Comments by "jeppen" (@jesan733) on "Russian Armored Columns STEAMROLL North of Avdiivka" video.

The Russian propaganda is a firehose of ... truth, let's say. Very credible.
48
@ТолмачевЛеонид that's right. It's just the typical lazy reality inversion of Russian propaganda. Russia's lancets are too weak, so they just mirror it and claim Ukraine's anti-armor shots are too weak. I've seen extreme amounts of Russian armor destroyed and the explosions are almost always unsurvivable.
14
@danielbwest emoji responses, showing off the typical maturity level of captives of Russian propaganda.
9
@carlgustafemilmannerheim9360 well, Ukraine has reported 200 russian tanks and 300 other armored vehicles destroyed in the last 14 days and I have no reason to doubt it.
5
@danielbwest haha, my mistake then!
3
@xShadowlurkex how could little Israel win over its neighbors? Egypts population was 32 million in 1967 and Israel was only 2.8 million.
3
If Russia is the best army and they have 3x the population and 10x the amount of equipment, how come they can't break through?
3
Perhaps the desperate ones are the ones using all caps?
2
@psixo the Kremlin call you "useful idi-ts".
2
Don't worry, he was just concern trolling. He's fully onboard with the Russian propaganda that you spout here.
2
@anthonygarcia6466 or 1 hit from an NLAW, or from an Excalibur.
2
@Clarence23rd cope harder.
2
@ПериметрПериметр go listen to Trump and "truth social". (It's like communist states having "democratic" in their official name.)
1
@bastikolaski8111 I'm serious, but of course, being serious in here is probably also trolling. What's a troll is context dependent.
1
@jamesgornall5731 nobody has said Russia has no tanks left. Its storages are pretty deep.
1
@jamesgornall5731 hundreds. When Oryx counted, they could verify roughly half visually from released material. That's good enough for me, makes sense that half isn't documented and released.
1
@eai180561 no, they didn't. But clearly now Russia has a shortage of missiles. I'm sure they're hoarding a bit now to try to terror bomb civilian infrastructure again this winter, but they've essentially depleted their old storages and now have to make do with what they can produce just-in-time.
1
@gilangputra7514 keep coping.
1
@gilangputra7514 "degrate"? No idea what that means. But dude, present an argument. Don't just say others are bad, that's worthless and just adds noise to the discussion.
1
@jamesgornall5731 seriously, do you expect me to have seen most of the Russian armor destruction? You should take your complaint to your fellow captives of Russian propaganda. If there are people who extrapolate from tiny and sketchy anecdotal evidence, it's them. But you know this, and this is just another reality inversion ploy from you guys.
1
@jamesgornall5731 also, Oryx are good, but of course you reject them. I expect nothing else from you. After all, Russian propaganda's primary objective is making people doubt and distrust everything.
1
@MarineScoutSniper keep coping.
1
@Warren_Peace "But they did say that the Russians are running out of tanks." Who are "they"? "There was even a story that majority of Russia's tanks were inoperational due to lack of maintenance..." If that was true, and Russia built up its refurbishment capacity, this may explain why more tanks have hit the streets now. "Ukrainian and Nato claims of tank and armored vehicles kills(about 5000+) are so exaggerated that they have now no explanation as to how the same exact units that were supposed to be "wiped out" still have decent amount of tanks to send to the field...." 5000 tanks and 10000 other armored vehicles, yes. Idk why you think that's exaggerated, or why it would mean Russia has no reserves. "The Military Balance 2021 database says Russian storage facilities have around 10,200 tanks, including various T-72s, 3,000 T-80s, and 200 T-90s. The database’s 2016 publication also indicates that Russia has roughly 2,800 Cold War legacy T-55s (the first tank type to feature a nuclear warfare protection system in the 1950s) in storage, as well as 2,500 T-62s and 2,000 T-64s. This means that Russia may have around 17,300 tanks produced between the late 1950s and now." 10,200 decently modern tanks and perhaps 4,000 killed (the rest being older) means Russia has only wasted 40% of them. Ukraine's reporting had a low in April with only 84 Russian tanks and 212 armored vehicles destroyed. The high is in October with 520 tanks and 820 armored vehicles. "Heck, even Ukraine had lost so many tanks that they mainly just send their infantry without armored support into Russian lines and just kept them in reserve...." Aren't you making the same error as you accuse "them" of doing: Looking at current battles and drawing conclusions on reserves? AFAIK, Ukraine has kept most of its armor in reserve since the current reality is that mines and anti-armor helicopters makes it very difficult to use tanks effectively. So they're working with infantry, drones and artillery for the time being, and will throw in armored pushes only when the conditions are right for breakthroughs.
1
@s7ven48 what are you talking about? Perhaps you're trying to make a joke, but you just make zero sense.
1
@scallen3841 what are you responding to, who are "they" and what do you mean with "won"?
1
@psixo it's the western term for a firehose of deliberate lies.
1
And Elvis is alive.
1
@Craig-fl8jj keep coping.
1
@luccamdr_xd2202 the Pentagon leaks and Oryx both show far, far higher casualties and equipment losses for Russia. If there was a 1-1 proportion, Ukraine would hardly keep fighting against a country with 4x as big population and 10x more equipment. Also, we have visual confirmation of Russian tanks throwing turrets 10s of metres into the air and Ukrainian tanks taking Lancet hits with crew surviving.
1
Falling for how? Russia is driving their stuff into a metal grinder. What's not to like?
1
@adi6293 well, it's easier to defend a city than fields, so if the enemy makes a strong push it's common that they make more headway on the fields surrounding the city..
1
@Guslik_rus Russians and their families say there is no rotation. And no wonder, because soldiers won't return, and they will tell how it is, hindering further mobilizations.
1
@luccamdr_xd2202 so the Russians didn't think NATO was a threat, and NATO hadn't given Ukraine adequate weaponry for defense before the war? I agree with you!
1
@Blobby192 "it comes down to be able to take a punch as well as give one." Well, Russian and Ukrainian commands have one thing in common: A disregard for the lives of Russian soldiers.
1