Comments by "jeppen" (@jesan733) on "Ukraine Can Now Strike Russia Direct || Peter Zeihan" video.

  1.  @AlphonseNouveau  so you're saying taxes on the poor can be balanced by the removal of taxes for the rich?
    3
  2. What actually happened? Russia made an angry gesture. So nothing.
    3
  3. It will.
    2
  4. You know what you should do? Follow someone who has had a long lucky streak in predictions, and as such is a virtual oracle. Then when his luck runs out, jump to the next one. There's always someone on a streak!
    2
  5.  @mickbeeee  UK just supplied a few dozen Storm Shadows (first delivery under Starmer). I think both ATACMS and Storm Shadow are in quite short supply unfortunately. I'm pretty convinced they'll keep using them for deep strikes though, but we'll see.
    2
  6. Why are you listening to that Russian propaganda show?
    1
  7. @gabrielorville5334  its much more common to make mistakes if one immerses oneself in lies and distortions than if not. The difference in range between atacms and the Russian medium range nuclear delivery missile can be found almost everywhere, so I'm unsure what the Russian propaganda channel added?
    1
  8.  @LRRPFco52  "Video was made before IRBM was launched with hypersonic MIRVs." I'm pretty sure that Russia made at least 10 other attacks that day that did more actual damage.
    1
  9.  @xanovaria  that wasn't meaningful.
    1
  10. Only Russian bots claim ATACMS is too complex for Ukrainians to operate. No normal human is dvmb enough to believe that. Punching in coordinates and learning to load missiles into ramps isn't hard.
    1
  11.  @GraeMatterz  nonsense propaganda. Ukraine can easily operate the atacms on its own.
    1
  12. @GraeMatterz  since then nuclear powers have experienced humiliating defeats many times without resorting to nuclear war.
    1
  13. "My understanding was the US supplies the missles, and provides the personnel to target/launch." If that's you "understanding", you're listening too much to Russian propaganda.
    1
  14.  @JH-jx1hs  I was sarcastic. Why not listen to the insights he brings, combine with other insights and your own judgement to make predictions instead of putting emphasis on his predictions.
    1
  15.  @JH-jx1hs  the absurdity of my original comment is plain enough for anyone to understand its sarcasm.
    1
  16. @JH-jx1hs  well, to me it was obviously humorous, but the proof is in the pudding I guess. So I agree I failed.
    1
  17. Desperate lies by Putin.
    1
  18. No, they aren't.
    1
  19.  @blackcatdungeonmastersfami5311  thanks for the propaganda, Ivan.
    1
  20.  @blackcatdungeonmastersfami5311  there was no Munich in October 2021, you're thinking February 2022, five days before the invasion, when it was well known that Russia would invade and Zelensky was bitter reflecting back on the Budapest Memorandum, and bitter that Ukraine is refused entry to NATO. But in no way did he say they would aquire nuclear weapons.
    1
  21.  @blackcatdungeonmastersfami5311  so after concretely amassing forces and assets for a full-scale invasion during 4 months, Ukraine makes a last-minute desperate plea including a very vague statement about nuclear weapons. And Putin, the nuclear sabre-rattler in-chief, "drew the logical conclusions" according to you, and is thus justified in launching the attack? How can you look yourself in the mirror?
    1
  22.  @blackcatdungeonmastersfami5311  no, Ukraine didn't. Jacques Baud is a Russian propagandist. The cope you relay is a face-saving operation after the embarrassingly failed SMO. The Russians did their very best after years of meticulous preparation and training.
    1
  23. @blackcatdungeonmastersfami5311  he's a very well known Russian propagandist. It's easy to make completely misleading books with lots of references. Russia's invasion was well planned, or as well planned as they could while they tried to maintain operational secrecy. Obviously the soldiers aren't happy, as it was a huge failure which also means the plans failed.
    1
  24.  @blackcatdungeonmastersfami5311  he's very much a Russian propagandist, and notorious at that.
    1
  25.  @blackcatdungeonmastersfami5311  virtually every operation that fails, which the smo did, looks like a planning failure. But the Russians did their very best while trying to maintain operational secrecy.
    1
  26. That was not a major escalation. Just a PR stunt that you can choose to be impressed by or not.
    1
  27.  @phillystrangler7337  yes, hell of a PR stunt. But nothing more. It has no military significance.
    1
  28. No, because Putin wants to live.
    1