stone cutters, builders, craftsmen of astounding ability. What is perplexing is how all of their efforts came to a halt. Why would they have stopped building those magnificent structures?
    2
  25. 2
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1