Comments by "" (@ABCBCNM) on "Is Ukraine running out of soldiers?" video.

  1. How many of them are women and children? How many already returned ?
    5
  2. What's the basis (not laughable) of the 400 claim? Voluntarily conscripting ?
    4
  3. But, but didn't they have biolabs?
    4
  4. Reported where ? In a satire magazine ?
    4
  5. That's the bottom line.
    4
  6. We have seen that unsustainable Ukraine all the year long and some more months.😅
    3
  7. Speaking Russian doesn't make you pro-Russia, in many videos you can see / hear Ukrainian soldiers communicating in Russian and fiercely fighting Russian invaders.
    3
  8. 444,000,000 kkk KKK MMM NNN OOO 😮
    3
  9. What's your source? 'Sputnik'?
    3
  10. What are the actual figures, according to you ?
    3
  11. Russia isn't military alliance.
    3
  12. Mistakenly.
    3
  13. Another one ​444,000,000 kkk KKK MMM NNN OOO 😮
    3
  14. Russia did outshell long time ago, Other your points are as relevant as the first one
    3
  15.  @livingtribunal4110  Far less AFU?? And is this why the counterattacking Russian soldiers don't get artillery cover, so they perish in vain? Do you think himars, scalp/stormshadow, marine drones are "lol" for them? Could you bring your sources pls?
    3
  16. ​ @livingtribunal4110 Well... ok, these are your sources. Could you quote any maintaining the claim you mentioned? Title, date, author/s...?
    3
  17. Stressed economies? Where is it from? "Sputnik" TV? Which country refused support ? Buying Russian products with capped price is not refusing Ukraine support. And another one 444,000,000 kkk KKK MMM NNN OOO
    3
  18. Wow, Russian (or Iranian?) drones hit 300 targets. How many targets did Ukrainian drones destroy/hit?
    2
  19. I agree with your last sentence, however I don't agree with the others. What's the basis to claim Russia always has more firepower?
    2
  20. You wrote "had , has and will have" as if you meant "eternally" As long as "had" is true, the second is not, and last doesn't look to be (what would make you think it would?) Russian artillery fires more shells because it's mostly not precise (few Krasnopols), but its effect isn't on par (lacking infantry support, losing counter battery fire, actually , problems with ammunition supply) Aviation- yes , many more aircraft , but they don't make proportional big difference. Equally you could say - Russian navy is much much bigger, but despite of that it operates very cautiously because it's being hit now and then.
    2
  21. When Apocalypse?
    2
  22. Stream of weapons is drying? What are you taking about ? Hundreds of Soviet-era tanks ? It looks you cannot take Ukraine's initiative.
    2
  23. Sustaining the war is difficult indeed, but not because of the numbers (you stretch). The course of this war shows Ukrainians are tough.
    2
  24.  @ruaplikator  Tell this to the Ukrainians.
    2
  25.  @ruaplikator  Someone?  You are the someone.
    2
  26. Leaving your numbers aside Why is Russia doing the same ? It's a war.
    2
  27. What makes you trust sources that eg since day one of invasion were announcing Ukrainian defeat, despite what was going on the battlefields? Or - Russia indeed has some of those weapons and systems (not in all has advantage) - but the circumstances show Russia 😅don't know how to use them and/or they are being countered effectively.
    2
  28. Any source ?
    2
  29. Where is president Putin ? BTW, how is M.I.S. complex profiting? when the weapons sent are older, retired versions, those that would have to be scrapped or *even utilized?
    2
  30.  @arnsteinholm7372  You haven't answer my question.
    2
  31. Would you provide data, what percentage are these? eg I think it's mostly women who left.
    2
  32. ​ @NeoBTK Problems to take ​@tiortedrootsky 's irony ? btw, It looks you don't watch even Fox tv. 444,000,000 kkk KKK MMM NNN OOO 😢
    2
  33. Much, I suppose, but Ukraine gets allies' aid.
    2
  34. I see yesterday the number suggested was 400,000 today 500,000 😮
    2
  35. Your source ? Not 'RussiaToday' please
    2
  36. It's not about tin soldiers that go one for one. All male population cannot go to the frontline, even in 100% war oriented circumstances you need actually more men at the rear to make it going (before strict war logistics there are the country's conditions, its industry etc) BTW What word do you call Putin?
    1
  37. What do you think the Russians will do? because so far it looks dejá vu (toutes proportionnes guardées)
    1
  38. ​ @johnmouton6875 How many already returned?
    1
  39.  @arnsteinholm7372  Are you answering my post(s) ?
    1
  40. Will president Putin answer for the killing, rapes, kidnapping of children ? If it was not for him ...
    1
  41. Have you asked yourself first about the desires if those who from the bunker throw their fellow Russians into the meat grinder ?
    1
  42. What's your take , pls ?
    1
  43.  @СерхиоБускетс-ф7я  Today it is 1,000,000 ( one million )
    1