Comments by "Xyz Same" (@xyzsame4081) on "Nine People Test Positive At School That Suspended Teens For Exposing Unsafe Conditions" video.

that is criminal .... but a good protest of parents and teachers. It will come anyway there will be mass break outs.
3
you should start a crusade against red traffic lights. It is is an infringement on your rights that you cannot drive whenever you want. Only to increase safety and make traffic function for everyone ....
2
9 identified cases. Check in one week, incl. in the famlies. - Remember when the U.S. had only 50 identified cases according to Trump. Might have been 20 times the number which is still tiny (1000 versus 330 millions) . - When Germany and France only had a few. and within 2 - 3 weeks they had more and more cases ....
1
Example: California, during a draught and heat wave. "But it's only a few small fires. Do we really need to watch like hawks that no one starts a fire, and restrict camping and outdoor cooking, and fine people that take risks with smoking cigarettes in the woods ? Isn't that ridiculous ? And the costs for restricting tourism, the inconvenience for campers and hikers, and the costs for the monitoring with drones, and the firefighters on alert all the time ...It's only a small fire, you can easily put it out when it happens. And then - how much damage can a small fire do ?"
1
If you think that is a bad example - check out the situation in Italy when they were about to officially introduce triage. - China dropped the ball, but then they jumped into action. Wuhan was secured by the military. They have mass graves in Iran. Which has a much younger population than the U.S. let alone European countries, so they should do better (well no the young will survive for the most part, but they have mulitgenerational households so they infect the elderly).
1
Did you factor in the 5 days average ! incubation time ? 2 weeks is not much. And under which rock have you been hiding since March, this isn't new info.
1
That is beyond the point, it is CONTAGIOUS. and sneaky since there are asymptomatic cases, especially young people and kids can spread it w/o even knowing that they are spreaders.
1
"Spreads like wildfire" easily beats "only 0,8 % of those who get it die". If you get MANY cases the many deaths and complications and hospital stays are an inevitable fallout. - the death rate of the normal flu is around 0,1 % so at least 8 times lower, and there are not nearly as many complications.
1
Remember the LAST PANDEMIC ? it was flu in 2009, no one closed down the economy or the schools. Why ? much lower death rate. Cynically speaking after 7 days people are already getting somewhat better. Most do not need the hospital. and certainly not the ICU for weeks. those who die will be dead after 7 days already and there are not nearly as many people that suffer long term damage.
1
Corona virus multiplies in your throat and it gets bad when they get into their lungs. RESPIRATORY ! - the problems with 5G nonwithstanding - that is nonsense, Corona virus grows IN cells, it is not a cell (but needs them to mulitply), and it does not grow under the skin but in the respiratory tract. Whereever you get your information from, it is not a good source. check out Dr. Mike Hansen, he is qualified in emergency care, pulmonary diseases and internal medicine.
1
I KNOW from data that in Austria 3,25 % of all identified cases DIE. Some of the survivors have spent weeks in the ICU. And others have of course long term damage. Austria is a country with a good healthcare system for all, paid sick leave (that includes time for quarantine) and they have a grip on the situation (unlike the U.S.). economy is open, tourists coming but they must test (and with restrictions and mask mandate was reintroduced). the testing is strategic contact testing, and some random testing (but also better than in the U.S.). But let's assume for every identified case (= "tested positive" most of course recover at home, or have no or little symptoms) there are 3 cases that go unnoticed. Which is a HIGH assumption, considering that the authorities do contact tracing, and testing and watch the situation like hawks. And that the population has paid sick leave, that legal restrictions restict firing of sick workers (not only during corona times) and that they get testing and treatment free at the point of service. 1 case identified and 3 are not found and the known number of "died FROM corona" (that is certified) - that lands you at 0,81 % instead of 3,25 % Dr. Fauci's estimate for the death rate is a little higher. 1 % that is 10 times higher than for flu. The U.S. has 330 million people. if 30 % get infected which is a low estimate if you let it run its course thats 99 million people infected . So in theory 990,000 people DIE. BUT: with that many cases the systems would be completely overwhelmed and then the death rates go up, not only for corona virus. Italy was there, the doctors already got the letters of how to handle triage, they were 2 - 3 days within officially ! using that. Triage is what they do in the war zone in the field hospitals when they decide who gets the help (the scarce resources) and whom they let die. with 30 % infected (and that could go fast) the deat toll would be much higher than 1 %. It is like a wildfire, you can put a lot of effort into putting out the little fires immediately (or monitor where you think they could start). Or you let the fire ravage the region (think the Spanish Flu in 1918 and 1919) or the Bubonic Plague. At some point a wildfire and a pandemic will end. The Spanish Flu also ended - after 50 million people (most were young under 40) had died. What you can't have is a mild fire and you live with it. a Wildfire Lite. It is a waste of resources to do a little bit prevention, that will not do you any good. Either go the full mile (see Europe, Australia, ...) or throw the hands up in the air and accept the terrible consequences.
1
SARS-CoV-1 from 2002/2003 did not cause a pandemic (it was a close call, it mainly hit Asia, the virus is now extinct). In 2013 (I think) another corona virus switched from animals to humans, and they got sick. Severely - it has a death rate of 30 % even with modern medicine (that's MERS Middle East Respiratory Syndrome. the flu does not attack your lung but the corona viri that cause MERS / SARS do. Or the massive reaction of the immune system). So yes, MERS with the very high death rate is very different to the lower death rate of CoVid-19 (caused by SARS-CoV-2) - factor 30 - or the even lower death rate of the flu. You have to know the context when you quote Dr. Fauci as published in the New England Journal of Medicine. But CoVid-19 is sadly also more contagious than the flu (MERS is the least contagious, and we are lucky that that is the case). MERS (2013) - not only can the virus infect persons that handle animals (camels, dromedars), it also became contagious between humans. Now the disease was called MERS (Middle East Respiratory Syndrome) because it orginates from the Arab Penninsula and luckily although it can be passed on between humans it is not very contagious. Which is a good thing because if you got it, you are in real trouble. Modern hygiene CAN contain it well. (the spreading, for the patients they can try intense care). You bet Dr. Fauci would rather deal with that, the individuals are unlucky but it is much easier to protect society from that. The outbreak of 2013 was quickly contained, there are cases here and there so the virus exists in the wild. So far no problem. The less cases the less chances it will mutate. god help us if it would became more contagious will remaining as lethal. For now we are good.
1
Right - out of 1000 infections only 2 persons age 10 - 18 will die, that is twice the flu mortality rate for ALL age groups (including the very old). Just to give some context. And some of the young people will have lasting damage. Which is rare for flu. As for spreading: the problem is that children and young people have often very light symptoms (and they recover easily in most cases). That makes them EXCELLENT SPREADERS. Children and teenagers connect the generations. The teachers are older than 18, and so are the parents. If you have good spreaders and enough cases you will get your death toll and overwhelmed hospitals. Even if most of the patients are over 18. "Spreads like wildfire" (with help of children) easily beats "death rate "only" ... 0,1 or 1 % - or whatever"
1
Tested positive (and the test is correct) = person can spread it. They may not be sick = having symptoms, but they are easily INFECTIVE. (nothing new here, many infections can be passed on and the person does not get it, think measles, and the person passing it on is vaccinated and immune) There is no doubt at all about that, and you are not correctly informed. persons can pass it on with or without symptoms, or BEFORE they get symptoms. A person may be almost over it and still test positive but is de facto not contagious anymore. But you cannot rely on that. (that glimmer over there could be a little fire, but maybe it is an optical illusion. Well, let's ignore it, if it is really a fire we are going to notice at some point ....) Yes, there is evidence that the asymptomatic cases do spread it, too. Now - a person with fully blown symptoms will normally shed more virus BUT they KNOW they are infectious, and the persons around them know it too. And that helps to prevent passing it on. The sneaky way of being passed on (by person with very light or no symptoms, or no symptoms YET) and the incubation time of 5 days (it can be longer 5 is the average) is one of the reasons the damn' thing is so contagious.
1
What has Bill Gates to do with it - I know he is supposedly engaged with vaccine research (which one of the many global projects ?) - so far the measures have nothing to do with him at all.
1
You realize that Biden is a Republican that finds it convenient to be pro abortion and pro gun regulation ? Biden a Socialist or Social Democrat ? don't we wish !
1
Making the vids longer than 10 minutes .... - you can open the automatic transcript and browse through it.
1
Nicola Sturgeon, eh ? - Such a shame that Corbyn isn't PM now. They would have set up the funding of the care homes and the NHS just in time.
1