Comments by "spacetoast7" (@spacetoast7783) on "Sam Harris" channel.

  1. Closer to bringing it in? It is here right now.
    43
  2.  @danzwku  Bro I want to watch that interview but I'm afraid to. I know my feed will be completely taken over by JP. The algorithm just goes wild every time I watch any of his content.
    28
  3. Because that 0.02% chance of death is still several orders of magnitude higher than the vaccines have shown, and you're much more likely to harm someone you pass the virus along to.
    21
  4.  @stonecoldscubasteveo4827  I'm glad you aren't saying it's wrong. You're just saying it makes you happy.
    20
  5.  @Aureilius2112  Why? Surely you e seen the greivous error of your thinking by now at least.
    17
  6. 5:30 is the perfect example of a neutrality bias.
    13
  7. Seek treatment for your TDSDS. Your tics are out of control.
    13
  8. One side thrice nominated a guy for president who repeatedly calls for political violence against his opposition. One side didnt.
    11
  9.  @stephengehly2319  Read again. She said "get rid of", not "vote for".
    11
  10.  @brucecook502  1. Who here called her an angel? 2. Was she running on proposition h for America? 3. Why are gun rights so much more important to you than free speech and free press? Why are they so much more important than the checks and balances of power across the branches of government?
    11
  11.  @kadourimdou43  Bro I can't watch that interview because I'm terrified of my feed being completely taken over by JP. The algorithm just goes wild every time I watch any of his content.
    11
  12. Care to elaborate?
    11
  13. 5:30 it is insane to equate those two assessments
    10
  14. Yeah, Trump is running for president again. Try to keep up.
    9
  15.  @johnowens5342  Who are you even talking to???? Did someone say replacing "regulations" is fascism?
    9
  16.  @gnlout  Is it out of touch to talk about how Trump is behaving?
    8
  17. It's reasonable to dislike misinformation.
    8
  18.  @abstractnonsense3253  Are you okay bro?
    8
  19. Ecstasy for China and Russia maybe. The rule of law has almost totally collapsed in the US.
    8
  20. What exact institutional corruption are you referencing?
    8
  21. What do you think they got wrong based on the information they had at the time?
    7
  22.  @jjd-lx5vr  Fascism is already here my friend. You somehow retroactively made a failed prediction.
    7
  23.  @prasannadeshpande4435  But he hasn't cut any spending. How are you giving him credit for stuff he hasn't even attempted to do? 😂
    7
  24. What are they doing right?
    6
  25. Seek treatment for your TDSDS. Your tics are out of control.
    6
  26.  @pythagoran  Care to elaborate?
    6
  27.  @blooper6543  Yes, I need examples of censorship of valid evidence for that hypothesis.
    6
  28. Good news for you: We get this every election! You'll get to see it again in two years!
    6
  29.  @RatmanSays  Every count room had equal numberss of observers from each party. The recounts were done by hand, not by machine. I'm sure you're happy to know that the election results are very trustworthy.
    6
  30. Did you forget about Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, Barrack Obama, John Kerry, Al Gore, Bill Clinton, Michael Dukakis, Walter Mondale, and Jimmy Carter? You have clinical levels of memory loss. Seek medical help.
    6
  31.  @thunkjunk  Your TDSDS has left you in critical condition. You need immediate medical attention.
    6
  32. Yes, I'm glad you agree that Trump and Qultists are making false statements that are dangerous to a functional democracy. Its a valid concern about what they say.
    5
  33.  @TheAlibabatree  These comments are full of new people who just read the title and went straight to the comments.
    5
  34. ​ @zedxxx9  Please give the "serious reasons" instead of vaguely aluding to their existence. Russia is not acting defensively in any sense of the word.
    5
  35. The Russians just want to provide objective information with no bias whatsoever.
    5
  36.  @Jake-Day  Why does the origin matter? You haven't rebutted that point at all. You went on a tangent about how not knowing the origin hurt your feelings.
    5
  37.  @wasdwasdedsf  Skill issue
    5
  38. Indeed, speaking in fluent sentences is vastly superior to the guy who can't.
    5
  39. I finally watched. I don't think Peterson substantiated his points very well, but he definitely commanded the conversation. She didn't have counters to his conjecture, just more of her own.
    5
  40. Do you have any examples of this happening?
    5
  41. This podcast wasn't about non-vaccines. You're obviously very confused
    5
  42. Like a true American
    4
  43. The fairness doctrine has absolutely nothing to do with cable or the Internet.
    4
  44.  @danzwku  Cathy Newman was a different interview. She did even worse, I think.
    4
  45.  @KemAMP  That's your TDSDS talking. Normal people can acknowledge bad behavior of your favorite politician.
    4
  46.  @aiartrelaxation  Thank you for telling me the earth is flat.
    4
  47. I think it's pretty clear. Not all speech is a valuable contribution to discourse.
    4
  48.  @blue24563  What did she say here that Sam failed to push back on? Was there something recent he should have confronted her on?
    4
  49. it certainly would have been interesting for them to be able to predict the future
    4
  50.  @Mr.Opinion  Probably because it's not actually possible to predict the future, unless you're schizophrenic.
    4