Comments by "Pat B" (@patb5266) on "Ukraine deploys U.S.-made 'Avenger' to counter mounting Russian offensive | Watch" video.

  1. He doesn't need to waste hypersonics on this piece of junk😅
    8
  2. Copy/paste much?
    4
  3. Sure to be a "game changer"😅
    3
  4. ​ @radio9730  😅 run along now, back to that Forbes article, boy sure it taking you a long time to read it
    3
  5. ​ @davidburke5782  so an object flown can't reach it's terminal velocity on decent, back to school radio9😅
    3
  6. It's not, or lancets, or 155's, Grad, Tos1. It looks like something the Americans just threw together. Another wondewaffle fail.
    2
  7. This piece of junk isn't modern, nor are the Leo 1's, 2's or C2. They are getting the old junk. US stopped using this 20+years ago😅
    2
  8. ​ @radio9730  keep spewing nonsense to get that quota😅
    2
  9. "game changers"😅
    2
  10. ​ @SerBallister  have you seen the impact or its "velocity"? Nope, you only have the "information" given by the US😅
    2
  11. ​ @davidburke5782  you know how fast it was going do you and the angle of impact? Of course you do😅
    2
  12. ​ @SerBallister  still waiting for your terminal velocity calculations. I'll give you a hint, start with 9.8m/s/s. Go from there. Do you want me to give the equation for the actual calculation so you can figure it out for yourself?
    2
  13. ​ @davidburke5782  still waiting for your picture of the Reaper
    2
  14. ​ @paulmeaney1283  I doubt it's in one piece. Doesn't really matter, the recovery is enough of an embarrassment to the US😅
    2
  15. ​ @SerBallister  never said I had any nor did I claim it was intact..you're the one making claims so let's see your picture.
    2
  16. ​ @davidburke5782  lol, sure says the guy talking about Tv then proves he doesn't know what he's talking about. I posted the formula now go do some math and prove it's terminal velocity it 300 mph as you claimed. I'll wait for the calculations😅
    2
  17. ​ @paulmeaney1283  for sure, Burke for instance claims a certain terminal velocity, then says it was flown into the water, yet he doesn't show the math because he can't do it. It's not even a hard calculation and I posted it.
    2
  18. ​ @radio9730  care to post some facts to back up that claim? Oh right the video of some T 55's on a train from somewhere going somewhere. Yup that's proof😅. Meanwhile the Ukros had T 55S from Slovakia but those are great right? Finish that Forbes article yet? I know there are lots of words with more than 4 letters so maybe mommy can help
    2
  19. ​ @davidburke5782  I know what terminal velocity is and how to calculate it. You claim it was "flown into the water at 300 mph" yet post no proof. "There's not much left" no pictures. Yet you expect others to post pictures😅
    2
  20. ​ @radio9730  still trying to finish that Forbes article. No surprise you're in this thread with "Burke"😅
    2
  21. ​ @hg6996  one Leo is currently being used to search the bottom of a swamp, more to follow.
    1
  22. ​ @hg6996  Ukraine is done, where are the 88 Leo 1's that were sent? Not one word😅
    1
  23. ​ @hg6996  yup supposed to have been there before the Leo 2. Not a word either way. Won't matter anyway😅
    1
  24. Huge!
    1
  25. Lol, thanks for proving yet again you're a brainless spamming fool that put together a comprehensive sentence 😅
    1
  26. ​ @davidburke5782  says the guy that copy/pastes 50 comments in a row😅😅. Man you ukro trolls are beyond stupid
    1
  27. ​ @davidburke5782  just reported you for harassment, as that's what this is..still waiting for your picture of the Reaper loser.
    1
  28. Not much, no stock to re arm them.
    1
  29. ​ @peterlamin8363  lol sure they did, with tens of billions in weapons and an army of 300k that folded in days to the Taliban.
    1
  30. Just for fun I googled this piece of junk. Along with the usual pro ukro nonsense I was very surprised to see a Forbes story from the 14th just trashing it. "Last ditch" " lightly armoured even against small arms" "vulnerable" "3 mile range". It's even worse than I thought and if pro ukro Forbes is saying this you know it's junk😅
    1
  31. ​​ @radio9730  I'm not a Putin fanboy because I support Russia, typical low intelligence immature comment by you. Go read the article, I did. There's lots of "rage" in it😅. You're a coward so you won't.
    1
  32. ​ @radio9730  says the clown that has a quota. Finished that Forbes article did you? Yeah didn't this so coward.
    1
  33. It is, google it and look for the Forbes story in it, it's bad😅
    1
  34. ​ @SerBallister  ok fools I know what "terminal velocity" is, apparently neither of you 2 do😅. It's not 300 mph, maybe do a google search. In addition there's no proof how much in control the operator was. If either of you clowns actually watched the video you'd see a bent prop and it's still flying fine. Yet you expect me to prove what you can't . Show me pictures of it hitting the water and what's left of it.
    1
  35. ​ @davidburke5782  gonna spam my comment again loser?😅
    1
  36. ​ @davidburke5782  "flown into the water" got pictures ? See how that works genius? You make claims without proof then when you get called out you tell me or others to post proof. Your trolls are just dumb, can't even tell when you contradict yourself😅
    1
  37. ​ @lasse888  run along radio9
    1
  38. Looks like cardboard on the front and door😅
    1