Comments by "Xyz Same" (@xyzsame4081) on "BBC News" channel.

  1. 1
  2. 1
  3. 1
  4. 1
  5. 1
  6. 1
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. As Prof. Richard D. Wolff said*: Those who call the shots are not interested in educating the U.S. citizens anymore. Well, not in public, non-profit, cost-free institutions. They privot to Asia, incl. China. There they assume will be new engineers, the qualified employees, most of the future sales, revenue and profit will be made there For-profit colleges are a business model. That's fine. * paraphrased - Dr. Wolff commented on Kansas who had to cut public services due to loss of tax revenue. The wealthy in the state had gotten a generous tax cut. The expected (by the Republicans governing) economic boom and trickle down did not happen. So Monday is school-free to save costs and to give teachers the "opportunity" to get a part time job on Monday to make ends meet (at Walmart often). In case that both parents are working (or a single parent that works) it means paying for childcare for one (more) day. Childcare is for-profit and very expensive in the U.S. 4 day week equals: not one of the wealthy areas (their private schools kept the 5 days week). The 4 days areas might even be with a higher crime rate. As the saying goes: The devil has always work for idle hands. So if the children are old enough to stay at home alone w/o supervision of an adult - them watching TV and playing video games idly is the good scenario. If politics continues to work for the ruling class and the haves only, they will continue to PIT the WORKFORCE of those Asian countries AGAINST the workforce of the wealthy countries. They do not NEED those kids, certainly not as PERSONS with a well rounded education, self-confidence, and the ability for life-long learning. Well at least many of them will not be needed. They do not NEED those children ANYMORE as future qualified employees to leverage their workforce and make a profit. The children of the decision makers get a private good education of course - and good positions for them will be availabe. So WHY would they fund public education - it could end with them having to pay the higher tax rate like in the boom era after WW2. (That era of relatively high taxes for the higher income brackets that were PAID by all, even multinationals, lasted until the 1980 in the U.S.). Oklahoma maybe has lost a lot of industrial jobs (thanks Bill Clinton), farming is a struggle for many (China tariffs on U.S. agricultural products anyone ? Trump is right of course in SOME way - but any SHARP turn in international trade is highly disruptive.) A lot of the government funding for school happens on the local level (property taxes) so wealthy areas have better funded schools (as is appropirate for a society fracture along class lines). Plus the parents are under pressure to rise money (some schools raise as much as few hundredthousand USD yearly. That money helps the schools to offer better or more programs and facilities - of course ONLY in the WEALTHY areas. The booming economy at the coasts does not support the states with another economic model. (But then that would be redistribution of wealth like they do in the wealthy European countries for their poorer, less industrialized or more rural ares. That would border on communism.)
    1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1