Comments by "Pat B" (@patb5266) on "Russia Details Ukr Losses, Kakhovka Dam Destroyed to Enable Ukr Redeployment; Medvedev RU Offensive" video.

 Cynthia DeMario "...proven to be a lie..." When and by whom?
4
 @PåGyngendeGrund the ukros do not have the initiative lol
4
 @jpphua602 don't argue with Jeff "smarter than most" Goldblum 😅
3
 @magicponyrides do you still sniff glue or have you switched to copecanium?
3
 @johnnafarrell3336 this story has been well quoted in multiple channels, it's fact.
3
 Johana Milli lol this isn't 1941 nor where there any "counter offensive " operations in Zap area. You missed the memo, it's only probing, the counter offensive hasn't started 😅
2
@jeffgoldblum4483 great argument galaxy brain, attacking the channel and not the content. Typical LOW IQ response. Everyone that disagrees with you is a "conspiracy theorists" surprised you didn't throw in "racist" as well.
1
@MrRoyalbeers meanwhile the ukros have lost thousands of troops and dozens of vehicles . Of course the ukro trolls jump all over this as it's all you have . Where's the confirmation this was a harvester?
1
I think the RF are letting the ukros expend themselves, then when they are finished they will attack.
1
The video showing the Leopard tank hit was not from a KH fired munition. It does appear to be a harvester IN MY OPINION. First the "barrel" is too thick and short even given the supposed rotation angle of the turret. Second it's solo just sitting there, that makes no sense even with the ridiculous ukro operations. Third there's no evidence it's running, the heat signature from the fired munition is clearly visible and none from target. Now with number 3 that's not proof as I don't know the capabilities of the optics and I don't know if an actual running tank would show heat signature if in fact a running tank was in view. 4th, the tracks are far too visible and outside the body. I think it's mistaken identity and is a harvester. Either way it's moot as the ukros are still failing badly.
1