Comments by "Johnny Lego" (@johnnylego807) on "FOX 5 New York" channel.

  1. They’ll plaster the name of a “mass ooter” everywhere yet won’t put this guys name up. Very telling. His account is : Pro-Life Spider-Man.
    5
  2. It’s all fun and games until they take those away too. Leaving us defenseless. As the state this took place in.
    5
  3. They’ll plaster the name of a “mass ooter” everywhere yet won’t put this guys name up. Very telling. His account is : Pro-Life Spider-Man.
    4
  4. This simply is “bad journalism” you can’t “Wifi Jam” cell signal…… they can disable the cameras yes, but not for calling the cops, unless they have a CELL JAMMER which is highly illegal and a completely different piece of tech.
    3
  5. This simply is “bad journalism” you can’t “Wifi Jam” cell signal…… they can disable the cameras yes, but not for calling the cops, unless they have a CELL JAMMER which is highly illegal.
    2
  6. This is really sad. The whole state of NY is rather scary. No protection for civilians. Unfortunately it’s important for businesses. Things should be different. It seems only “criminals” and “unaware officers” have a way to “protect” themselves.
    2
  7. This is really sad. The whole state of NY is rather scary. No protection for civilians. Unfortunately it’s important for businesses. Things should be different. It seems only “criminals” and “unaware officers” have a way to “protect” themselves.
    2
  8.  @Odyssey636 Yeah this isn’t good journalism. It’s “propaganda”.
    2
  9. Y’all will make anything other than news , News, to distract everyone from what’s rlly going on.
    2
  10.  @Dwigt_Rortugal  The law is nuanced. It’s only illegal to operate. And most “wifi-jammers” aren’t “jamming” any signal at all. Depends on the device/program being used, some just repetitively disconnect the device, and does not fall under the legal definition for “jammer”. With that being said. Unless the “Wifi jammer” is also tuned to target cell frequencies. It cannot disable Cell tower capture. And at that point it would no longer be a “wifi-jammer” but also a “cell jammer” which does fall under “Federal law”. This is still considered poor journalism, as the device the thieves are using is more akin to that of a “cell-jammer” based on there claims. Not your traditional “wifi-jammer” as this has “additional” capabilities
    1
  11.  @Mi_Fa_Volare Knives are great, but they won’t work when the attackers are in a group, and armed. Your knife is practically useless in that’s scenario.
    1
  12.  @ligmasack9038  I don’t comply. 🫡 neither should anyone else. Just stating what they r trying to do.
    1