Comments by "bruh bruh" (@bruhbruh-us6gl) on "RealLifeLore" channel.

TLDR: the Dutch caused the population boom
2
I’ve always wondered; Are the people in Ceuta mostly Spanish or Mostly morrocan?
2
@kringle7804 Good. I don’t want people to go to these areas. Either live in a rural area or live in a city. Suburbs have absolutely raped the region where I live
1
@kringle7804 They’re a stepping stone in the sense that they’re the worst of both worlds. You get the overcrowding, congestion, and destruction of the environment you get in urban areas, along with generally ugly scenery, and the lack of easily accessible goods and services that you get in rural areas.
1
@kringle7804 Unless you want to completely redefine what a Suburb is, the problems with Suburbs are intrinsic in their nature. Sure, some suburbs are better than others, but they all have similar problems to varying degrees.
1
@kringle7804 No, Suburbs in particular have severe ingrained issues.
1
@kringle7804 It does, actually. The Suburb only exists because of the car, and the point of the Suburb is to be away from the cities. They are a modern invention.
1
@fateless3239 He’s God. He gave you life, and thus has the authority and ability to take it away if he so chooses.
1
@elmolovesyou2320 God gave you life, and thus has the authority to take it away.
1
@Me literally how
1
@fateless3239 So it’s immoral to take back something that belongs to you? God owes you nothing.
1
@fateless3239 No person should own another person, but God is above human beings. Besides, God not only made you, but paid for you on the cross. If you don’t believe me, read the lab reports of partially transubstantiated consecrated hosts.
1
@fateless3239 It’s kind of self-explanatory, isn’t it? God is perfect and all-powerful, perfectly merciful and perfectly just. Humans are none of these things, and we’re created and are sustained by God.
1
@fateless3239 Neither of those two things makes any sense. Your first statement is self contradictory, and as for your second, judgement of a perfect person would yield nothing. It’d be like putting an innocent person on trial, at best it would be unnecessary and at worst, cruel and unjust.
1
@fateless3239 Ah, now we’re speaking on moral terms. I thought you were implying that there is no such thing as perfection in general. You’re actually completely correct, there is no objective morality given a secular worldview, but the issue is that we don’t live in a secular world. Moreover, this is why the most brutal regimes of the 20th century, and even of all time, were all secular, or even anti-theistic in many cases. You want to judge God? Judge His enemies first.
1
@fateless3239 Lmao, don’t you see the contradiction here? You don’t believe in morality, but you’re going to lecture God about it? Again, God can take the life of whoever he pleases, and you may not like that, but it makes complete sense. Now, He is a good and merciful God, but he is also a just God. And His existence is undeniable.
1
@Me He does, and it has been scientifically proven
1
@fateless3239 If morality exists, then it must be objective, or it is not morality by definition. And why don’t you believe in God? It is undeniable that He exists, if you know the relevant information.
1
@fateless3239 If you define “morality” as a set of agreed upon standards, then you’re right, but when the vast majority of people speak of morality, they’re talking about right and wrong in objective terms. If morality means the former rather than the latter, then it doesn’t matter what anyone’s opinion on morality is, because there is no such thing as right or wrong in a purely material world. But, because we don’t live in a purely material world, most human beings can recognize whether something is good or bad.
1
@Me We looked for God in the Physical world, we found Him in the Eucharist. There are 153 cases of the Host becoming literal flesh and blood, ranging from around 600 AD to 2018. If a single one of these cases is true, then God is real. Please do your own research on Eucharistic miracles.
1
@Me I don’t think you understand what I’m telling you. Throughout history, and even In modern times, there are cases of consecrated hosts that become actual flesh and blood. They have been tested in labs, and it actually becomes real human tissue and blood. Look up Eucharistic miracles.
1
@Me What do you mean the Eucharist doesn’t exist? It is offered daily in every Catholic Church in the world. And no, it wasn’t already flesh and blood, because before it was a piece of unleavened bread.
1
@fateless3239 The world is material, but everything on it has a metaphysical dimension to it. How to prove it? Simple, God is real.
1
@Me If you actually did your research on the topic you would understand why that isn’t the case. The flesh and blood became interwoven with the bread in a way that is impossible to recreate. In every case, it was confirmed to be human heart tissue, and had the blood type AB+. I’m going to ask you a question, are you open to the possibility of God being real if you saw enough evidence? Because this is definitive undeniable evidence that Jesus Christ is the Son of God and that he suffered on the cross for your mistakes.
1
@fateless3239 Look up and study Eucharistic miracles. They are definitive proof that God is real, confirmed by secular scientific experts. You cannot debunk them.
1
@Me You really don’t know anything, do you? The event I’m describing has happened 153 times, and the latest event was less than 4 years ago. In every case, the blood type was the same, the genetic code was the same, the type of muscle was the same, etc. You don’t want God to be real, because you know that you’re in trouble is He is.
1
@Me Wikipedia is far from the only source of information on these events. You can look for the WHO official lab reports, of which there are many, you could look at reports from government employees who had to document it all, and that’s besides the first-hand accounts of the people there. God is the reason you have life. If He wanted, he could simply stop giving you life and you would die. I can’t tell Him to do anything though, that is up to Him.
1
The thing about Dallas isn’t that it’s crowded, but it just sprawled all over the surrounding towns due to suburbs. My town used to be fairly isolated, now there’s too many cars on the roads at all times and developers have ruined the land
1
@scottabc72 Forgetting that population growth is exponential and not linear
1
@scottabc72 Dutch basically created the conditions for population growth
1
@scottabc72 Not true, the Dutch government started programs during the early 1900’s and 1910’s whose aim it was train as many native Indonesians to perform basic medical roles, which caused an overall improvement in living standards
1
@Zestyclose-Big3127 There is a 70-year gap between Belgium becoming independent and the start of the period which had the greatest population growth
1
@scottabc72 No they weren’t.
1
@fluffycoffee3465 Thank you
1
I’m from North Texas. The problem is not that people aren’t staying in their towns, it’s that too many people from out of state are coming here. On top of that, these real estate developers are ruining the land and overwhelming towns with insane suburban sprawl. It’s horrible.
1
Talking about North Korea, a communist dictatorship >It’s like nazi Germany Bruh
1
@baltasarmelchor935 Black people
1
You ought to thank them, more like.
1
@brunol.2709 You want services? Go to the cities. That’s what they’re for.
1