Comments by "jeppen" (@jesan733) on "Hindustan Times" channel.

  1.  @gayatribalapradhan8472  NATO doesn't threaten Russia. Even today, NATO ridiculously forbids Ukraine to use NATO weaponry to target Russian soil.
    3
  2.  @gayatribalapradhan8472  how old are you?
    3
  3.  @easygroove  no, Ukraine truly wants to defend itself and USA and the UK are assisting. Kokainski? Stop the immaturities.
    3
  4. So Putin should.
    3
  5. Poor Afghanis could win against the Soviet Union, but Ukraine is stronger than Afghanistan and Russia is weaker than the Soviet Union. So there is every indication Russia will lose this war.
    3
  6.  @M.Georgiev8527  and Kim Jong Un.
    3
  7.  @DIREWOLFx75  hi, why are you still a putinist troll? You said the same a year ago.
    2
  8.  @isupportthecurrentthing.1514  Russia attacked Donbass in 2014, not Ukraine. Please double check the propaganda you've been served.
    2
  9.  @JayJay-ki4mi  among mature people, pro-Ukrainians are in a huge majority. It's sad to see that a democracy like India doesn't take democracy seriously.
    2
  10. Nobody cares about your immature and evil takes. Zelensky is exactly what Ukraine needs and he's been a stellar leader so far.
    2
  11. Ruin indeed.
    2
  12.  @kkmishra99  "Do you know anything about IR??" Possibly, but I'm not sure what you mean by IR. Iran? "calling NATO doesn't threaten Russia is like calling ukraine a democracy." Ukraine is a democracy. In 2019, Zelensky won against a real incumbent opponent and power changed hands peacefully to him. That's the ultimate evidence of democracy, and it has NEVER ever happened in Russia, nor could it under the current regime. And yes, NATO doesn't threaten Russia. Russia had the largest amount of artillery in the world, and has the largest amount of nuclear warheads, so neither Ukraine nor NATO could threaten Russia. "Nato has advised the beggar to do so to avoid kyiv being radioactive." So here you contradict yourself. You say Ukraine/NATO can't attack Russia because it'd be nuked. The same would be true always, so a Ukrainian NATO membership could not ever threaten Russia.
    2
  13.  @amr8457  ok, so what's wrong with my reasoning? The Soviets lost to defending Afghanis. So why would Russia win against defending Ukrainians?
    2
  14.  @walterbrunswick  only in the Russian propaganda, not in real life. That's why others aren't crying about it. Shame to Russia.
    2
  15. Which god blesses aggression and war?
    2
  16. ​ @RubberTag Putin denazified Utkin! Have to give him that.
    2
  17. Almost all are Ukrainians, and there are no mercenaries on Ukraine's side, only volunteers. The Russian propaganda pretends they're mercenaries essentially to threaten them with war crimes (not respecting their Geneva convention rights).
    1
  18. Shut up, kid, this is serious business. We don't want your immaturity and moral stunting here.
    1
  19.  @MarkLee1  the problem with peace negotiations any deal would reward Putin and that he will just use the peace to build up a few years. Then Russia will restart the war to grab more territory.
    1
  20.  @winfriedbij684  uhm, no, he didn't. Like all the rest, he has always thought Russia would take Odessa in a month or two.
    1
  21. "Zelensky, Poroshenko, Merkel and Hollande admitted that Ukraine had no intention to honor the Minsk agreements." This is a Russian propaganda lie.
    1
  22.  @isupportthecurrentthing.1514  Russia is starting the wars. We just try to help neighbors defend themselves.
    1
  23.  @isupportthecurrentthing.1514  have you double-checked the facts and the sources you've used? If you do, you may find MSM was actually correct. Feel free to bounce those facts and sources against me, and see if I can help you double check.
    1
  24.  @isupportthecurrentthing.1514  Donbass is part of Ukraine. In 2014, Russian soldiers and wagnerites started attacking Ukraine (Donbass) as "little green men". Ukraine has been defending and trying to dislodge the occupiers ever since. I agree that we're going to need people like you to recognize and fact-check Russian propaganda to use our democracy to end this war by defeating Russia. Please look into it deeper and double-check sources and Russian propaganda narratives.
    1
  25.  @PerceivedREALITY999  Ukraine couldn't wait because yanukovich was a Russian puppet that had let slaughter many protestors. Elections were soon held again, so Ukraine maintained its democracy through the revolution.
    1
  26.  @isupportthecurrentthing.1514  your stance isn't plausible as an honest organic viewpoint. I can only conclude you're a bot account.
    1
  27.  @isupportthecurrentthing.1514  so Russia attacked Belgorod when they bombed incursions from Ukraine? Smart, dude.
    1
  28. ​ @isupportthecurrentthing.1514  not only is the stance a reproduction of false Russian propaganda narratives, it also contains hilariously backwards moral claims. I guess it's possible to be that contrarian and post-truth, but again, it's not really plausible. Therefore my conclusion is bot.
    1
  29.  @isupportthecurrentthing.1514  you're so obviously taking the side of Russia. Nobody can read these comments and think otherwise.
    1
  30.  @isupportthecurrentthing.1514  again, your stances aren't plausible, nor honest. Bot.
    1
  31.  @isupportthecurrentthing.1514  in fact, the primary goal of Russian propaganda is to convince people that democratic institutions and politicians are just as bad or corrupt as those in dictatorships. That way, apathy, inaction and isolationism helps dictatorships maintain power at home and assert themselves abroad. Therefore, the act of not taking "sides between corrupt political super powers" is in itself taking Russia's side. But of course that's not all you do. You clearly take Russia's side in historical narratives, inverting blame for the war and more.
    1
  32.  @isupportthecurrentthing.1514  in fact, the primary goal of Russian propaganda is to convince people that democratic institutions and politicians are just as bad or corrupt as those in dictatorships.
    1
  33.  @isupportthecurrentthing.1514  that statement in itself takes the side of Russia. The primary goal of its propaganda is to convince us that we're bad, as bad as they are.
    1
  34.  @isupportthecurrentthing.1514  that's exactly what Russia wants with its propaganda though: "We're as bad as them, let's just have peace on their terms."
    1
  35.  @isupportthecurrentthing.1514  can't reply anymore, too hard moderation.
    1
  36.  @isupportthecurrentthing.1514  you should say "team mir".
    1
  37. The Revolution of Dignity was not a coup, it was a popular revolution. In no way did Putin need to launch a war regardless.
    1
  38. Don't be evil, please.
    1
  39.  @michaeluhrmann9347  aren't you the clown, with all your emojis and immature takes?
    1
  40.  @groundworkcivils7506  dude, he tried to negotiate, he was elected on a make-peace-with-Russia political platform, but Putin had already decided to invade and annex Ukraine. Your bribe nonsense sounds like a particularly bad conspiracy theory made in Russia.
    1
  41.  @somekindaguy100  I agree with Bewlay Brother. My guess is that you have just soaked up the Russian propaganda motivations for this illegal, brutal and unnecessary war?
    1
  42.  @kkmishra99  thanks for the suggestion. I did read the wikipedia summary, but I don't think I'll read the book. Interesting, but sounds like outdated and unrealistic thinking not really worth my time. Still if you're right, then Russia may need to not only be demilitarized but also de-duginized.
    1
  43.  @daremasterco7321  do you have any counter-arguments to my clearly laid-out reasons for Ukraine being a democracy? Mere ridicule long after the thread has died is pretty worthless.
    1
  44.  @MrLeadb1  there was no coup in 2014, just a popular revolution. Revolutions in Ukraine is none of Russia's business, and besides, two democratic elections have passed since the revolution, so the revolution was irrelevant in 2022.
    1
  45.  @pmp2559  no, a coup is made by a small number of regime insiders. A popular revolution is when hundreds of thousands in the streets overwhelm the government. 2014 clearly was the latter. It was only a "coup" in the Russian propaganda. They cook a huge amount of soup out of a leak where Nuland tried to coach the outcome a bit, but in no way does that leak prove that the US engineered or commanded the revolution.
    1
  46.  @honselronquillo3654  don't blame others, don't deny your own agency. You weren't swindled, you did what you wanted to do. And please realize that whatever happened in Philippines in 1986 has no bearing to Ukraine in 2014 or later. Zelensky came to power in 2019 on a peace platform, and this could not have been predicted during the revolution of 2014. He would have negotiated peace with Putin, giving up Crimea, if Putin had just been reasonable and willing. But Putin had made up his mind to invade, he had planned it for many years, so he just acted increasingly adverserially, and thus Zelensky was unable to deliver on his election platform.
    1
  47.  @hejdiklump  if Putin thinks he's Adolf.
    1
  48.  @alexlo7708  they don't want Russia warring on Ukrainian soil. Can't fault the defenders.
    1
  49.  @alexlo7708  btw, Putin has several children with the gymnast.
    1
  50.  @alexlo7708  its not happening and also none of their business.
    1