Comments by "jeppen" (@jesan733) on "HistoryLegends"
channel.
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
"Also Javelins and Stingers after stocks run out: cricket noises"
Russia still can't use mechanised brigades, they just get destroyed. Ukraine has plenty anti-armor: mines, nlaws, javelins, at4, stugna-p, excalibur and more.
"Also adience after Ukrainian loses all bayraktars: cricket noises"
Sure, but Bayraktar did important work early on. And the song was epic!
"Also audience after Russians are adapting and shooting down HIMARS missiles: cricket noises"
Nah, Russians can't do much about them, but sadly the ammo is a bit scarce so Ukraine has to ration it and use only for really high-value targets. But it does still make Russian logistics far harder because they can't concentrate assets within range.
"Also audience after these missiles don't achieve more than 1 success because the Russians can outsmart them: cricket noises"
Yeah, Russia outsmarted Neptune by keeping far, far away in the Black Sea. HARM missiles are still good but for now, I guess the air dominance of the R-37 makes it hard for Ukraine to use them. But they did good work and still makes Russia deploy S-X00 further back, which is good. Other long-range missiles: Storm Shadow still does very good work.
"Gepard, NASAMS, Hawk, Patriot"
These are all good. They aren't being destroyed, they're shooting down almost everything Russia throws at Ukraine.
"Old western MRAPs, APCs, IFVs, MBTs, Also audience when Ukraine loses hundreds of these vehicles: cricket noises"
Well, those are destroyed in the hundreds in Russian propaganda only, as far as we know. Normal people understand that there are losses during offensives, but only captives of Russian propaganda jumps to conclusion based on very little evidence.
"See a pattern?"
Yeah, I see a very clear pattern in your bias.
2
-
2
-
2