Comments by "Bobr Kurwa" (@mr.purple1779) on "Celtic History Decoded" channel.

  1. It is noteworthy that the samples of Malta MA1 on the graph of the main components are located close to the Udmurts, a little stretched to Mansi. And also the Tocharians were just ANE, or ANE + Paleo-Siberian. So the redhead is probably really from the Paleolithic.
    33
  2. he's a fraud
    5
  3. I have Hazel eyes closer to green. I have Tatar roots between the Volga and Western Siberia and northern Kazakhstan. And apparently I'm not alone. I also think that yamna pastoralists are not accidentally described as light/inermediate skin and variable aye color some with blonde hair.
    5
  4.  @patrickmcelligott5646  Chinese silk from Volga Bulgaria. Only nomads had valuable goods. 3:05
    5
  5.  @michaelfritts6249  At least a series of skulls of the Golden Horde population showed that in total they were closest to the Pazyryk Scythians (Asian Saka). And although the Tatars are not so much connected with the Golden Horde as with earlier cattle breeders, of course there were no blacks there, but at least Tom Hanks actually looks quite Tatar.
    4
  6. They do not descend from WHG as Western Europeans. In addition, the climate there is not damp, but cruel cold, where, on the contrary, narrow eyes are needed.
    4
  7.  @eponymousarchon7442  They have now included additional denominators. Pastoralists are the Lower Volga cline. The Middle Stack is the ancestor of Europeans, a mixture of local hunters and the Volga cline, which had or did not have a relationship with the Volga cline, to a greater or lesser extent. Thus, it is far from a fact that western Europeans are related to the original nomads.
    3
  8. You're basically a rape victim.
    3
  9. By the way, Eurasian nomads have very similar arts 12:30. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V2jHXL-VjfI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sxzI5RVK59A https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DC0jTqYguUI In a sense, there was a similar story in the Bulgar-Tatar (Kipchak) ornamental art. In the 9th century, they adopted Islam. In Islam, the image of animals was prohibited, so the style of the ornament began to be depersonalized. Animalistic motifs, as it were, began to be embedded in a floral ornament, uniting in a common meaning. Modern ornamental art can be like incoherent Scandinavian knit. But the general form and symbols preserve a very ancient archaic structure. In academic sources, you can find a description of triangles, circles, some lines and forms, so on, since for nomads each line, shape and flower had a sacred meaning.
    3
  10. This is a fifteen-year-old map from the eupedia website. When there was nothing else but homogeneous markers and shows Bashkirs. Now there are already professional maps and amateur of decent quality, when the main component is taken from the population and amplified in other populations.
    2
  11. Most directly related. The Scythians originated the Xiongnu, but the Xiongnu originated the Huns. Pazyryk culture (Asian Saka Scythians) was transformed into the culture of the Hunnic type Bulan Koba. And also the Huns moving westward met with the Sarmatians. They formed the Hunno-Sarmatian period. And then the modern Volga Tatar people. (Kipchak-speaking former nomads). And the small Altai peoples - Tubalar, Teleut and so on and especially the Siberian Tatars are close to Pazyrykians. The history of nomads is completely not about the Persians and other southern Middle Eastern Iranoid Arabic or Hindus Asians. They just never happened there.
    2
  12.  @LuisAldamiz  I mean new data on Altai hunter gatherers. Which seem to have never been published. I watched a detailed lecture on them. "Middle Holocene Siberian genomes reveal highly connected gene pools throughout North Asia" 2023 Kipchak-speaking peoples associated with the Scytho-Siberian world, Sarmatians and Western Huns are located on the slope between Altai HG and IE Steppe. And also on the network there is a new article on Tocharians. "The genomic origins of the Bronze Age Tarim Basin mummies" 2021 These guys turned out to be almost 100% ANE people. So they were quite healthy at that time, at least. ANE played an important role for many - Okunev culture, Dzungaria_EBA, Botai. So in 2023 it was quite a good reference component. And it is also worth saying that modern Malta MA1 located on the Udmurts. So the ANE people are kind of still alive. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uhK5VNmyn9I
    2
  13.  @user-yt3xd2jl6d  Western Europeans have Middle Eastern Anatolian Caucasoid DNA. Steppe DNA in far-eastern Europeans associated with Siberia.
    2
  14.  @serkankinden5150  Because Iranians and Indians are not Indo-Europeans. But, southern and Middle Eastern Asians who received an influx of sintashta. However, the Siberian Hunnic-Turkic are Europeans or Siberians.
    2
  15.  @carmenm.4091  Native Siberians, Ancient northern Eurasians in the modern sense are Americanoids. Even the Eastern hunter 0:55 should not be particularly considered Caucasoid. The Paleolithic of Siberia was closer to the Native Americans, Mongoloid features developed as a result of adaptation.
    2
  16. Early Scythians originated in Siberia as an amalgamation of steppe and Paleo-Siberian populations. The first notable was the Tagar culture 800 BC. on average 80/20% of west-east Eurasian origin. Then they invaded Europe.
    2
  17. the cheddar had blue eyes. I don't know where you got 10% in Europe from if western hunter-gatherers are responsible for colored eyes in Europe.
    2
  18. They probably mean a haplogroup, but full-genomic data will not say this.
    1
  19. steppes are not related to blue eyes.
    1
  20.  @celtichistorydecoded  Historically, the Scythians were destroyed by the Sarmatians. The Sarmatians destroyed nomadic sites, but they rarely attacked mixed Greek Black Sea settlements. So the Scythians in a sense existed after. But they were fishermen and traders. Then, in the end, they were absorbed into the Goths of Germanarich. (Chernyakhov culture). There was a separate paper on Moldovian samples. They mainly turned out to be from the Bronze Age Srubnaya culture, probably the early Saka assimilated the local population in Europe. In fact, modern Western Europeans do not so rarely have 10-20% DNA from the Scythians, but they will probably be associated with those Moldavians, but not with Asian pastoralists (aka Don-Altai), like the Tatar Bulgar-Kipchaks. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FVHYhSVMI8E
    1
  21. not Turkey, Tatars. Volga-Altai groups of Kipchak languages.
    1
  22.  @deniztatl9992  Not wrong. Turks belong to Turkey.
    1
  23.  @deniztatl9992  What nonsense?
    1
  24.  @erikheddergott5514  The paper "Yamnaya 2024" has been released. Proto-IE were specific South Volga horse breeders. Yamnaya formed when they mixed with Dnieper hunter-gatherers who had different degrees of kinship with them. However, the core in the east remained similar to the Volga. Probably the Afonasyevites who went to Siberia were true IE. 7:13 There, in Siberia, in contact with the Paleo-Siberian cultures, was formed oldest Karasuk metallurgical province. Which were able to influence both China and Europe on a significant part of the continent. If so, then the IE people were similar to the Volga-Altai Turkic peoples, not to the main Europeans. Who today are small and invisible.
    1
  25. Because without your genius 65 IQ points, no one could come to this conclusion before.
    1
  26. Why did they all go to this island? Such a herd of elephants was breaking into a miserable patch of land.
    1
  27.  @foxtrot4755  Tatars are not far-eastern Mongoloids, aka Buryats and Kalmyks. It is a Kipchak language group. Siberian Tatars and Bashkirs preserve the Saka anthropo-complex.Volga Tatars are Karasuk culture, Zevakino-Chilikta, Cimmerians and Sarmatians. They all always had Paleo-Siberian ancestry related to the Uralic. Slavs Russians are not related to the Caucasianism of the Volga-Ural-Altaic cluster of indigenous peoples. From the word in general.
    1
  28. Blue eyes are not IE related. The Black Sea IEs originated from the same proto-Europoids - Uraloids from the mammoth steppe. Which then mixed with Caucasoids from Georgia. And they were not Nordic, rather proto-Europeoid "Eastern Mediterranean".
    1
  29.  @Non_auro_sed_ferro_recuperanda  Both of them (Gimbutas and Russian archaeologists) never said anything like that. XD
    1
  30.  @Non_auro_sed_ferro_recuperanda  Blue eyes are not related to Indo-Europeans, from the word in general.
    1
  31.  @Non_auro_sed_ferro_recuperanda  Your favorite Reich, also did not say anything like that. In fact, no western european population, in direct comparison, will show close results. Not even in the top ten, perhaps.
    1
  32.  @Non_auro_sed_ferro_recuperanda  You give a book that you probably haven't read. Even Wikipedia says that European populations arose as a result of mixing. Reich has never said that you are Indo-European, or that you are especially close to them.
    1
  33.  @Non_auro_sed_ferro_recuperanda  Author and intellectual Jared Diamond, in the New York Times, notes that geneticists can now go far beyond studying the personal ancestries of participants in National Geographic's Genographic Project, which looked at small sections of their parents' DNA, namely their mother's mitochondrial DNA and their father's Y chromosome. By looking at DNA from ancient bones, Reich can recover whole genomes. Diamond warns readers not to expect an oversimplified story:[7] Population genetics is a complicated, fast-moving field with many uncertainties of interpretation. To tell that story to the broad public, and not just to scientists reading specialty journals, is a big challenge. Reich explains these complications as well as any geneticist could; others rarely even try.[7] Peter Forbes, in The Guardian, calls the book "thrilling in its clarity and its scope."[4] In Forbes's view, Reich handles racist abuses of human origin stories, such as Nazi ideology, "commendably". Forbes writes that Reich explains how ancient DNA teaches a single general lesson, that the human population of any particular place has repeatedly changed since the last ice age. Any supposed "mystical, longstanding" link between some people and a place based on some kind of racial purity (as reflected in the Nazi slogan of "blood and soil"), is in Reich's words "flying in the face of hard science".[4]
    1
  34.  @Non_auro_sed_ferro_recuperanda  Much of the work has focused on Western Eurasia, where in 1786 Sir William Jones discovered that Sanskrit and ancient Greek were related languages. Linguists came to recognise the Indo-European family of languages, spanning Germanic, Celtic, Italic, Iranian and northern Indian languages, but without explaining how these came to be. Reich showed that modern populations in Europe and north India derive from mixing of native populations with Yamnaya people from the steppes north of the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea some 5,000 years ago, in separate migrations to the west and the east.[4][9] Corded ware culture described by archaeology corresponds to a stage in the WESTWARD migration. map 0:10
    1
  35.  @Non_auro_sed_ferro_recuperanda  If we make a direct comparison, Western Europeans are unlikely to be even in the top ten in proximity to the Yamnaya culture, as I said.
    1
  36.  @Non_auro_sed_ferro_recuperanda  I don't need to believe, I tell you 100%. Even trite due to the fact that in Eastern Europe there are populations that never came from Corded ceramics.
    1
  37.  @Non_auro_sed_ferro_recuperanda  It's even funny when you turn to Reich and then give up what he was talking about.
    1
  38.  @fcolucero8867  Yes, from literature fifteen years ago.
    1
  39. Alexander Blok - The Scythians. He also said that a ferocious Hun awaits you in the Urals. And today it is known that both are either one people or have formed their own identity.
    1
  40.  @peymannorouzi4165  So what? A linguistic connection does not mean that they are from the same ethnic, cultural or racial group.
    1
  41.  @peymannorouzi4165  I have bad news for you.
    1
  42. ​ @user-yt3xd2jl6d  Mostly classic brunettes and brown hair. In the atlas of the Russian Empire by Robert Sears says that Italian, or Greek artists could draw inspiration for their sculptures there. True, he did not praise women, because they were forbidden to work, they dressed up in many fabrics, jewelry, etc., and led a relaxed destructive lifestyle. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0bEPlbkPnD8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fmh_VRgkgpo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Va5ImPuq6wg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fTXrO7C1OWs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tE_7HeBZgYE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fpSzK3Rbk_o https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wTnWRdaksfE
    1
  43. hogweed is a mistake of Soviet biologists of breeders who calculated to get cheap feed for cows, but received poisonous ivy. nothing to do with the Scythians. and the Scythians are the proto-Tatar people.
    1
  44. You are not a descendant of the hallstatt, but a degenerate from the trash heap.
    1
  45. Proto IE is a prehistoric South Volga horse breeders. Then they mixed with the Dnieper locals and formed IE. These groups were or were not connected with IE because the dna is distributed unevenly. That's where the Europeans came from. Volga core horse breeders spread to Siberia, where they mixed with ANE and Paleo-Siberian ancestry and by the Iron Age formed classic nomadic cultures aka proto-Tatar - Scythians, Sarmatians, Huns.
    1
  46.  @mikakev1  It's not. Lviv, Ivano-Frankivsk is the far-west of Ukraine. Former Polish lands under their Polish panas. They are not related to the east of Ukraine. In reality, they look like Romanian gypsies. Google Hutsuls and other vuiki. There is no relation to the Udmurts and other Finno-Ugric peoples. In addition, they are the most cruel Russophobes. In addition, there in the west of Ukraine was the Jewish Pale of Settlement in the Russian Empire. They were forbidden to settle east. It is there that the roots of ukro-nationalism sprout. They use the names of the Udmurts or Mordvinians as a kind of lower race in relation to them. They call them Androphages - cannibals. From this mixture of hatred of Russophobia, Polish domination and Jews comes their current banderites tribe. However, the skin lightness index is higher in the east. The Volga-Finnic peoples are beautiful people with their own culture, cousins ​ ​ of the Volga-Altaic nomads. No Galizia. Tatar traditional festival in Mordovia https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ayzOz2hHhuA&t=9s
    1
  47. t's not. Lviv, Ivano-Frankivsk is the far-west of Ukraine. Former Polish lands under their Polish panas. They are not related to the east of Ukraine. In reality, they look like Romanian gypsies. Google Hutsuls and other vuiki. There is no relation to the Udmurts and other Finno-Ugric peoples. In addition, they are the most cruel Russophobes. In addition, there in the west of Ukraine was the Jewish Pale of Settlement in the Russian Empire. They were forbidden to settle east. It is there that the roots of ukro-nationalism sprout. They use the names of the Udmurts or Mordvinians as a kind of lower race in relation to them. They call them Androphages. From this mixture of hatred, Russophobia, Polish domination and Jews comes their current banderites tribe. However, the skin lightness index is higher in the east. The Volga-Finnic peoples are beautiful people with their own culture, cousins ​ ​ of the Volga-Altaic nomads. No Galizia. Tatar traditional festival in Mordovia https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ayzOz2hHhuA&t=9s
    1
  48.  @LuisAldamiz  You're wrong. Early western Xiongnu are descended from the same sources as their neighbors, i.e. Paleo-Siberian-Eurasian. Eastern Xiongnu from Slab Grave. But closer to the Avar period, the Slab Grave component began to prevail, which replaced the Siberians. That is why the Pazyryk Scythians were Turkic-speaking.
    1
  49.  @LuisAldamiz  And if you have been reading magazines and blogging for ten years, then you should understand that three haplogroup samples say nothing about the population. Even 100 samples are not enough to say anything about the population. Moreover, if three are published, then this does not mean that there were no others. Simply, for modern autosomal data is no longer required. So you wasted ten years? Why then did I newcomer take care of what to find out? They are not mixed, early Scythians evolved from the amalgamation of early pastoralists and the Paleo-Siberian population. On the Asian pedigree, they are close to the Baikal and Yenisei hunter-gatherers, not far-eastern Amur hunter-gatherers as modern Turks and Mongols. Xiongnu is a separate big topic. In addition, I did not say anything about the Central Asian Turks, I spoke about the Volga-Altaic cluster, which of course is related to the Uralic. Even the author of the channel did not say anything about them in his lecture.
    1
  50.  @LuisAldamiz  If you look globally at the map, as I understand it, this West Siberian hunter-gatherer was located between the Paleo-American in the east and the historical Okunev culture in the west, if more widely that intermediate link from the Upper Paleolithic between East Asian and Indo-European. Afonasyevo is certainly good, but in the Bronze Age there already lived Dzungarian pastoralists who were Afonsyevo + ANE + Baikal. And in the end, Andronovo still came there. For a complete mess. I try to read about autosomal data, because it is always interesting and nothing is clear.
    1
  51.  @عليياسر-ف4ن9ك  Go home Arab. Help yourself to raising IQ.
    1
  52.  @lineage13  not
    1
  53.  @lineage13  ANE means Ancient North Eurasian. It's not East Asian.
    1
  54.  @lineage13  This is Mongoloid, like a Native American.
    1
  55.  @alwaysright3943  They are sandy near-eastern Indo-gypsies. Nothing to do with nomads.
    1
  56. Maybe from other side like? Steppe ancestry in DNA admixtures Volga Tatars former nomadic ppl - Cimmerians, Karasuk _ BA, Zhevakinsky _ BA, Andronovo _ MLBA, Sinashta _ MLBA, Hun _ Early Arpad commoners, Alans, Sarmatians Ural. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-XZoVzu3LE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qB8_ro_moMc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XpUxLBpEi6s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6Wri8odPaE
    1
  57. The last of their tribe 3:50 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nW0gKVDz9tc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8UPsOERtBM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k69R1PepXCo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ThS9QRXByzc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=joKmybML950 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B-Uc_3k-eFs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sK0Tho0wgxw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NNKSX-7raxY&t=3s
    1
  58.  @rb98769  Brown concept relative to something. We have paleo DNA from Karsuk culture - oldest metallurgical province in Siberia,mixture Yamna, Paleo-Siberian, ANE Then Zevakino-Chilikta, Cimmerians, Sarmatians etc who spread from Siberia. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mnAhS-hKOic https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NCCr_rfmUXU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fmh_VRgkgpo
    1
  59. Сheck dna presentation on Afonasievo and Yamnaya cultures. Determine the average statistical between Neolithic, Bronze Age and K13 grafs. Let's say the first three top encountered populations will have the closest relationship.
    1
  60.  @volkerr.  Non Slav Russians are the last of the Mohicans. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kFPoLueqDN4&t=208s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NJzJdEYRn2w Volga Tatars - European HG 45,4 %, Anatolian neolitic farmer 34 %, Amur River HG 10.8%, Caucasus HG 7.6%, Yellow River Neolitic Farmer 2.2%, - MDA_Cimmerian cim358, MDA_Cimmerian cim357, Karasuk_BA, Zevakinsky_BA Zevakino-Chilikta, Andronovo_MLBA_Potroshilovo, Andronovo_MLBA_Orak, Andronovo_MLBA_Ust-Bir, Sintashta_MLBA (contaminated), Sintashta_MLBA, Hun_early Arpadian commoner, Sintashta_MLBA_O2, Andronovo_MLBA_Orak_O, Steppe_Maykop, Kubano-Tersk_Late, Rus_Alans_MA, Rus_Anapa_MA, Sarmatian South Ural and close to early Hun Arpadian commoners, Volga (Iron Age), Cimmerians. Bashkirs - European HG 30%, Baikal HG 25.6%, Anatolian neolitic farmer 16.6%, East Siberian HG 9%, Caucasus HG 7.6%, Yellow River Neolitic Farmer 6.2%, Zagros Neolitic Farmer 5% - Onogundur, Saka (Central Steppe), Scythians (Pazyryk culture), Xionite, Western Turk (Central steppe), Sargat culture, Tocharian (Tarim basin) and close to Siberian Tatars Chuvashs - European HG 45%, Anatolian neolitic farmer 27.2%, East Siberian HG 17%, Caucasus HG 7.0%, Yellow River Neolitic Farmer 3.8% - Saami (Iron Age), Volga Finns (Iron Age), Tagar culture, Sargat culture, Karasuk culture, Cimmerian, Saka (Tian Shan), Wusun. and close to Besermyan, Udmurt.
    1
  61.  @x2y3a1j5  The author is not going to say that there are Celts in Russia. He wants to talk about the Udmurts, who are quite red. And investigate Celtic links to the Scythians. Since the Budins maybe were described as redheads. And also because studies have proven that the last real descendants of the Scythians and Sarmatians are a group of Kipchak (Tatar) languages. Which are also neighbors of the Udmurts of the steppe line. Slavs themselves are not very interesting. There are a million videos about them. But, the small nations behind this seem to never exist, although they have their own deep culture. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0bEPlbkPnD8&t=183s
    1
  62.  @patrickmcelligott5646  welcome.
    1
  63.  @michaelfritts6249  At least a series of skulls of the Golden Horde population showed that in total they were closest to the Pazyryk (Asian Saka). And although the Tatars are not so much connected with the Golden Horde as with earlier cattle breeders, of course there were no blacks there, but at least Tom Hanks actually looks quite Tatar. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=osRscWKhu_g
    1
  64.  @michaelfritts6249  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=osRscWKhu_g&t=706s
    1
  65.  @michaelfritts6249  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=osRscWKhu_g&t=706s
    1
  66.  @alfonsfalkhayn8950  Yes, white skin from Siberia is unlike Europeans. Siberians, Finno-Ugric, Turkic, as well as other far-eastern Asians like the Japanese and Koreans have this trait.
    1
  67. The combination of blonde hair and blue eyes is a post-Mesolithic phenomenon in northern Europe, when eastern HG from Siberia began to mate with western HGs. That is why the largest number of blondes in the world live in the region of Finland and Estonia.
    1
  68. Udmurts are closely related to ANE.
    1
  69.  @antoniotorcoli5740  Maybe 30% nomads in those days had shades of hair, obviously no more. Tatar phenotype is mainly specific southern steppe europoid 6:29 with a additional of the north, uralide and mongoloid influence. Although there are many multi-colored hair today, especially among the younger generation. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UY1fq6Zm8eE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jMebVyRk1v8
    1
  70.  @dude7127  I don't understand what this comment is for?
    1
  71.  @dude7127  That's not what I said. I said that the Tatar phenotype is southern Europeoid (information for those who write before reading 6:28) with various influences. In addition, I know without you what the Tatars look like.
    1
  72.  @dude7127  Well, at least now you know that the Tatars are southern Europoids, who by default are generally brunette, since you do not understand the context in which I said something, and then you could not return and understand this context.
    1
  73.  @dude7127  Tatars do not come from Europe, it is not the same as Scandinavians. Tatar appearance from time immemorial southern Europoids I twice explained why. You yourself took the last line and took my words out of context and now you yourself tell me how it seems to you. But I don't think so. I know what I mean without you.
    1
  74.  @hjrsoft  Tarim's mummies may disagree with you.
    1
  75.  @hjrsoft  And what was their hair color?
    1
  76.  @hjrsoft  They all had reddish, brown, auburn hair.
    1
  77.  @hjrsoft  no all reddish like hell.
    1
  78.  @hjrsoft  You can find paper in Nature magazine about Tocharians, but an easy way to go to the wiki Tarim mummies
    1
  79. Because the haplogroup, this is just a conditional name for the mutation of the sexual chromosome, it does not provide useful information. Haplogroup is only 2% of DNA, while modern research is carried out on 500 thousand markers. Having 89% is not good and does not mean that they are related to the yamnaya.
    1
  80.  @serkankinden5150  They are IE. Sintashta is not Indo-European, but Indo-Iranian.
    1
  81.  @serkankinden5150  But you are not engaged in linguistics, but you go through specialized channels and put forward crazy ideas.
    1
  82.  @serkankinden5150  So, you started with misconceptions when you decided that haplogroups have some meaning. Moreover, began to attribute them to some ethnic groups when they formed, for example, 20 thousand years ago.
    1
  83.  @serkankinden5150  therefore, autosomes are used.
    1
  84.  @kevinmcniff487  What failure? If European HG lived in a rainy and grey climate but Paleo-North Asian lived in permafrost?
    1
  85. Their horse was a descendant of the ancient Tarpans. Small as a pony. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UKTUOtOyyLE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rnaAF5GYnwk
    1
  86. white skin from East Asia. it's a common condition there.
    1
  87. A delightful story.
    1
  88.  @LawrenceMclean  For horse lords, was used term Turan. Turan not Iran. Aryans are Iranian farmers who were raided.
    1
  89. ​@Leontemplar-yt6ff "Iranian stock" are a near-eastern arabic populations. And here, at best, "Iranic" spoke the pra-proto-language. There is no special relationship here.
    1
  90. @Leontemplar-yt6ff I did not say that the dates aligh with the Bell Beaker. I said that the Scyths shared a common ancestry with Euro, not Persians.
    1
  91. @Leontemplar-yt6ffI have no problem with Britannica. Pastoralists were in Siberia long before the existence of bell beaker. 3700-2500 BC 1:12. In at least half of the pedigree, the Scythians already had proto-europoid anthropology.
    1
  92. No. Native Urals and steppes have fairly light skin.
    1
  93. they never did.
    1
  94.  @joeuoe1998  nonsense. they were never even there.
    1
  95.  @joeuoe1998  There is not a single paper that would prove any mass movement. There is not a single study where there would be any data that one of them is related to sarmatians. Moreover, sarmatians are well known. They're not even blonde.
    1
  96.  @joeuoe1998  There is not a single paper that would prove any mass movement. There is not a single study where there would be any data that one of them is related to sarmatians. Moreover, sarmatians are well known. They're not even blonde.
    1
  97.  @nicholaskazan275  You were just illegally given a certificate, that's the problem. But, the spread of the Kipchak language is perfectly traced. What a historian, such a certificate. LOL Typical of the Pazyrykites, the craniological complex of characters has a certain resemblance to the modern South Siberian race, but is more Caucasoid. It is characterized by a mesobrachicrous, medium-sized braincase and a tall, broad, medium-sized face with a medium-protruding nose. The formation of this type occurs on the territory of Gorny Altai in the Bronze Age, as a result of a mixture of two morphological variants - dolichocrane Caucasoid, with a high and wide face, and brachicran, with moderately pronounced Mongoloid features and a low face. The ratio of initial components in different local groups of the Pazyryk population varies - the Caucasian type in an unmixed form is most often found in the regions of the South-West and Central Altai, and the proportion of the brachican Mongoloid component with a relatively low face is higher among the population of the northern, peripheral, part of the Pazyryk range. Summarizing the results of the study, the following conclusions can be drawn: modern populations of the North Altai anthropological type, which include the northern Altai, Teleuts, mountain Shors, as well as the late Baraba Tatars, are descendants of the carriers of the Pazyryk culture. In its most "pure" form, the craniological complex characteristic of the descendants of the Pazyryks is preserved among the Teleuts and Baraba Tatars (Khakanate of Sibir). The Bashkirs of Mavlyutovo also have a similar craniotype. Moreover, the western Tatars (Bulgar-Kipchak, Bulgar and Kazan Khakanates) have the first place of the Neolithic Indo-Europeans 60-80% of the DNA of the Bronze Age of the steppe + 20-30% of the Altai Bulan-Koba/Pazyryk.
    1
  98.  @nicholaskazan275  All Scythian cultures of the eastern horizon, such as Tagar and Pazyryk, came from the amolgamation of IE and the Paleo-Siberian population. At least 20%, and the Pazyryk 40-50% DNA. Go get an education.
    1
  99.  @nicholaskazan275  Yakuts are not Kipchak language and even not Altayans. You're a liar.
    1
  100.  @nicholaskazan275  It shows your IQ. When there are no arguments, you turn to insults, on ethnic grounds.
    1
  101.  @justperson7551  And Kipchak are Indo-Europeans.
    1
  102.  @justperson7551  What does science not confirm? It is worth noting that the confederation was located exactly in the same place as the early Saka.
    1
  103.  @justperson7551  And I just copied what has long been written in the wiki.
    1
  104.  @justperson7551  Ahah. Where is it written that they are not IE? What kind of study are you talking about?
    1
  105.  @LMO-f8p  without me there are any publications
    1
  106.  @LMO-f8p  Without me there are any publications within the past 20 years.
    1
  107.  @LMO-f8p  It was just a copypasta from wiki. A musical ensemble of enthusiasts who restore the old traditional musical sound of the Kipchak Tatar language (i.e. steppe North Asian, from the video on this channel) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hCaH89HATt4&t=198s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3Z2P_bitDk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FbJzfaOZqcg
    1
  108.  @TheEggmaniac  doubtful. the farmer certainly had brown eyes. In steppe people, at best, swamp, or amber. It is reliable that steppe in Asia could have 10-15% whg. but for Europe at least 30%, for the Baltic even 50% is more plausible. this can even be verified by a rough comparison.
    1
  109. proto-Balto Slavs at that time were primitive Baltic swamp aborigines.
    1