Comments by "spacetoast7" (@spacetoast7783) on "LegalEagle" channel.

  1.  @mrmallard4600  You're wasting your breath. Most of this audience is American so they don't care about how Trump sold out to your country.
    2
  2. Are the Clintons in the room with you right now?
    2
  3. No they didn't.
    2
  4. Yep. Fire 'em.
    2
  5. In America, we value free expression and individual rights, but I know that wouldn't fly in your personal fascist "utopia".
    2
  6. It seems particularly weak. I wonder if those justices will ignore all precedent prior to the 19A.
    2
  7. Where are the equivalent anti-Hamas protests?
    2
  8.  @nuynobi  I'm sorry Hamas is so incompetent and therefore we're stuck with no genocide. That must be tough for you.
    2
  9. That sounds very far from ready for humans lol. I'm not even sure how you could do that human experiment ethically.
    2
  10. By your logic, the government can force you to get decorative body piercings because it's not specifically prohibited by the constitution.
    2
  11. Don't consent to sex if you don't want the risk of pregnancy. You can't consent to drinking alcohol without also consenting to getting drunk.
    2
  12.  @MaJetiGizzle  I'm sorry for taking OP at their word.
    2
  13. Conduct search warrants, intervene in crimes, conduct arrests, enforce laws. Tons of stuff.
    2
  14. Nobody has ever said that.
    2
  15. Then vote for policies that fire bad police officers. Don't absolve yourself of responsibility.
    2
  16.  @Jessie_Helms  Wtf are you talking about? First of all, Supreme court justices are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate. You are perfectly able to vote for President and Senator. Secondly, they never ruled that police can't be held to a high standard. It's like you didn't watch this video at all before commenting. And third, the federal government doesn't run your local police. You need to vote in your local elections, genius. Fire the bad cops. Don't absolve yourself of responsibility in your society.
    2
  17.  @Jessie_Helms  You literally said that judges should not have lifetime appointments. Your memory is absolute trash. See a doctor. You also apparently don't have a passing familiarity with the US constitution. The Supreme Court didn't rule that police officers can't be reprimanded. I don't know why you keep mentioning that you're very young. It has nothing to do with the subject. How can you be so wrong and so confident? Stay in school. You're setting yourself up for a life of failure.
    2
  18. What country is that? That seems incredibly expensive. Do you just have no crimes in your country?
    2
  19. It's as controversial as demanding the last presidential election be overturned because of widespread fraud.
    2
  20. Who are you talking to?
    2
  21. What would you do differently? Do you want to give the police so much funding that they can write checks to the victim of every crime?
    2
  22. Except crime, wealth, education...
    2
  23. Kinda. That's basically how securities work.
    2
  24. Vietnam just really really really really really hates China
    2
  25. Then you own the consequences. You don't get all the protections of peace when you won't be peaceful yourself.
    2
  26. Which river and which sea are you talking about anyway? Who lives there?
    2
  27. Which the court hasn't ruled on
    2
  28. Who are you talking to??
    2
  29. LOL What? How is 50 out of 100 a super majority?
    2
  30.  @shytguy  Having 50% or more in two branches of government is not enough to pass a controversial social policy.
    2
  31. ​ @shytguy  Well I'm glad you were able to learn something from me today.
    2
  32. Is Harris in the room with you right now?
    2
  33. No, they can't restrict it based on content. The restrictions must be narrowly tailored to serve a compelling government interest.
    2
  34.  @nuynobi  That's not what OP said. Do you think OP is wrong?
    2
  35.  @nuynobi  Then why use it as an excuse for violence?
    2
  36.  @nuynobi  OP is rebutting LE's analysis of the illegal protests by calling the protests "disruptive", and by calling disruptiveness good. Try to keep up. Read the first post in the thread before replying next time.
    2
  37.  @nuynobi  Bro, go get an adult. You literally have failed to read and understand every single comment in this thread. The education system has failed you.
    2
  38.  @nuynobi  What question do you think I did not answer? 😂 Seriously, get an adult to help you with the conversation. You clearly can't handle it on your own.
    2
  39. What lie do you think they told?
    2
  40. You're way off the mark. If we assume that every abortion was a first-time abortion, only about 22% of pregnancies end that way.
    2
  41. They're required to do what you tell them to do. Vote. Don't absolve yourself of responsibility.
    2
  42. You have to get rid of the first amendment for a blanket doxxing ban.
    2
  43. ​ @le-coup-détat  First of all, I never said that every police officer is maximally heroic in every single situation. I was just answering OP's question. Secondly, they literally ran into the shooting as soon as they arrived on site. It sounds like you don't know anything about this event, so you should stop talking about it.
    2
  44. Why do we need to relitigate some ancient news about a random guy?
    2
  45. It's not messed up at all. The police can't write a check to every person who's ever the victim of a crime.
    2
  46.  @jasonpatterson8091  Huh? You're conflating liability with job requirements. You're making no sense at all.
    2
  47. Why leave a comment if you didn't watch the video at all?
    2
  48. Because he keeps doing stuff to gain attention
    2
  49. 2% inflation and 30% inflation are basically the same. Prices go up in both scenarios.
    2
  50. For obvious reasons that are explained in this video.
    2